Cargando…
Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis
BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445 |
_version_ | 1785026400691945472 |
---|---|
author | van Os, Jim Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Lin, Bochao D. Gunther, Nicole Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P. F. Guloksuz, Sinan |
author_facet | van Os, Jim Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Lin, Bochao D. Gunther, Nicole Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P. F. Guloksuz, Sinan |
author_sort | van Os, Jim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need for care and health care outcomes was examined prospectively as a function of the contextual clinical characterization diagnostic framework in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6646 at baseline), interviewed four times between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). Measures of need, service use, and use of medication were predicted as a function of any of 13 DSM-IV diagnoses, both separately and in combination with clinical characterization across multiple domains: social circumstances/demographics, symptom dimensions, physical health, clinical/etiological factors, staging, and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Effect sizes were expressed as population attributable fractions. RESULTS: Any prediction of DSM-diagnosis in relation to need and outcome in separate models was entirely reducible to components of contextual clinical characterization in joint models, particularly the component of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions (a simple score of the number of anxiety, depression, mania, and psychosis symptoms) and staging (subthreshold, incidence, persistence), and to a lesser degree clinical factors (early adversity, family history, suicidality, slowness at interview, neuroticism, and extraversion), and sociodemographic factors. Clinical characterization components in combination predicted more than any component in isolation. PRS did not meaningfully contribute to any clinical characterization model. CONCLUSION: A transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more value to patients than a categorical system of algorithmic ordering of psychopathology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101062902023-04-17 Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis van Os, Jim Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Lin, Bochao D. Gunther, Nicole Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P. F. Guloksuz, Sinan Psychol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: A transdiagnostic and contextual framework of ‘clinical characterization’, combining clinical, psychopathological, sociodemographic, etiological, and other personal contextual data, may add clinical value over and above categorical algorithm-based diagnosis. METHODS: Prediction of need for care and health care outcomes was examined prospectively as a function of the contextual clinical characterization diagnostic framework in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6646 at baseline), interviewed four times between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). Measures of need, service use, and use of medication were predicted as a function of any of 13 DSM-IV diagnoses, both separately and in combination with clinical characterization across multiple domains: social circumstances/demographics, symptom dimensions, physical health, clinical/etiological factors, staging, and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Effect sizes were expressed as population attributable fractions. RESULTS: Any prediction of DSM-diagnosis in relation to need and outcome in separate models was entirely reducible to components of contextual clinical characterization in joint models, particularly the component of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions (a simple score of the number of anxiety, depression, mania, and psychosis symptoms) and staging (subthreshold, incidence, persistence), and to a lesser degree clinical factors (early adversity, family history, suicidality, slowness at interview, neuroticism, and extraversion), and sociodemographic factors. Clinical characterization components in combination predicted more than any component in isolation. PRS did not meaningfully contribute to any clinical characterization model. CONCLUSION: A transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more value to patients than a categorical system of algorithmic ordering of psychopathology. Cambridge University Press 2023-04 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10106290/ /pubmed/37310330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van Os, Jim Pries, Lotta-Katrin ten Have, Margreet de Graaf, Ron van Dorsselaer, Saskia Bak, Maarten Kenis, Gunter Lin, Bochao D. Gunther, Nicole Luykx, Jurjen J. Rutten, Bart P. F. Guloksuz, Sinan Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title | Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title_full | Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title_short | Context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
title_sort | context v. algorithm: evidence that a transdiagnostic framework of contextual clinical characterization is of more clinical value than categorical diagnosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanosjim contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT prieslottakatrin contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT tenhavemargreet contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT degraafron contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT vandorsselaersaskia contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT bakmaarten contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT kenisgunter contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT linbochaod contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT gunthernicole contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT luykxjurjenj contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT ruttenbartpf contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis AT guloksuzsinan contextvalgorithmevidencethatatransdiagnosticframeworkofcontextualclinicalcharacterizationisofmoreclinicalvaluethancategoricaldiagnosis |