Cargando…
Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-inj...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077795 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454 |
_version_ | 1785026907088093184 |
---|---|
author | Bogwasi, Lone Holtzhausen, Louis Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey Botha, Tanita |
author_facet | Bogwasi, Lone Holtzhausen, Louis Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey Botha, Tanita |
author_sort | Bogwasi, Lone |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-injury rates. Literature search using Medline via PubMed, WorldCat, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus. Eligible studies were reviewed. Thirty-eight studies involving hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Majority (n = 138; 91%) were males, 80% (n = 121) sustained RF injury from kicking and 20% (n = 31) during sprinting. The myotendinous (MT), (n = 27); free tendon (FT), (n = 34), and anterior-inferior iliac spine (AIIS), (n = 91) were involved. Treatment was conservative (n = 115) or surgical (n = 37) across the subgroups. 73% (n = 27) of surgical treatments followed failed conservative treatment. The mean RTS was shorter with successful conservative treatment (MT: 1, FT: 4, AIIS avulsion: 2.9 months). Surgical RTS ranged from 2–9 months and 18 months with labral involvement. With either group, there was no re-injury within 24 months follow-up. With low certainty of evidence RF injury occurs mostly from kicking, resulting in a tear or avulsion at the FT and AIIS regions with or without a labral tear. With low certainty, findings suggest that successful conservative treatment provides a shortened RTS. Surgical treatment remains an option for failed conservative treatment of RF injuries across all subgroups. High-level studies are recommended to improve the evidence base for the treatment of this significant injury. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10108758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101087582023-04-18 Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review Bogwasi, Lone Holtzhausen, Louis Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey Botha, Tanita Biol Sport Original Paper Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-injury rates. Literature search using Medline via PubMed, WorldCat, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus. Eligible studies were reviewed. Thirty-eight studies involving hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Majority (n = 138; 91%) were males, 80% (n = 121) sustained RF injury from kicking and 20% (n = 31) during sprinting. The myotendinous (MT), (n = 27); free tendon (FT), (n = 34), and anterior-inferior iliac spine (AIIS), (n = 91) were involved. Treatment was conservative (n = 115) or surgical (n = 37) across the subgroups. 73% (n = 27) of surgical treatments followed failed conservative treatment. The mean RTS was shorter with successful conservative treatment (MT: 1, FT: 4, AIIS avulsion: 2.9 months). Surgical RTS ranged from 2–9 months and 18 months with labral involvement. With either group, there was no re-injury within 24 months follow-up. With low certainty of evidence RF injury occurs mostly from kicking, resulting in a tear or avulsion at the FT and AIIS regions with or without a labral tear. With low certainty, findings suggest that successful conservative treatment provides a shortened RTS. Surgical treatment remains an option for failed conservative treatment of RF injuries across all subgroups. High-level studies are recommended to improve the evidence base for the treatment of this significant injury. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-07-21 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10108758/ /pubmed/37077795 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bogwasi, Lone Holtzhausen, Louis Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey Botha, Tanita Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title | Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title_full | Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title_short | Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review |
title_sort | management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077795 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bogwasilone managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview AT holtzhausenlouis managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview AT jansevanrensburgdinachrista managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview AT jansenvanrensburgaudrey managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview AT bothatanita managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview |