Cargando…

Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify progn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Alexandre, Junior, Aloir DO, Pante, Samuel, Gobbi, Luis F, Vicente, Marcelo G, Oliboni, Arivaldir B, Agostini, Ana P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111
_version_ 1785026724723949568
author Almeida, Alexandre
Junior, Aloir DO
Pante, Samuel
Gobbi, Luis F
Vicente, Marcelo G
Oliboni, Arivaldir B
Agostini, Ana P
author_facet Almeida, Alexandre
Junior, Aloir DO
Pante, Samuel
Gobbi, Luis F
Vicente, Marcelo G
Oliboni, Arivaldir B
Agostini, Ana P
author_sort Almeida, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery. METHODS: Forty-two shoulders that underwent primary RSA between September 2009 and April 2020 met the inclusion criteria and were called the arthroplasty group (AG). The control group (CG) consisted of 36 patients. The mean AFF and the mean LAF were evaluated with a digital isokinetic traction dynamometer. RESULTS: The average AFF found in the AG was 15 N, while in the CG, the average AFF was 21 N (P < .001). The average LAF in the AG was 14 N (standard deviation [SD] 8 N), while in the CG the average LAF was of 19 N (SD 6 N) (P = .002). All prognostic factors studied in the AG showed no statistical significance: dominance (AFF 0.697/LAF 0.883), previous rotator cuff repair surgery (AFF 0.786/LAF 0.821), Hamada radiological classification (AFF 0.343/LAF 0.857), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-operative evaluation of the quality of the teres minor (AFF 0.131/LAF 0.229), suture of the subscapularis at the end of the arthroplasty procedure (AFF 0.961/LAF 0.325) and postoperative complications (AFF 0.600/LAF 0.960). CONCLUSION: The mean AFF was 15 N, and the mean LAF was 14 N. The comparison of AFF and LAF with a CG showed a 25% reduction in muscle strength. It was not possible to demonstrate prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery after RSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101079612023-04-18 Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Almeida, Alexandre Junior, Aloir DO Pante, Samuel Gobbi, Luis F Vicente, Marcelo G Oliboni, Arivaldir B Agostini, Ana P J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Original Scientific Research OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery. METHODS: Forty-two shoulders that underwent primary RSA between September 2009 and April 2020 met the inclusion criteria and were called the arthroplasty group (AG). The control group (CG) consisted of 36 patients. The mean AFF and the mean LAF were evaluated with a digital isokinetic traction dynamometer. RESULTS: The average AFF found in the AG was 15 N, while in the CG, the average AFF was 21 N (P < .001). The average LAF in the AG was 14 N (standard deviation [SD] 8 N), while in the CG the average LAF was of 19 N (SD 6 N) (P = .002). All prognostic factors studied in the AG showed no statistical significance: dominance (AFF 0.697/LAF 0.883), previous rotator cuff repair surgery (AFF 0.786/LAF 0.821), Hamada radiological classification (AFF 0.343/LAF 0.857), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-operative evaluation of the quality of the teres minor (AFF 0.131/LAF 0.229), suture of the subscapularis at the end of the arthroplasty procedure (AFF 0.961/LAF 0.325) and postoperative complications (AFF 0.600/LAF 0.960). CONCLUSION: The mean AFF was 15 N, and the mean LAF was 14 N. The comparison of AFF and LAF with a CG showed a 25% reduction in muscle strength. It was not possible to demonstrate prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery after RSA. SAGE Publications 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10107961/ /pubmed/37077712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Scientific Research
Almeida, Alexandre
Junior, Aloir DO
Pante, Samuel
Gobbi, Luis F
Vicente, Marcelo G
Oliboni, Arivaldir B
Agostini, Ana P
Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_short Strength Assessment After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_sort strength assessment after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
topic Original Scientific Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidaalexandre strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT junioraloirdo strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT pantesamuel strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT gobbiluisf strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT vicentemarcelog strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT oliboniarivaldirb strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT agostinianap strengthassessmentafterreverseshoulderarthroplasty