Cargando…
The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13117 |
| _version_ | 1785026582749904896 |
|---|---|
| author | Hordern, Joshua |
| author_facet | Hordern, Joshua |
| author_sort | Hordern, Joshua |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10107329 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-101073292023-04-18 The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ Hordern, Joshua Bioethics Special Issue Articles John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-02 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10107329/ /pubmed/36459676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13117 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
| spellingShingle | Special Issue Articles Hordern, Joshua The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title | The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title_full | The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title_fullStr | The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title_short | The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| title_sort | implausibility of the ‘impracticality’ and ‘professional role’ arguments: a commentary on lauren notini and justin oakley, ‘when (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’ |
| topic | Special Issue Articles |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13117 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hordernjoshua theimplausibilityoftheimpracticalityandprofessionalroleargumentsacommentaryonlaurennotiniandjustinoakleywhenifevermaydoctorsdiscussreligionwiththeirpatients AT hordernjoshua implausibilityoftheimpracticalityandprofessionalroleargumentsacommentaryonlaurennotiniandjustinoakleywhenifevermaydoctorsdiscussreligionwiththeirpatients |