Cargando…

Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation

ABSTRACT: The gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation of starch influence texture, quality, and shelf‐life attributes of many foods. The purpose of this work was to document the effects of a 50:50 glucose:fructose (glc:fru) mixture and sucrose solutions on these starch traits to provide a fundam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodbury, Travest J., Pitts, Sarah L., Pilch, Adrianna M., Smith, Paige, Mauer, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16414
_version_ 1785026626871885824
author Woodbury, Travest J.
Pitts, Sarah L.
Pilch, Adrianna M.
Smith, Paige
Mauer, Lisa J.
author_facet Woodbury, Travest J.
Pitts, Sarah L.
Pilch, Adrianna M.
Smith, Paige
Mauer, Lisa J.
author_sort Woodbury, Travest J.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation of starch influence texture, quality, and shelf‐life attributes of many foods. The purpose of this work was to document the effects of a 50:50 glucose:fructose (glc:fru) mixture and sucrose solutions on these starch traits to provide a fundamental basis to explain the different texture and shelf‐life attributes of baked goods formulated with these sugars. Differential scanning calorimetry, rapid visco analyzer, and oscillatory rheometry were used to quantify the effects of glucose, fructose, glc:fru mixture, and sucrose at different concentrations (0% to 60% w/w), on the gelatinization temperature, pasting, and retrogradation properties of wheat starch. Distinct differences were found between the effects of sucrose and those of the monosaccharides including the glc:fru mixture. Sucrose elevated T (gel) and pasting temperature most and decreased other RVA parameters compared to the monosaccharides as concentration increased. Fructose and the glc:fru mixture promoted amylopectin retrogradation, while retrogradation was inhibited in sucrose and glucose solutions. The glc:fru mixture had similar effects on starch properties compared to fructose under static measurement conditions (DSC), and the effects were in between those of glucose and fructose under dynamic conditions when shear was applied (RVA and rheology). These effects are explained by the phase separation and/or solute partitioning of the monosaccharide constituents of the glc:fru mixture. Sugar solution physicochemical properties correlated strongly with starch gelatinization and retrogradation. The results substantiate the important relationship between sugar physicochemical properties and solution dynamics with starch thermal properties, which in turn affect the texture and structure of starch‐containing food products. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The quality attributes of starch‐containing baked goods are influenced by how different amounts and types of sugars affect starch cooking properties. The underlying mechanisms of the different sugar effects involve solution viscosity, intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and phase separation. Substituting one sugar for another has less effect on these starch properties in products with lower sugar concentrations than in products with more sugar. Mixtures of sugars behave differently than single sugars in different conditions due to phase separation. Baked goods made with glucose:fructose mixtures in place of sucrose likely have higher amounts of gelatinized starch and increased firmness (i.e., staling or retrogradation) over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101075372023-04-18 Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation Woodbury, Travest J. Pitts, Sarah L. Pilch, Adrianna M. Smith, Paige Mauer, Lisa J. J Food Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES ABSTRACT: The gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation of starch influence texture, quality, and shelf‐life attributes of many foods. The purpose of this work was to document the effects of a 50:50 glucose:fructose (glc:fru) mixture and sucrose solutions on these starch traits to provide a fundamental basis to explain the different texture and shelf‐life attributes of baked goods formulated with these sugars. Differential scanning calorimetry, rapid visco analyzer, and oscillatory rheometry were used to quantify the effects of glucose, fructose, glc:fru mixture, and sucrose at different concentrations (0% to 60% w/w), on the gelatinization temperature, pasting, and retrogradation properties of wheat starch. Distinct differences were found between the effects of sucrose and those of the monosaccharides including the glc:fru mixture. Sucrose elevated T (gel) and pasting temperature most and decreased other RVA parameters compared to the monosaccharides as concentration increased. Fructose and the glc:fru mixture promoted amylopectin retrogradation, while retrogradation was inhibited in sucrose and glucose solutions. The glc:fru mixture had similar effects on starch properties compared to fructose under static measurement conditions (DSC), and the effects were in between those of glucose and fructose under dynamic conditions when shear was applied (RVA and rheology). These effects are explained by the phase separation and/or solute partitioning of the monosaccharide constituents of the glc:fru mixture. Sugar solution physicochemical properties correlated strongly with starch gelatinization and retrogradation. The results substantiate the important relationship between sugar physicochemical properties and solution dynamics with starch thermal properties, which in turn affect the texture and structure of starch‐containing food products. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The quality attributes of starch‐containing baked goods are influenced by how different amounts and types of sugars affect starch cooking properties. The underlying mechanisms of the different sugar effects involve solution viscosity, intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and phase separation. Substituting one sugar for another has less effect on these starch properties in products with lower sugar concentrations than in products with more sugar. Mixtures of sugars behave differently than single sugars in different conditions due to phase separation. Baked goods made with glucose:fructose mixtures in place of sucrose likely have higher amounts of gelatinized starch and increased firmness (i.e., staling or retrogradation) over time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-13 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10107537/ /pubmed/36511442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16414 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Food Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Institute of Food Technologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Woodbury, Travest J.
Pitts, Sarah L.
Pilch, Adrianna M.
Smith, Paige
Mauer, Lisa J.
Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title_full Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title_fullStr Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title_short Mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
title_sort mechanisms of the different effects of sucrose, glucose, fructose, and a glucose–fructose mixture on wheat starch gelatinization, pasting, and retrogradation
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36511442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16414
work_keys_str_mv AT woodburytravestj mechanismsofthedifferenteffectsofsucroseglucosefructoseandaglucosefructosemixtureonwheatstarchgelatinizationpastingandretrogradation
AT pittssarahl mechanismsofthedifferenteffectsofsucroseglucosefructoseandaglucosefructosemixtureonwheatstarchgelatinizationpastingandretrogradation
AT pilchadriannam mechanismsofthedifferenteffectsofsucroseglucosefructoseandaglucosefructosemixtureonwheatstarchgelatinizationpastingandretrogradation
AT smithpaige mechanismsofthedifferenteffectsofsucroseglucosefructoseandaglucosefructosemixtureonwheatstarchgelatinizationpastingandretrogradation
AT mauerlisaj mechanismsofthedifferenteffectsofsucroseglucosefructoseandaglucosefructosemixtureonwheatstarchgelatinizationpastingandretrogradation