Cargando…
The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes
BACKGROUND: Textile dye mix (TDM) is included in the European baseline series (EBS), but it is unknown if TDM identifies all patients with a textile dye allergy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the added value of performing patch testing with individual textile dyes in addition to TDM. METHODS: Two hundred an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14260 |
_version_ | 1785026791504609280 |
---|---|
author | Nijman, Lars Rustemeyer, Thomas Franken, Sylvie M. Ipenburg, Norbertus A. |
author_facet | Nijman, Lars Rustemeyer, Thomas Franken, Sylvie M. Ipenburg, Norbertus A. |
author_sort | Nijman, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Textile dye mix (TDM) is included in the European baseline series (EBS), but it is unknown if TDM identifies all patients with a textile dye allergy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the added value of performing patch testing with individual textile dyes in addition to TDM. METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients suspected to have a contact allergy to textile dyes were patch tested between January 2015 and December 2021 with the EBS, as well as an individual textile dye test series containing textile dyes part of TDM (TDM‐dyes) and outside the scope of TDM (non‐TDM dyes). RESULTS: Fifty‐four patients (25.8%) tested positive for TDM or an individual textile dye. Disperse Orange 3 (9.6%) followed by Disperse Blue 106 (4.8%) were the most common individual textile dyes causing a positive patch test reaction. Of the 54 dye positive patients, 28 (51.9%) had a clinically relevant reaction. No clinically relevant reactions were seen in patients that solely tested positive for non‐TDM dyes. CONCLUSIONS: It is beneficial to test individual textile dyes in addition to TDM in patients suspected of having a textile dye allergy. Otherwise, 46.3% of the dye positive patients and 35.7% of the patients with a clinically relevant reaction would have been missed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10108160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101081602023-04-18 The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes Nijman, Lars Rustemeyer, Thomas Franken, Sylvie M. Ipenburg, Norbertus A. Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Textile dye mix (TDM) is included in the European baseline series (EBS), but it is unknown if TDM identifies all patients with a textile dye allergy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the added value of performing patch testing with individual textile dyes in addition to TDM. METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients suspected to have a contact allergy to textile dyes were patch tested between January 2015 and December 2021 with the EBS, as well as an individual textile dye test series containing textile dyes part of TDM (TDM‐dyes) and outside the scope of TDM (non‐TDM dyes). RESULTS: Fifty‐four patients (25.8%) tested positive for TDM or an individual textile dye. Disperse Orange 3 (9.6%) followed by Disperse Blue 106 (4.8%) were the most common individual textile dyes causing a positive patch test reaction. Of the 54 dye positive patients, 28 (51.9%) had a clinically relevant reaction. No clinically relevant reactions were seen in patients that solely tested positive for non‐TDM dyes. CONCLUSIONS: It is beneficial to test individual textile dyes in addition to TDM in patients suspected of having a textile dye allergy. Otherwise, 46.3% of the dye positive patients and 35.7% of the patients with a clinically relevant reaction would have been missed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-12 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10108160/ /pubmed/36461774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14260 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nijman, Lars Rustemeyer, Thomas Franken, Sylvie M. Ipenburg, Norbertus A. The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title | The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title_full | The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title_fullStr | The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title_short | The prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
title_sort | prevalence and relevance of patch testing with textile dyes |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nijmanlars theprevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT rustemeyerthomas theprevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT frankensylviem theprevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT ipenburgnorbertusa theprevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT nijmanlars prevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT rustemeyerthomas prevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT frankensylviem prevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes AT ipenburgnorbertusa prevalenceandrelevanceofpatchtestingwithtextiledyes |