Cargando…

Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010

PURPOSE: Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are acknowledged as novel inflammatory markers. However, studies investigating the correlation between inflammatory markers and osteoporosis (OP) remain scarce. We aimed to investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Shuai, Sun, Xiaohe, Jin, Jie, Zhou, Guowei, Li, Zhiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03795-5
_version_ 1785026870385836032
author Chen, Shuai
Sun, Xiaohe
Jin, Jie
Zhou, Guowei
Li, Zhiwei
author_facet Chen, Shuai
Sun, Xiaohe
Jin, Jie
Zhou, Guowei
Li, Zhiwei
author_sort Chen, Shuai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are acknowledged as novel inflammatory markers. However, studies investigating the correlation between inflammatory markers and osteoporosis (OP) remain scarce. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NLR, MLR, PLR and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: A total of 9054 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included in the study. MLR, NLR and PLR were calculated for each patient based on routine blood tests. Given the complex study design and sample weights, the relationship between inflammatory markers and BMD was evaluated through weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression and smooth curve fittings. In addition, several subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the outcomes. RESULTS: This study observed no significant relationship between MLR and lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.604). However, NLR was positively correlated with lumbar spine BMD (β = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.006, P = 0.001) and PLR was negatively linked to lumbar spine BMD (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.001 to − 0.000, P = 0.002) after accounting for covariates. When bone density measurements were changed to the total femur and femoral neck, PLR was still significantly positively correlated with total femur (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.001, − 0.000, P = 0.001) and femoral neck BMD (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.002, − 0.001, P < 0.001). After converting PLR to a categorical variable (quartiles), participants in the highest PLR quartile had a 0.011/cm(2) lower BMD than those in the lowest PLR quartile (β = − 0.011, 95% CI: − 0.019, − 0.004, P = 0.005). According to subgroup analyses stratified by gender and age, the negative correlation with PLR and lumbar spine BMD remained in males and age < 18 groups, but not in female and other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR were positively and negatively correlated with lumbar BMD, respectively. And PLR might serve as a potential inflammatory predictor of osteoporosis outperforming MLR and NLR. The complex correlation between the inflammation markers and bone metabolism requires further evaluation in large prospective studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03795-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10108543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101085432023-04-18 Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010 Chen, Shuai Sun, Xiaohe Jin, Jie Zhou, Guowei Li, Zhiwei J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are acknowledged as novel inflammatory markers. However, studies investigating the correlation between inflammatory markers and osteoporosis (OP) remain scarce. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NLR, MLR, PLR and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: A total of 9054 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included in the study. MLR, NLR and PLR were calculated for each patient based on routine blood tests. Given the complex study design and sample weights, the relationship between inflammatory markers and BMD was evaluated through weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression and smooth curve fittings. In addition, several subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the outcomes. RESULTS: This study observed no significant relationship between MLR and lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.604). However, NLR was positively correlated with lumbar spine BMD (β = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.006, P = 0.001) and PLR was negatively linked to lumbar spine BMD (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.001 to − 0.000, P = 0.002) after accounting for covariates. When bone density measurements were changed to the total femur and femoral neck, PLR was still significantly positively correlated with total femur (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.001, − 0.000, P = 0.001) and femoral neck BMD (β = − 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.002, − 0.001, P < 0.001). After converting PLR to a categorical variable (quartiles), participants in the highest PLR quartile had a 0.011/cm(2) lower BMD than those in the lowest PLR quartile (β = − 0.011, 95% CI: − 0.019, − 0.004, P = 0.005). According to subgroup analyses stratified by gender and age, the negative correlation with PLR and lumbar spine BMD remained in males and age < 18 groups, but not in female and other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR were positively and negatively correlated with lumbar BMD, respectively. And PLR might serve as a potential inflammatory predictor of osteoporosis outperforming MLR and NLR. The complex correlation between the inflammation markers and bone metabolism requires further evaluation in large prospective studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03795-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10108543/ /pubmed/37069682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03795-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Shuai
Sun, Xiaohe
Jin, Jie
Zhou, Guowei
Li, Zhiwei
Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title_full Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title_fullStr Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title_full_unstemmed Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title_short Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010
title_sort association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from nhanes 2007–2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03795-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshuai associationbetweeninflammatorymarkersandbonemineraldensityacrosssectionalstudyfromnhanes20072010
AT sunxiaohe associationbetweeninflammatorymarkersandbonemineraldensityacrosssectionalstudyfromnhanes20072010
AT jinjie associationbetweeninflammatorymarkersandbonemineraldensityacrosssectionalstudyfromnhanes20072010
AT zhouguowei associationbetweeninflammatorymarkersandbonemineraldensityacrosssectionalstudyfromnhanes20072010
AT lizhiwei associationbetweeninflammatorymarkersandbonemineraldensityacrosssectionalstudyfromnhanes20072010