Cargando…

Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors

The development of accurate grain yield (GY) multivariate models using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) assessments obtained from aerial vehicles and additional agronomic traits is a promising option to assist, or even substitute, laborious agronomic in-field evaluations for wheat varie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gracia-Romero, Adrian, Rufo, Rubén, Gómez-Candón, David, Soriano, José Miguel, Bellvert, Joaquim, Yannam, Venkata Rami Reddy, Gulino, Davide, Lopes, Marta S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1063983
_version_ 1785026438637813760
author Gracia-Romero, Adrian
Rufo, Rubén
Gómez-Candón, David
Soriano, José Miguel
Bellvert, Joaquim
Yannam, Venkata Rami Reddy
Gulino, Davide
Lopes, Marta S.
author_facet Gracia-Romero, Adrian
Rufo, Rubén
Gómez-Candón, David
Soriano, José Miguel
Bellvert, Joaquim
Yannam, Venkata Rami Reddy
Gulino, Davide
Lopes, Marta S.
author_sort Gracia-Romero, Adrian
collection PubMed
description The development of accurate grain yield (GY) multivariate models using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) assessments obtained from aerial vehicles and additional agronomic traits is a promising option to assist, or even substitute, laborious agronomic in-field evaluations for wheat variety trials. This study proposed improved GY prediction models for wheat experimental trials. Calibration models were developed using all possible combinations of aerial NDVI, plant height, phenology, and ear density from experimental trials of three crop seasons. First, models were developed using 20, 50 and 100 plots in training sets and GY predictions were only moderately improved by increasing the size of the training set. Then, the best models predicting GY were defined in terms of the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the inclusion of days to heading, ear density or plant height together with NDVI in most cases were better (lower BIC) than NDVI alone. This was particularly evident when NDVI saturates (with yields above 8 t ha(-1)) with models including NDVI and days to heading providing a 50% increase in the prediction accuracy and a 10% decrease in the root mean square error. These results showed an improvement of NDVI prediction models by the addition of other agronomic traits. Moreover, NDVI and additional agronomic traits were unreliable predictors of grain yield in wheat landraces and conventional yield quantification methods must be used in this case. Saturation and underestimation of productivity may be explained by differences in other yield components that NDVI alone cannot detect (e.g. differences in grain size and number).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101066032023-04-18 Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors Gracia-Romero, Adrian Rufo, Rubén Gómez-Candón, David Soriano, José Miguel Bellvert, Joaquim Yannam, Venkata Rami Reddy Gulino, Davide Lopes, Marta S. Front Plant Sci Plant Science The development of accurate grain yield (GY) multivariate models using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) assessments obtained from aerial vehicles and additional agronomic traits is a promising option to assist, or even substitute, laborious agronomic in-field evaluations for wheat variety trials. This study proposed improved GY prediction models for wheat experimental trials. Calibration models were developed using all possible combinations of aerial NDVI, plant height, phenology, and ear density from experimental trials of three crop seasons. First, models were developed using 20, 50 and 100 plots in training sets and GY predictions were only moderately improved by increasing the size of the training set. Then, the best models predicting GY were defined in terms of the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the inclusion of days to heading, ear density or plant height together with NDVI in most cases were better (lower BIC) than NDVI alone. This was particularly evident when NDVI saturates (with yields above 8 t ha(-1)) with models including NDVI and days to heading providing a 50% increase in the prediction accuracy and a 10% decrease in the root mean square error. These results showed an improvement of NDVI prediction models by the addition of other agronomic traits. Moreover, NDVI and additional agronomic traits were unreliable predictors of grain yield in wheat landraces and conventional yield quantification methods must be used in this case. Saturation and underestimation of productivity may be explained by differences in other yield components that NDVI alone cannot detect (e.g. differences in grain size and number). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10106603/ /pubmed/37077632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1063983 Text en Copyright © 2023 Gracia-Romero, Rufo, Gómez-Candón, Soriano, Bellvert, Yannam, Gulino and Lopes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Gracia-Romero, Adrian
Rufo, Rubén
Gómez-Candón, David
Soriano, José Miguel
Bellvert, Joaquim
Yannam, Venkata Rami Reddy
Gulino, Davide
Lopes, Marta S.
Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title_full Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title_fullStr Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title_full_unstemmed Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title_short Improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
title_sort improving in-season wheat yield prediction using remote sensing and additional agronomic traits as predictors
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1063983
work_keys_str_mv AT graciaromeroadrian improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT ruforuben improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT gomezcandondavid improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT sorianojosemiguel improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT bellvertjoaquim improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT yannamvenkataramireddy improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT gulinodavide improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors
AT lopesmartas improvinginseasonwheatyieldpredictionusingremotesensingandadditionalagronomictraitsaspredictors