Cargando…

Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally

BACKGROUND: Conventional testing methods for dermatophytes are time‐consuming, and resource limitations in our institution have prompted curtailed access to these diagnostics. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of our hospital's dermatological mycology diagnostic services and similar services nationally. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, James, Porter, Emma, Rafferty, Siobhan, Field, Sinead, O'Connell, Nuala H., Dunne, Colum P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13549
_version_ 1785026626645393408
author Powell, James
Porter, Emma
Rafferty, Siobhan
Field, Sinead
O'Connell, Nuala H.
Dunne, Colum P.
author_facet Powell, James
Porter, Emma
Rafferty, Siobhan
Field, Sinead
O'Connell, Nuala H.
Dunne, Colum P.
author_sort Powell, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional testing methods for dermatophytes are time‐consuming, and resource limitations in our institution have prompted curtailed access to these diagnostics. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of our hospital's dermatological mycology diagnostic services and similar services nationally. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study on skin, hair and nail mycology samples in our institution comparing twenty five‐year periods (2011–2015 and 2016–2021), including analysis of dermatology clinic data and correspondence related to fungal infection. A survey of national public hospitals' laboratories was conducted to evaluate their mycology testing capabilities. RESULTS: The total 5 year test count prior to curtailment was 4851 specimens comprising 90% (n = 4344) from general practice and 6% (n = 290) from dermatology clinics. For the 5 years post curtailment, 64.5% (582/903) of specimens were from dermatology clinics. Dermatology clinic data demonstrated doubling of attendances (for all conditions) and of correspondence related to fungal infection. During this time also, national dermatological antifungal purchasing increased 11%. Ten of 28 Irish public hospital laboratories reported the provision of in‐house dermatological mycology testing, and none had routine availability of susceptibility or molecular testing of dermatophytes. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report an appraisal of dermatological fungal diagnostic services in Ireland. Insufficient testing capacity implies that patients are either being treated for fungal infection without appropriate diagnostic confirmation, or being left untreated because of the lack of access to diagnostics. The introduction of molecular detection methods and susceptibility systems would enhance testing capabilities and reduce the requirement for the external referral.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101075362023-04-18 Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally Powell, James Porter, Emma Rafferty, Siobhan Field, Sinead O'Connell, Nuala H. Dunne, Colum P. Mycoses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Conventional testing methods for dermatophytes are time‐consuming, and resource limitations in our institution have prompted curtailed access to these diagnostics. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of our hospital's dermatological mycology diagnostic services and similar services nationally. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study on skin, hair and nail mycology samples in our institution comparing twenty five‐year periods (2011–2015 and 2016–2021), including analysis of dermatology clinic data and correspondence related to fungal infection. A survey of national public hospitals' laboratories was conducted to evaluate their mycology testing capabilities. RESULTS: The total 5 year test count prior to curtailment was 4851 specimens comprising 90% (n = 4344) from general practice and 6% (n = 290) from dermatology clinics. For the 5 years post curtailment, 64.5% (582/903) of specimens were from dermatology clinics. Dermatology clinic data demonstrated doubling of attendances (for all conditions) and of correspondence related to fungal infection. During this time also, national dermatological antifungal purchasing increased 11%. Ten of 28 Irish public hospital laboratories reported the provision of in‐house dermatological mycology testing, and none had routine availability of susceptibility or molecular testing of dermatophytes. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report an appraisal of dermatological fungal diagnostic services in Ireland. Insufficient testing capacity implies that patients are either being treated for fungal infection without appropriate diagnostic confirmation, or being left untreated because of the lack of access to diagnostics. The introduction of molecular detection methods and susceptibility systems would enhance testing capabilities and reduce the requirement for the external referral. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-09 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10107536/ /pubmed/36448403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13549 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Mycoses published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Powell, James
Porter, Emma
Rafferty, Siobhan
Field, Sinead
O'Connell, Nuala H.
Dunne, Colum P.
Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title_full Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title_fullStr Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title_full_unstemmed Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title_short Dermatology mycology diagnostics in Ireland: National deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
title_sort dermatology mycology diagnostics in ireland: national deficits identified in 2022 that are relevant internationally
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.13549
work_keys_str_mv AT powelljames dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally
AT porteremma dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally
AT raffertysiobhan dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally
AT fieldsinead dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally
AT oconnellnualah dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally
AT dunnecolump dermatologymycologydiagnosticsinirelandnationaldeficitsidentifiedin2022thatarerelevantinternationally