Cargando…

Modulation of central pain mechanisms using high‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation: A double‐blind, sham‐controlled study

BACKGROUND: The use of high‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD‐tDCS) has shown analgesic effects in some chronic pain patients, but limited anti‐nociceptive effects in healthy asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: This double‐blinded sham‐controlled study assessed the effects of HD‐tDC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kold, Sebastian, Graven‐Nielsen, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36451616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2060
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The use of high‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD‐tDCS) has shown analgesic effects in some chronic pain patients, but limited anti‐nociceptive effects in healthy asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: This double‐blinded sham‐controlled study assessed the effects of HD‐tDCS applied on three consecutive days on central pain mechanisms in healthy participants with (N = 40) and without (N = 40) prolonged experimental pain induced by intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor into the right hand on Day 1. Participants were randomly assigned to Sham‐tDCS (N = 20 with pain, N = 20 without) or Active‐tDCS (N = 20 with pain, N = 20 without) targeting simultaneously the primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 min with 2 mA stimulation intensity. Central pain mechanisms were assessed by cuff algometry on the legs measuring pressure pain sensitivity, temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), at baseline and after HD‐tDCS on Day 2 and Day 3. Based on subject's assessment of received HD‐tDCS (sham or active), they were effectively blinded. RESULTS: Compared with Sham‐tDCS, Active‐tDCS did not significantly reduce the average NGF‐induced pain intensity. Tonic pain‐induced temporal summation at Day 2 and Day 3 was significantly lower in the NGF‐pain group under Active‐tDCS compared to the pain group with Sham‐tDCS (p ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found in the cuff pressure pain detection/tolerance thresholds or CPM effect across the 3 days of HD‐tDCS in any of the four groups. CONCLUSION: HD‐tDCS reduced the facilitation of TSP caused by tonic pain suggesting that efficacy of HD‐tDCS might depend on the presence of sensitized central pain mechanisms.