Cargando…

Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis

BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Os, Jim, Pries, Lotta-Katrin, ten Have, Margreet, de Graaf, Ron, van Dorsselaer, Saskia, Bak, Maarten, Kenis, Gunter, Lin, Bochao D., Gunther, Nicole, Luykx, Jurjen J., Rutten, Bart P. F., Guloksuz, Sinan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445
_version_ 1785026400691945472
author van Os, Jim
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Lin, Bochao D.
Gunther, Nicole
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P. F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
author_facet van Os, Jim
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Lin, Bochao D.
Gunther, Nicole
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P. F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
author_sort van Os, Jim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need for care and health care outcomes was examined prospectively as a function of the contextual clinical characterization diagnostic framework in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6646 at baseline), interviewed four times between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). Measures of need, service use, and use of medication were predicted as a function of any of 13 DSM-IV diagnoses, both separately and in combination with clinical characterization across multiple domains: social circumstances/demographics, symptom dimensions, physical health, clinical/etiological factors, staging, and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Effect sizes were expressed as population attributable fractions. RESULTS: Any prediction of DSM-diagnosis in relation to need and outcome in separate models was entirely reducible to components of contextual clinical characterization in joint models, particularly the component of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions (a simple score of the number of anxiety, depression, mania, and psychosis symptoms) and staging (subthreshold, incidence, persistence), and to a lesser degree clinical factors (early adversity, family history, suicidality, slowness at interview, neuroticism, and extraversion), and sociodemographic factors. Clinical characterization components in combination predicted more than any component in isolation. PRS did not meaningfully contribute to any clinical characterization model. CONCLUSION: A transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more value to patients than a categorical system of algorithmic ordering of psychopathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101062902023-04-17 Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis van Os, Jim Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Lin, Bochao D. Gunther, Nicole Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P. F. Guloksuz, Sinan Psychol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need for care and health care outcomes was examined prospectively as a function of the contextual clinical characterization diagnostic framework in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6646 at baseline), interviewed four times between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). Measures of need, service use, and use of medication were predicted as a function of any of 13 DSM-IV diagnoses, both separately and in combination with clinical characterization across multiple domains: social circumstances/demographics, symptom dimensions, physical health, clinical/etiological factors, staging, and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Effect sizes were expressed as population attributable fractions. RESULTS: Any prediction of DSM-diagnosis in relation to need and outcome in separate models was entirely reducible to components of contextual clinical characterization in joint models, particularly the component of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions (a simple score of the number of anxiety, depression, mania, and psychosis symptoms) and staging (subthreshold, incidence, persistence), and to a lesser degree clinical factors (early adversity, family history, suicidality, slowness at interview, neuroticism, and extraversion), and sociodemographic factors. Clinical characterization components in combination predicted more than any component in isolation. PRS did not meaningfully contribute to any clinical characterization model. CONCLUSION: A transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more value to patients than a categorical system of algorithmic ordering of psychopathology. Cambridge University Press 2023-04 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10106290/ /pubmed/37310330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Os, Jim
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Lin, Bochao D.
Gunther, Nicole
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P. F.
Guloksuz, Sinan
Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title_full Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title_fullStr Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title_short Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
title_sort context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445
work_keys_str_mv AT vanosjim contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT prieslottakatrin contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT tenhavemargreet contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT degraafron contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT vandorsselaersaskia contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT bakmaarten contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT kenisgunter contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT linbochaod contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT gunthernicole contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT luykxjurjenj contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT ruttenbartpf contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis
AT guloksuzsinan contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis