Cargando…
Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747 |
_version_ | 1785026572846104576 |
---|---|
author | Crossley, George H. Sanders, Prashanthan De Filippo, Paolo Tarakji, Khaldoun G. Hansky, Bert Shah, Maully Mason, Pamela Maus, Baerbel Holloman, Keith |
author_facet | Crossley, George H. Sanders, Prashanthan De Filippo, Paolo Tarakji, Khaldoun G. Hansky, Bert Shah, Maully Mason, Pamela Maus, Baerbel Holloman, Keith |
author_sort | Crossley, George H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small‐diameter, lumenless, catheter‐delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long‐term reliability. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi‐center, single‐arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre‐market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre‐hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture‐free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in‐vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow‐up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: The LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short‐ and long‐term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10107290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101072902023-04-18 Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design Crossley, George H. Sanders, Prashanthan De Filippo, Paolo Tarakji, Khaldoun G. Hansky, Bert Shah, Maully Mason, Pamela Maus, Baerbel Holloman, Keith J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Featured Articles BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small‐diameter, lumenless, catheter‐delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long‐term reliability. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi‐center, single‐arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre‐market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre‐hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture‐free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in‐vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow‐up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: The LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short‐ and long‐term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10107290/ /pubmed/36378803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Featured Articles Crossley, George H. Sanders, Prashanthan De Filippo, Paolo Tarakji, Khaldoun G. Hansky, Bert Shah, Maully Mason, Pamela Maus, Baerbel Holloman, Keith Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title | Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title_full | Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title_short | Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design |
title_sort | rationale and design of the lead evaluation for defibrillation and reliability study: safety and efficacy of a novel icd lead design |
topic | Featured Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crossleygeorgeh rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT sandersprashanthan rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT defilippopaolo rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT tarakjikhaldoung rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT hanskybert rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT shahmaully rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT masonpamela rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT mausbaerbel rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign AT hollomankeith rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign |