Cargando…
Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077778 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284 |
_version_ | 1785026905293979648 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Zihang Liao, Kaifang Zhang, Yumei Han, Mengyuan Bishop, Chris Chen, Zhili Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Guochao Li, Yongming |
author_facet | Yuan, Zihang Liao, Kaifang Zhang, Yumei Han, Mengyuan Bishop, Chris Chen, Zhili Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Guochao Li, Yongming |
author_sort | Yuan, Zihang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PAP tests with four different VL threshold (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% VL) at an intensity of 85%1RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, power, and momentum were assessed before, and 10 s, 4, 8, 12, 16 minutes after the PAP condition. Repetitions of the squat in all the PAP conditions were also recorded. Only the 5% VL condition produced significant improvements in height (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038), peak power output (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038) and momentum (ES = 0.72, P = 0.041) of CMJ, and these changes appeared 8 minutes after the condition. The total number of repetitions during the 5% VL condition was significantly lower than that observed in the 15% (P = 0.003) and 20% VL (P < 0.001) trials. The results from this study indicate that 5%VL during the 2 sets preconditioning squat at 85%1RM was optimal for eliciting PAP in a CMJ exercise, and resulted in significant increases at the 8-min recovery period. The same squat condition also had the least number of repetitions. However, considering the efficiency in practice, athletes can also choose the rest time of 4-min, which can also achieve similar results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10108751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101087512023-04-18 Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes Yuan, Zihang Liao, Kaifang Zhang, Yumei Han, Mengyuan Bishop, Chris Chen, Zhili Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Guochao Li, Yongming Biol Sport Original Paper The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PAP tests with four different VL threshold (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% VL) at an intensity of 85%1RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, power, and momentum were assessed before, and 10 s, 4, 8, 12, 16 minutes after the PAP condition. Repetitions of the squat in all the PAP conditions were also recorded. Only the 5% VL condition produced significant improvements in height (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038), peak power output (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038) and momentum (ES = 0.72, P = 0.041) of CMJ, and these changes appeared 8 minutes after the condition. The total number of repetitions during the 5% VL condition was significantly lower than that observed in the 15% (P = 0.003) and 20% VL (P < 0.001) trials. The results from this study indicate that 5%VL during the 2 sets preconditioning squat at 85%1RM was optimal for eliciting PAP in a CMJ exercise, and resulted in significant increases at the 8-min recovery period. The same squat condition also had the least number of repetitions. However, considering the efficiency in practice, athletes can also choose the rest time of 4-min, which can also achieve similar results. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-09-06 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10108751/ /pubmed/37077778 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Yuan, Zihang Liao, Kaifang Zhang, Yumei Han, Mengyuan Bishop, Chris Chen, Zhili Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Guochao Li, Yongming Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title | Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title_full | Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title_fullStr | Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title_short | Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
title_sort | optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077778 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanzihang optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT liaokaifang optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT zhangyumei optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT hanmengyuan optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT bishopchris optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT chenzhili optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT zhangxiaohua optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT zhangguochao optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes AT liyongming optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes |