Cargando…

Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review

Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-inj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogwasi, Lone, Holtzhausen, Louis, Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa, Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey, Botha, Tanita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077795
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454
_version_ 1785026907088093184
author Bogwasi, Lone
Holtzhausen, Louis
Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa
Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey
Botha, Tanita
author_facet Bogwasi, Lone
Holtzhausen, Louis
Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa
Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey
Botha, Tanita
author_sort Bogwasi, Lone
collection PubMed
description Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-injury rates. Literature search using Medline via PubMed, WorldCat, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus. Eligible studies were reviewed. Thirty-eight studies involving hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Majority (n = 138; 91%) were males, 80% (n = 121) sustained RF injury from kicking and 20% (n = 31) during sprinting. The myotendinous (MT), (n = 27); free tendon (FT), (n = 34), and anterior-inferior iliac spine (AIIS), (n = 91) were involved. Treatment was conservative (n = 115) or surgical (n = 37) across the subgroups. 73% (n = 27) of surgical treatments followed failed conservative treatment. The mean RTS was shorter with successful conservative treatment (MT: 1, FT: 4, AIIS avulsion: 2.9 months). Surgical RTS ranged from 2–9 months and 18 months with labral involvement. With either group, there was no re-injury within 24 months follow-up. With low certainty of evidence RF injury occurs mostly from kicking, resulting in a tear or avulsion at the FT and AIIS regions with or without a labral tear. With low certainty, findings suggest that successful conservative treatment provides a shortened RTS. Surgical treatment remains an option for failed conservative treatment of RF injuries across all subgroups. High-level studies are recommended to improve the evidence base for the treatment of this significant injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10108758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101087582023-04-18 Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review Bogwasi, Lone Holtzhausen, Louis Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey Botha, Tanita Biol Sport Original Paper Rectus femoris (RF) injury is a concern in sports. The management RF strains/tears and avulsion injuries need to be clearly outlined. A systematic review of literature on current management strategies for RF injuries, and to ascertain the efficacy thereof by the return to sport (RTS) time and re-injury rates. Literature search using Medline via PubMed, WorldCat, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus. Eligible studies were reviewed. Thirty-eight studies involving hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Majority (n = 138; 91%) were males, 80% (n = 121) sustained RF injury from kicking and 20% (n = 31) during sprinting. The myotendinous (MT), (n = 27); free tendon (FT), (n = 34), and anterior-inferior iliac spine (AIIS), (n = 91) were involved. Treatment was conservative (n = 115) or surgical (n = 37) across the subgroups. 73% (n = 27) of surgical treatments followed failed conservative treatment. The mean RTS was shorter with successful conservative treatment (MT: 1, FT: 4, AIIS avulsion: 2.9 months). Surgical RTS ranged from 2–9 months and 18 months with labral involvement. With either group, there was no re-injury within 24 months follow-up. With low certainty of evidence RF injury occurs mostly from kicking, resulting in a tear or avulsion at the FT and AIIS regions with or without a labral tear. With low certainty, findings suggest that successful conservative treatment provides a shortened RTS. Surgical treatment remains an option for failed conservative treatment of RF injuries across all subgroups. High-level studies are recommended to improve the evidence base for the treatment of this significant injury. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-07-21 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10108758/ /pubmed/37077795 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bogwasi, Lone
Holtzhausen, Louis
Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christa
Jansen van Rensburg, Audrey
Botha, Tanita
Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title_full Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title_fullStr Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title_short Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: A systematic review
title_sort management of proximal rectus femoris injuries – do we know what we’re doing?: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077795
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116454
work_keys_str_mv AT bogwasilone managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview
AT holtzhausenlouis managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview
AT jansevanrensburgdinachrista managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview
AT jansenvanrensburgaudrey managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview
AT bothatanita managementofproximalrectusfemorisinjuriesdoweknowwhatweredoingasystematicreview