Cargando…

Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing

BACKGROUND: Hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve cognitive function in adult patients with cancer treated with whole‐brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. However, the feasibility of HA in pediatric patients with brain tumors has not been explored because of concerns of incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baliga, Sujith, Adams, Judith A., Bajaj, Benjamin V. M., Van Benthuysen, Liam, Daartz, Juliane, Gallotto, Sara L., Lewy, Jacqueline R., DeNunzio, Nicholas, Weyman, Elizabeth A., Lawell, Miranda P., Palmer, Joshua D., Yeap, Beow Y., Ebb, David H., Huang, Mary S., Perry, Alisa F., MacDonald, Shannon M., Jones, Robin M., Tarbell, Nancy J., Yock, Torunn I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34574
_version_ 1785026678657908736
author Baliga, Sujith
Adams, Judith A.
Bajaj, Benjamin V. M.
Van Benthuysen, Liam
Daartz, Juliane
Gallotto, Sara L.
Lewy, Jacqueline R.
DeNunzio, Nicholas
Weyman, Elizabeth A.
Lawell, Miranda P.
Palmer, Joshua D.
Yeap, Beow Y.
Ebb, David H.
Huang, Mary S.
Perry, Alisa F.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Jones, Robin M.
Tarbell, Nancy J.
Yock, Torunn I.
author_facet Baliga, Sujith
Adams, Judith A.
Bajaj, Benjamin V. M.
Van Benthuysen, Liam
Daartz, Juliane
Gallotto, Sara L.
Lewy, Jacqueline R.
DeNunzio, Nicholas
Weyman, Elizabeth A.
Lawell, Miranda P.
Palmer, Joshua D.
Yeap, Beow Y.
Ebb, David H.
Huang, Mary S.
Perry, Alisa F.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Jones, Robin M.
Tarbell, Nancy J.
Yock, Torunn I.
author_sort Baliga, Sujith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve cognitive function in adult patients with cancer treated with whole‐brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. However, the feasibility of HA in pediatric patients with brain tumors has not been explored because of concerns of increased risk of relapse in the peri‐hippocampal region. Our aim was to determine patterns of recurrence and incidence of peri‐hippocampal relapse in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified pediatric patients with MB treated with protons between 2002 and 2016 and who had recurrent disease. To estimate the risk of peri‐hippocampal recurrence, three hippocampal zones (HZs) were delineated corresponding to ≤5 mm (HZ‐1), 6 to 10 mm (HZ‐2), and >10 mm (HZ‐3) distance of the recurrence from the contoured hippocampi. To determine the feasibility of HA, three standard‐risk patients with MB were planned using either volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. RESULTS: Thirty‐eight patients developed a recurrence at a median of 1.6 years. Of the 25 patients who had magnetic resonance imaging of the recurrence, no patients failed within the hippocampus and only two patients failed within HZ‐1. The crude incidence of peri‐hippocampal failure was 8%. Both HA‐VMAT and HA‐IMPT plans were associated with significantly reduced mean dose to the hippocampi (p < .05). HA‐VMAT and HA‐IMPT plans were associated with decreased percentage of the third and lateral ventricles receiving the prescription craniospinal dose of 23.4 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Peri‐hippocampal failures are uncommon in pediatric patients with MB. Hippocampal avoidance should be evaluated in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with MB. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, the patterns of disease recurrence in patients with a pediatric brain tumor known as medulloblastoma treated with proton radiotherapy were examined. The majority of failures occur outside of an important structure related to memory formation called the hippocampus. Hippocampal sparing radiation plans using proton radiotherapy were generated and showed that dose to the hippocampus was able to be significantly reduced. The study provides the rationale to explore hippocampal sparing in pediatric medulloblastoma in a prospective clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101077702023-04-18 Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing Baliga, Sujith Adams, Judith A. Bajaj, Benjamin V. M. Van Benthuysen, Liam Daartz, Juliane Gallotto, Sara L. Lewy, Jacqueline R. DeNunzio, Nicholas Weyman, Elizabeth A. Lawell, Miranda P. Palmer, Joshua D. Yeap, Beow Y. Ebb, David H. Huang, Mary S. Perry, Alisa F. MacDonald, Shannon M. Jones, Robin M. Tarbell, Nancy J. Yock, Torunn I. Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve cognitive function in adult patients with cancer treated with whole‐brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. However, the feasibility of HA in pediatric patients with brain tumors has not been explored because of concerns of increased risk of relapse in the peri‐hippocampal region. Our aim was to determine patterns of recurrence and incidence of peri‐hippocampal relapse in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified pediatric patients with MB treated with protons between 2002 and 2016 and who had recurrent disease. To estimate the risk of peri‐hippocampal recurrence, three hippocampal zones (HZs) were delineated corresponding to ≤5 mm (HZ‐1), 6 to 10 mm (HZ‐2), and >10 mm (HZ‐3) distance of the recurrence from the contoured hippocampi. To determine the feasibility of HA, three standard‐risk patients with MB were planned using either volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. RESULTS: Thirty‐eight patients developed a recurrence at a median of 1.6 years. Of the 25 patients who had magnetic resonance imaging of the recurrence, no patients failed within the hippocampus and only two patients failed within HZ‐1. The crude incidence of peri‐hippocampal failure was 8%. Both HA‐VMAT and HA‐IMPT plans were associated with significantly reduced mean dose to the hippocampi (p < .05). HA‐VMAT and HA‐IMPT plans were associated with decreased percentage of the third and lateral ventricles receiving the prescription craniospinal dose of 23.4 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Peri‐hippocampal failures are uncommon in pediatric patients with MB. Hippocampal avoidance should be evaluated in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with MB. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, the patterns of disease recurrence in patients with a pediatric brain tumor known as medulloblastoma treated with proton radiotherapy were examined. The majority of failures occur outside of an important structure related to memory formation called the hippocampus. Hippocampal sparing radiation plans using proton radiotherapy were generated and showed that dose to the hippocampus was able to be significantly reduced. The study provides the rationale to explore hippocampal sparing in pediatric medulloblastoma in a prospective clinical trial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-11 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10107770/ /pubmed/36504293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34574 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Baliga, Sujith
Adams, Judith A.
Bajaj, Benjamin V. M.
Van Benthuysen, Liam
Daartz, Juliane
Gallotto, Sara L.
Lewy, Jacqueline R.
DeNunzio, Nicholas
Weyman, Elizabeth A.
Lawell, Miranda P.
Palmer, Joshua D.
Yeap, Beow Y.
Ebb, David H.
Huang, Mary S.
Perry, Alisa F.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Jones, Robin M.
Tarbell, Nancy J.
Yock, Torunn I.
Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title_full Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title_fullStr Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title_short Patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
title_sort patterns of failure in pediatric medulloblastoma and implications for hippocampal sparing
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34574
work_keys_str_mv AT baligasujith patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT adamsjuditha patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT bajajbenjaminvm patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT vanbenthuysenliam patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT daartzjuliane patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT gallottosaral patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT lewyjacqueliner patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT denunzionicholas patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT weymanelizabetha patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT lawellmirandap patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT palmerjoshuad patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT yeapbeowy patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT ebbdavidh patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT huangmarys patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT perryalisaf patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT macdonaldshannonm patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT jonesrobinm patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT tarbellnancyj patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing
AT yocktorunni patternsoffailureinpediatricmedulloblastomaandimplicationsforhippocampalsparing