Cargando…
Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration
INTRODUCTION: Both hearing loss and dementia are extremely pervasive, especially amongst older adults. As hearing loss and dementia have common symptoms, misdiagnosis can be common, and failure to address hearing loss for people with dementia could accelerate cognitive decline. The timely detection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1143128 |
_version_ | 1785026432985989120 |
---|---|
author | Broome, Emma E. Tannirandorn, Puntrika Straus, Jean Beale, Phoebe Heffernan, Eithne Dening, Tom Henshaw, Helen |
author_facet | Broome, Emma E. Tannirandorn, Puntrika Straus, Jean Beale, Phoebe Heffernan, Eithne Dening, Tom Henshaw, Helen |
author_sort | Broome, Emma E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Both hearing loss and dementia are extremely pervasive, especially amongst older adults. As hearing loss and dementia have common symptoms, misdiagnosis can be common, and failure to address hearing loss for people with dementia could accelerate cognitive decline. The timely detection of cognitive impairment is clinically important, however the use of cognitive assessments in adult audiology services is a hotly debated topic. Although the early detection of cognitive impairment may improve patient care and quality of life, patients attending audiology services for hearing assessment might not expect to be asked questions about their cognition. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore patient and public perspectives and preferences on the use of cognitive screening within adult audiology services. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from an online survey and a workshop. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantitative data and an inductive thematic analysis was performed on free-text responses. RESULTS: In total, 90 respondents completed the online survey. Overall, cognitive screening in audiology was reported to be acceptable to participants (92%). A reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data reported four themes: i) knowledge of cognitive impairment and screening, ii) implementation of cognitive screening, iii) impact of screening on patient and iv) contributions to future care and research. A workshop was held with five participants to discuss and reflect on the findings in more detail. DISCUSSION: Participants found cognitive screening to be acceptable within adult audiology services providing audiologists had suitable training, and sufficient explanation and justification were provided. However, implications such as additional time and staff resource and supplementary training for audiologists would be required to address participants concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101065802023-04-18 Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration Broome, Emma E. Tannirandorn, Puntrika Straus, Jean Beale, Phoebe Heffernan, Eithne Dening, Tom Henshaw, Helen Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: Both hearing loss and dementia are extremely pervasive, especially amongst older adults. As hearing loss and dementia have common symptoms, misdiagnosis can be common, and failure to address hearing loss for people with dementia could accelerate cognitive decline. The timely detection of cognitive impairment is clinically important, however the use of cognitive assessments in adult audiology services is a hotly debated topic. Although the early detection of cognitive impairment may improve patient care and quality of life, patients attending audiology services for hearing assessment might not expect to be asked questions about their cognition. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore patient and public perspectives and preferences on the use of cognitive screening within adult audiology services. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from an online survey and a workshop. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantitative data and an inductive thematic analysis was performed on free-text responses. RESULTS: In total, 90 respondents completed the online survey. Overall, cognitive screening in audiology was reported to be acceptable to participants (92%). A reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data reported four themes: i) knowledge of cognitive impairment and screening, ii) implementation of cognitive screening, iii) impact of screening on patient and iv) contributions to future care and research. A workshop was held with five participants to discuss and reflect on the findings in more detail. DISCUSSION: Participants found cognitive screening to be acceptable within adult audiology services providing audiologists had suitable training, and sufficient explanation and justification were provided. However, implications such as additional time and staff resource and supplementary training for audiologists would be required to address participants concerns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10106580/ /pubmed/37077572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1143128 Text en Copyright © 2023 Broome, Tannirandorn, Straus, Beale, Heffernan, Dening and Henshaw. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Broome, Emma E. Tannirandorn, Puntrika Straus, Jean Beale, Phoebe Heffernan, Eithne Dening, Tom Henshaw, Helen Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title | Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title_full | Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title_fullStr | Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title_short | Patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: A qualitative exploration |
title_sort | patient perceptions of cognitive screening in adult audiology services: a qualitative exploration |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1143128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broomeemmae patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT tannirandornpuntrika patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT strausjean patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT bealephoebe patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT heffernaneithne patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT deningtom patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration AT henshawhelen patientperceptionsofcognitivescreeninginadultaudiologyservicesaqualitativeexploration |