Cargando…

Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crossley, George H., Sanders, Prashanthan, De Filippo, Paolo, Tarakji, Khaldoun G., Hansky, Bert, Shah, Maully, Mason, Pamela, Maus, Baerbel, Holloman, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747
_version_ 1785026572846104576
author Crossley, George H.
Sanders, Prashanthan
De Filippo, Paolo
Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Hansky, Bert
Shah, Maully
Mason, Pamela
Maus, Baerbel
Holloman, Keith
author_facet Crossley, George H.
Sanders, Prashanthan
De Filippo, Paolo
Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Hansky, Bert
Shah, Maully
Mason, Pamela
Maus, Baerbel
Holloman, Keith
author_sort Crossley, George H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small‐diameter, lumenless, catheter‐delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long‐term reliability. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi‐center, single‐arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre‐market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre‐hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture‐free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in‐vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow‐up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: The LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short‐ and long‐term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101072902023-04-18 Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design Crossley, George H. Sanders, Prashanthan De Filippo, Paolo Tarakji, Khaldoun G. Hansky, Bert Shah, Maully Mason, Pamela Maus, Baerbel Holloman, Keith J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Featured Articles BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are indicated for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite enhancements in design and technologies, the ICD lead is the most vulnerable component of the ICD system and failure of ICD leads remains a significant clinical problem. A novel, small‐diameter, lumenless, catheter‐delivered, defibrillator lead was developed with the aim to improve long‐term reliability. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) study is a multi‐center, single‐arm, Bayesian, adaptive design, pre‐market interventional pivotal clinical study. Up to 60 study sites from around the world will participate in the study. Patients indicated for a de novo ICD will undergo defibrillation testing at implantation and clinical assessments at baseline, implant, pre‐hospital discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter until official study closure. Patients may be participating for a minimum of 18 months to approximately 3 years. Fracture‐free survival will be evaluated using a Bayesian statistical method that incorporates both virtual patient data (combination of bench testing to failure with in‐vivo use condition data) with clinical patients. The clinical subject sample size will be determined using decision rules for number of subject enrollments and follow‐up time based upon the observed number of fractures at certain time points in the study. The adaptive study design will therefore result in a minimum of 500 and a maximum of 900 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: The LEADR Clinical Study was designed to efficiently provide evidence for short‐ and long‐term safety and efficacy of a novel lead design using Bayesian methods including a novel virtual patient approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10107290/ /pubmed/36378803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Featured Articles
Crossley, George H.
Sanders, Prashanthan
De Filippo, Paolo
Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Hansky, Bert
Shah, Maully
Mason, Pamela
Maus, Baerbel
Holloman, Keith
Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title_full Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title_short Rationale and design of the Lead Evaluation for Defibrillation and Reliability study: Safety and efficacy of a novel ICD lead design
title_sort rationale and design of the lead evaluation for defibrillation and reliability study: safety and efficacy of a novel icd lead design
topic Featured Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15747
work_keys_str_mv AT crossleygeorgeh rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT sandersprashanthan rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT defilippopaolo rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT tarakjikhaldoung rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT hanskybert rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT shahmaully rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT masonpamela rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT mausbaerbel rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign
AT hollomankeith rationaleanddesignoftheleadevaluationfordefibrillationandreliabilitystudysafetyandefficacyofanovelicdleaddesign