Cargando…

Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS

In this proof-of-concept study, we questioned whether the influence of TMS on cortical excitability can be applied to classical conditioning. More specifically, we investigated whether the faciliatory influence of paired-pulse TMS on the excitability of the human motor cortex can be transferred to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ewers, Stefan P., Dreier, Timo M., Al-Bas, Siham, Schwenkreis, Peter, Pleger, Burkhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32894-w
_version_ 1785026418127667200
author Ewers, Stefan P.
Dreier, Timo M.
Al-Bas, Siham
Schwenkreis, Peter
Pleger, Burkhard
author_facet Ewers, Stefan P.
Dreier, Timo M.
Al-Bas, Siham
Schwenkreis, Peter
Pleger, Burkhard
author_sort Ewers, Stefan P.
collection PubMed
description In this proof-of-concept study, we questioned whether the influence of TMS on cortical excitability can be applied to classical conditioning. More specifically, we investigated whether the faciliatory influence of paired-pulse TMS on the excitability of the human motor cortex can be transferred to a simultaneously presented auditory stimulus through conditioning. During the conditioning phase, 75 healthy young participants received 170 faciliatory paired TMS pulses (1st pulse at 95% resting motor threshold, 2nd at 130%, interstimulus interval 12 ms), always presented simultaneously with one out of two acoustic stimuli. In the test phase, 20 min later, we pseudorandomly applied 100 single TMS pulses (at 130% MT), 50 paired with the conditioned tone—50 paired with a control tone. Using the Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test, we found significantly enhanced median amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) paired with the conditioned tone as compared to the control tone, suggesting successful conditioning (p = 0.031, responder rate 55%, small effect size of r = − 0.248). The same comparison in only those participants with a paired-pulse amplitude < 2 mV in the conditioning phase, increased the responder rate to 61% (n = 38) and effect size to moderate (r = − 0.389). If we considered only those participants with a median paired-pulse amplitude < 1 mV, responder rate increased further to 79% (n = 14) and effect size to r = − 0.727 (i.e., large effect). These findings suggest increasingly stronger conditioning effects for smaller MEP amplitudes during paired-pulse TMS conditioning. These proof-of-concept findings extend the scope of classical conditioning to faciliatory paired-pulse TMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101064572023-04-18 Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS Ewers, Stefan P. Dreier, Timo M. Al-Bas, Siham Schwenkreis, Peter Pleger, Burkhard Sci Rep Article In this proof-of-concept study, we questioned whether the influence of TMS on cortical excitability can be applied to classical conditioning. More specifically, we investigated whether the faciliatory influence of paired-pulse TMS on the excitability of the human motor cortex can be transferred to a simultaneously presented auditory stimulus through conditioning. During the conditioning phase, 75 healthy young participants received 170 faciliatory paired TMS pulses (1st pulse at 95% resting motor threshold, 2nd at 130%, interstimulus interval 12 ms), always presented simultaneously with one out of two acoustic stimuli. In the test phase, 20 min later, we pseudorandomly applied 100 single TMS pulses (at 130% MT), 50 paired with the conditioned tone—50 paired with a control tone. Using the Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test, we found significantly enhanced median amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) paired with the conditioned tone as compared to the control tone, suggesting successful conditioning (p = 0.031, responder rate 55%, small effect size of r = − 0.248). The same comparison in only those participants with a paired-pulse amplitude < 2 mV in the conditioning phase, increased the responder rate to 61% (n = 38) and effect size to moderate (r = − 0.389). If we considered only those participants with a median paired-pulse amplitude < 1 mV, responder rate increased further to 79% (n = 14) and effect size to r = − 0.727 (i.e., large effect). These findings suggest increasingly stronger conditioning effects for smaller MEP amplitudes during paired-pulse TMS conditioning. These proof-of-concept findings extend the scope of classical conditioning to faciliatory paired-pulse TMS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10106457/ /pubmed/37062779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32894-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ewers, Stefan P.
Dreier, Timo M.
Al-Bas, Siham
Schwenkreis, Peter
Pleger, Burkhard
Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title_full Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title_fullStr Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title_full_unstemmed Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title_short Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS
title_sort classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse tms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32894-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ewersstefanp classicalconditioningoffaciliatorypairedpulsetms
AT dreiertimom classicalconditioningoffaciliatorypairedpulsetms
AT albassiham classicalconditioningoffaciliatorypairedpulsetms
AT schwenkreispeter classicalconditioningoffaciliatorypairedpulsetms
AT plegerburkhard classicalconditioningoffaciliatorypairedpulsetms