Oral functioning after open versus closed treatment of unilateral condylar neck or base fractures: A two‐centre controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Oral functioning and rehabilitation in patients after condylar trauma can be measured by objective functional outcomes and patient‐reported outcomes. The similarities or differences between these outcomes may contribute to the decision if open treatment (OT) or closed treatment (CT) will obtain the most advantageous results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare OT versus CT for unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures in a two‐centre controlled clinical trial by objective functional outcomes and patient‐reported outcomes measured at 6 weeks and 6 months follow‐up. Additionally, these outcomes were compared within each group. METHODS: Patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2019. In one centre, patients received OT by extra‐oral open reduction and internal fixation. In another centre, patients received CT by maxillomandibular fixation. Objective measurements included the mixing ability test (MAT) and mandibular active range of motion (ROM). Patient‐reported outcomes included the mandibular function impairment questionnaire (MFIQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Independent t‐tests and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to determine differences between the treatment groups at 6 weeks and 6 months follow‐up. Paired t‐tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to determine differences within each group. RESULTS: Thirty‐three patients were enrolled. No differences were found between the groups treated with OT or CT for MAT, ROM, MFIQ and VAS. Both groups showed functional improvement. CONCLUSION: Good objective functional outcomes and patient‐reported outcomes were achieved with both OT and CT in patients with unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures.