Cargando…

Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Poor knowledge and the lack of deliberation have been cited as reasons for women making uninformed choices about aneuploidy screening. Adequate pre‐test counselling is of particular importance where non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is being increasingly offered as a primary screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xian Lim, Karen Mei, Lewis, Celine, Wong, Hung Chew, Chong, Glenda Sze Ling, Gosavi, Arundhati, Choolani, Mahesh Arjandas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6279
_version_ 1785026649294635008
author Xian Lim, Karen Mei
Lewis, Celine
Wong, Hung Chew
Chong, Glenda Sze Ling
Gosavi, Arundhati
Choolani, Mahesh Arjandas
author_facet Xian Lim, Karen Mei
Lewis, Celine
Wong, Hung Chew
Chong, Glenda Sze Ling
Gosavi, Arundhati
Choolani, Mahesh Arjandas
author_sort Xian Lim, Karen Mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor knowledge and the lack of deliberation have been cited as reasons for women making uninformed choices about aneuploidy screening. Adequate pre‐test counselling is of particular importance where non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is being increasingly offered as a primary screening test. DESIGN: Women attending the antenatal clinic with a singleton pregnancy below 14 weeks were randomised to receive routine counselling or the intervention—a 16‐min educational video on aneuploidy screening before their consult. The primary outcome, rate of informed choice, was assessed using an adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice questionnaire, where informed choice was defined as good knowledge and value‐consistent behaviour. Secondary outcomes included informed choice with deliberation, decisional conflict and anxiety. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty‐six women were recruited. 69.8% of women in the intervention group made an informed choice compared with 53.6% in the control group (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.30, p = 0.014). A significantly higher number of women in the intervention group had good knowledge compared to controls (81% vs. 60.9%; RR 1.33, p = 0.001). Decisional conflict did not differ between groups, but women in the intervention group had higher anxiety scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study intervention was effective in helping women make informed choice. Qualitative studies to determine the reason for increased anxiety are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT05492981.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101076332023-04-18 Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial Xian Lim, Karen Mei Lewis, Celine Wong, Hung Chew Chong, Glenda Sze Ling Gosavi, Arundhati Choolani, Mahesh Arjandas Prenat Diagn Original Articles BACKGROUND: Poor knowledge and the lack of deliberation have been cited as reasons for women making uninformed choices about aneuploidy screening. Adequate pre‐test counselling is of particular importance where non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is being increasingly offered as a primary screening test. DESIGN: Women attending the antenatal clinic with a singleton pregnancy below 14 weeks were randomised to receive routine counselling or the intervention—a 16‐min educational video on aneuploidy screening before their consult. The primary outcome, rate of informed choice, was assessed using an adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice questionnaire, where informed choice was defined as good knowledge and value‐consistent behaviour. Secondary outcomes included informed choice with deliberation, decisional conflict and anxiety. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty‐six women were recruited. 69.8% of women in the intervention group made an informed choice compared with 53.6% in the control group (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.30, p = 0.014). A significantly higher number of women in the intervention group had good knowledge compared to controls (81% vs. 60.9%; RR 1.33, p = 0.001). Decisional conflict did not differ between groups, but women in the intervention group had higher anxiety scores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study intervention was effective in helping women make informed choice. Qualitative studies to determine the reason for increased anxiety are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT05492981. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-28 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10107633/ /pubmed/36550063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6279 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Xian Lim, Karen Mei
Lewis, Celine
Wong, Hung Chew
Chong, Glenda Sze Ling
Gosavi, Arundhati
Choolani, Mahesh Arjandas
Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title_full Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title_short Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial
title_sort does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6279
work_keys_str_mv AT xianlimkarenmei doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lewisceline doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wonghungchew doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chongglendaszeling doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gosaviarundhati doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT choolanimahesharjandas doesaneducationalvideoforaneuploidyscreeningimproveinformedchoiceamongpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial