Cargando…
Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify progn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111 |
_version_ | 1785026724723949568 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Alexandre Junior, Aloir DO Pante, Samuel Gobbi, Luis F Vicente, Marcelo G Oliboni, Arivaldir B Agostini, Ana P |
author_facet | Almeida, Alexandre Junior, Aloir DO Pante, Samuel Gobbi, Luis F Vicente, Marcelo G Oliboni, Arivaldir B Agostini, Ana P |
author_sort | Almeida, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery. METHODS: Forty-two shoulders that underwent primary RSA between September 2009 and April 2020 met the inclusion criteria and were called the arthroplasty group (AG). The control group (CG) consisted of 36 patients. The mean AFF and the mean LAF were evaluated with a digital isokinetic traction dynamometer. RESULTS: The average AFF found in the AG was 15 N, while in the CG, the average AFF was 21 N (P < .001). The average LAF in the AG was 14 N (standard deviation [SD] 8 N), while in the CG the average LAF was of 19 N (SD 6 N) (P = .002). All prognostic factors studied in the AG showed no statistical significance: dominance (AFF 0.697/LAF 0.883), previous rotator cuff repair surgery (AFF 0.786/LAF 0.821), Hamada radiological classification (AFF 0.343/LAF 0.857), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-operative evaluation of the quality of the teres minor (AFF 0.131/LAF 0.229), suture of the subscapularis at the end of the arthroplasty procedure (AFF 0.961/LAF 0.325) and postoperative complications (AFF 0.600/LAF 0.960). CONCLUSION: The mean AFF was 15 N, and the mean LAF was 14 N. The comparison of AFF and LAF with a CG showed a 25% reduction in muscle strength. It was not possible to demonstrate prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery after RSA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10107961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101079612023-04-18 Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Almeida, Alexandre Junior, Aloir DO Pante, Samuel Gobbi, Luis F Vicente, Marcelo G Oliboni, Arivaldir B Agostini, Ana P J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Original Scientific Research OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery. METHODS: Forty-two shoulders that underwent primary RSA between September 2009 and April 2020 met the inclusion criteria and were called the arthroplasty group (AG). The control group (CG) consisted of 36 patients. The mean AFF and the mean LAF were evaluated with a digital isokinetic traction dynamometer. RESULTS: The average AFF found in the AG was 15 N, while in the CG, the average AFF was 21 N (P < .001). The average LAF in the AG was 14 N (standard deviation [SD] 8 N), while in the CG the average LAF was of 19 N (SD 6 N) (P = .002). All prognostic factors studied in the AG showed no statistical significance: dominance (AFF 0.697/LAF 0.883), previous rotator cuff repair surgery (AFF 0.786/LAF 0.821), Hamada radiological classification (AFF 0.343/LAF 0.857), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-operative evaluation of the quality of the teres minor (AFF 0.131/LAF 0.229), suture of the subscapularis at the end of the arthroplasty procedure (AFF 0.961/LAF 0.325) and postoperative complications (AFF 0.600/LAF 0.960). CONCLUSION: The mean AFF was 15 N, and the mean LAF was 14 N. The comparison of AFF and LAF with a CG showed a 25% reduction in muscle strength. It was not possible to demonstrate prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery after RSA. SAGE Publications 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10107961/ /pubmed/37077712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Research Almeida, Alexandre Junior, Aloir DO Pante, Samuel Gobbi, Luis F Vicente, Marcelo G Oliboni, Arivaldir B Agostini, Ana P Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title | Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder
Arthroplasty |
title_full | Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder
Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder
Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder
Arthroplasty |
title_short | Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder
Arthroplasty |
title_sort | strength assessment after reverse shoulder
arthroplasty |
topic | Original Scientific Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidaalexandre strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT junioraloirdo strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT pantesamuel strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT gobbiluisf strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT vicentemarcelog strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT oliboniarivaldirb strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT agostinianap strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty |