Cargando…

Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Zihang, Liao, Kaifang, Zhang, Yumei, Han, Mengyuan, Bishop, Chris, Chen, Zhili, Zhang, Xiaohua, Zhang, Guochao, Li, Yongming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077778
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284
_version_ 1785026905293979648
author Yuan, Zihang
Liao, Kaifang
Zhang, Yumei
Han, Mengyuan
Bishop, Chris
Chen, Zhili
Zhang, Xiaohua
Zhang, Guochao
Li, Yongming
author_facet Yuan, Zihang
Liao, Kaifang
Zhang, Yumei
Han, Mengyuan
Bishop, Chris
Chen, Zhili
Zhang, Xiaohua
Zhang, Guochao
Li, Yongming
author_sort Yuan, Zihang
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PAP tests with four different VL threshold (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% VL) at an intensity of 85%1RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, power, and momentum were assessed before, and 10 s, 4, 8, 12, 16 minutes after the PAP condition. Repetitions of the squat in all the PAP conditions were also recorded. Only the 5% VL condition produced significant improvements in height (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038), peak power output (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038) and momentum (ES = 0.72, P = 0.041) of CMJ, and these changes appeared 8 minutes after the condition. The total number of repetitions during the 5% VL condition was significantly lower than that observed in the 15% (P = 0.003) and 20% VL (P < 0.001) trials. The results from this study indicate that 5%VL during the 2 sets preconditioning squat at 85%1RM was optimal for eliciting PAP in a CMJ exercise, and resulted in significant increases at the 8-min recovery period. The same squat condition also had the least number of repetitions. However, considering the efficiency in practice, athletes can also choose the rest time of 4-min, which can also achieve similar results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10108751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101087512023-04-18 Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes Yuan, Zihang Liao, Kaifang Zhang, Yumei Han, Mengyuan Bishop, Chris Chen, Zhili Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Guochao Li, Yongming Biol Sport Original Paper The aim of this study was to determine the optimal velocity loss (VL) threshold that maximises the post activation potentiation (PAP) stimulus for achieving larger and more consistent performance gains in track and field athletes. Twenty-two athletes from athletics participated in four back squat PAP tests with four different VL threshold (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% VL) at an intensity of 85%1RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, power, and momentum were assessed before, and 10 s, 4, 8, 12, 16 minutes after the PAP condition. Repetitions of the squat in all the PAP conditions were also recorded. Only the 5% VL condition produced significant improvements in height (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038), peak power output (ES = 0.73, P = 0.038) and momentum (ES = 0.72, P = 0.041) of CMJ, and these changes appeared 8 minutes after the condition. The total number of repetitions during the 5% VL condition was significantly lower than that observed in the 15% (P = 0.003) and 20% VL (P < 0.001) trials. The results from this study indicate that 5%VL during the 2 sets preconditioning squat at 85%1RM was optimal for eliciting PAP in a CMJ exercise, and resulted in significant increases at the 8-min recovery period. The same squat condition also had the least number of repetitions. However, considering the efficiency in practice, athletes can also choose the rest time of 4-min, which can also achieve similar results. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-09-06 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10108751/ /pubmed/37077778 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Yuan, Zihang
Liao, Kaifang
Zhang, Yumei
Han, Mengyuan
Bishop, Chris
Chen, Zhili
Zhang, Xiaohua
Zhang, Guochao
Li, Yongming
Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title_full Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title_fullStr Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title_full_unstemmed Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title_short Optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
title_sort optimal velocity loss threshold for inducing post activation potentiation in track and field athletes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077778
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119284
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanzihang optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT liaokaifang optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT zhangyumei optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT hanmengyuan optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT bishopchris optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT chenzhili optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT zhangxiaohua optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT zhangguochao optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes
AT liyongming optimalvelocitylossthresholdforinducingpostactivationpotentiationintrackandfieldathletes