Cargando…

A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK

Legal problems can be cause and consequence of ill‐health and homelessness, necessitating efforts to integrate responses to these challenges. How to respond to legal issues within the context of health services for people who are homeless is though unclear. Groundswell piloted providing legal suppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guise, Andy, Burrows, Martin, Marshall, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.14111
_version_ 1785026683831582720
author Guise, Andy
Burrows, Martin
Marshall, Adam
author_facet Guise, Andy
Burrows, Martin
Marshall, Adam
author_sort Guise, Andy
collection PubMed
description Legal problems can be cause and consequence of ill‐health and homelessness, necessitating efforts to integrate responses to these challenges. How to respond to legal issues within the context of health services for people who are homeless is though unclear. Groundswell piloted providing legal support to peer advocates (who have current or past experience of homelessness) and clients currently homeless in addition to their health‐focused work. A participatory action‐research design evaluated the emerging programme. Groundswell staff, both researchers and those involved in service delivery, co‐led the research alongside an external researcher. Qualitative methods were used to understand the experiences of legal support. We interviewed peer advocates and volunteers (n = 8), Groundswell clients (n = 3) and sector stakeholders (n = 3). Interviews were linked to regular reflective recorded meetings (n = 7) where Groundswell staff and researchers discussed the programme and the evaluation. Data were analysed thematically. The findings focus on three themes. First, peer advocates' and clients' legal needs involve an experience of being overwhelmed by system complexity. Second, the legal support to peer advocates aided in brokering and signposting to other legal support, in the context of a supportive organisational culture. Third, support to clients can be effective, although the complexity of legal need undermines potential for sustainable responses. In conclusion, legal support for peer advocates should be developed by Groundswell and considered by other similar agencies. Legal support to people who are currently street homeless requires significant resources and so health‐focused third‐sector organisations maybe unable to offer effective support. Other modes of integration should be pursued. Findings also have implications for how the third sector relates to the government agencies implicated in the legal challenges facing people who are homeless.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101077912023-04-18 A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK Guise, Andy Burrows, Martin Marshall, Adam Health Soc Care Community Original Articles Legal problems can be cause and consequence of ill‐health and homelessness, necessitating efforts to integrate responses to these challenges. How to respond to legal issues within the context of health services for people who are homeless is though unclear. Groundswell piloted providing legal support to peer advocates (who have current or past experience of homelessness) and clients currently homeless in addition to their health‐focused work. A participatory action‐research design evaluated the emerging programme. Groundswell staff, both researchers and those involved in service delivery, co‐led the research alongside an external researcher. Qualitative methods were used to understand the experiences of legal support. We interviewed peer advocates and volunteers (n = 8), Groundswell clients (n = 3) and sector stakeholders (n = 3). Interviews were linked to regular reflective recorded meetings (n = 7) where Groundswell staff and researchers discussed the programme and the evaluation. Data were analysed thematically. The findings focus on three themes. First, peer advocates' and clients' legal needs involve an experience of being overwhelmed by system complexity. Second, the legal support to peer advocates aided in brokering and signposting to other legal support, in the context of a supportive organisational culture. Third, support to clients can be effective, although the complexity of legal need undermines potential for sustainable responses. In conclusion, legal support for peer advocates should be developed by Groundswell and considered by other similar agencies. Legal support to people who are currently street homeless requires significant resources and so health‐focused third‐sector organisations maybe unable to offer effective support. Other modes of integration should be pursued. Findings also have implications for how the third sector relates to the government agencies implicated in the legal challenges facing people who are homeless. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-05 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10107791/ /pubmed/36471491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.14111 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guise, Andy
Burrows, Martin
Marshall, Adam
A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title_full A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title_fullStr A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title_full_unstemmed A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title_short A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK
title_sort participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health‐focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in london, uk
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.14111
work_keys_str_mv AT guiseandy aparticipatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk
AT burrowsmartin aparticipatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk
AT marshalladam aparticipatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk
AT guiseandy participatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk
AT burrowsmartin participatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk
AT marshalladam participatoryevaluationoflegalsupportinthecontextofhealthfocusedpeeradvocacywithpeoplewhoarehomelessinlondonuk