Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies regarding the efficacy and safety of cladribine in the MS population, we aimed to conduct a systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nabizadeh, Fardin, Mohamadi, Mobin, Rahmani, Shayan, Rajabi, Rayan, Afrashteh, Fatemeh, Najdaghi, Soroush, Mirmosayyeb, Omid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w
_version_ 1785026410106060800
author Nabizadeh, Fardin
Mohamadi, Mobin
Rahmani, Shayan
Rajabi, Rayan
Afrashteh, Fatemeh
Najdaghi, Soroush
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
author_facet Nabizadeh, Fardin
Mohamadi, Mobin
Rahmani, Shayan
Rajabi, Rayan
Afrashteh, Fatemeh
Najdaghi, Soroush
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
author_sort Nabizadeh, Fardin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies regarding the efficacy and safety of cladribine in the MS population, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis by including clinical trials and observational studies in terms of having more confirmative results to make a general decision. METHODS: The three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in May 2022. We included the studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of cladribine in patients with MS. Eligible studies have to provide sufficient details on MS diagnosis and appropriate follow-up duration. We investigated the efficacy of cladribine with several outcomes including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and MRI-free activity survival (MFAS). RESULTS: After two-step reviewing, 23 studies were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The pooled SMD for EDSS before and after treatment was − 0.54 (95%CI: − 1.46, 0.39). Our analysis showed that the PFS after cladribine use is 79% (95%CI 71%, 86%). Also, 58% of patients with MS who received cladribine remained relapse-free (95%CI 31%, 83%). Furthermore, the MFAS after treatment was 60% (95%CI 36%, 81%). Our analysis showed that infection is the most common adverse event after cladribine treatment with a pooled prevalence of 10% (95%CI 4%, 18%). Moreover, the pooled prevalence of infusion-related adverse events was 9% (95%CI 4%, 15%). Also, the malignancies after cladribine were present in 0.4% of patients (95%CI 0.25%, 0.75%). CONCLUSION: Our results showed acceptable safety and efficacy for cladribine for the treatment of MS except in terms of reducing EDSS. Combination of our findings with the results of previous studies which compared cladribine to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), cladribine seems to be a safe and effective drug in achieving better treatment for relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101063222023-04-18 Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nabizadeh, Fardin Mohamadi, Mobin Rahmani, Shayan Rajabi, Rayan Afrashteh, Fatemeh Najdaghi, Soroush Mirmosayyeb, Omid Neurol Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies regarding the efficacy and safety of cladribine in the MS population, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis by including clinical trials and observational studies in terms of having more confirmative results to make a general decision. METHODS: The three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in May 2022. We included the studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of cladribine in patients with MS. Eligible studies have to provide sufficient details on MS diagnosis and appropriate follow-up duration. We investigated the efficacy of cladribine with several outcomes including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and MRI-free activity survival (MFAS). RESULTS: After two-step reviewing, 23 studies were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The pooled SMD for EDSS before and after treatment was − 0.54 (95%CI: − 1.46, 0.39). Our analysis showed that the PFS after cladribine use is 79% (95%CI 71%, 86%). Also, 58% of patients with MS who received cladribine remained relapse-free (95%CI 31%, 83%). Furthermore, the MFAS after treatment was 60% (95%CI 36%, 81%). Our analysis showed that infection is the most common adverse event after cladribine treatment with a pooled prevalence of 10% (95%CI 4%, 18%). Moreover, the pooled prevalence of infusion-related adverse events was 9% (95%CI 4%, 15%). Also, the malignancies after cladribine were present in 0.4% of patients (95%CI 0.25%, 0.75%). CONCLUSION: Our results showed acceptable safety and efficacy for cladribine for the treatment of MS except in terms of reducing EDSS. Combination of our findings with the results of previous studies which compared cladribine to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), cladribine seems to be a safe and effective drug in achieving better treatment for relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10106322/ /pubmed/37062787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w Text en © Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Nabizadeh, Fardin
Mohamadi, Mobin
Rahmani, Shayan
Rajabi, Rayan
Afrashteh, Fatemeh
Najdaghi, Soroush
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w
work_keys_str_mv AT nabizadehfardin safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohamadimobin safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahmanishayan safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajabirayan safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afrashtehfatemeh safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT najdaghisoroush safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mirmosayyebomid safetyandefficacyofcladribineinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis