Cargando…

Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?

BACKGROUND: Despite the clear theoretical link between sarcomere arrangement and force production, the relationship between muscle architecture and function remain ambiguous in vivo. METHODS: We used two frequently used ultrasound-based approaches to assess the relationships between vastus lateralis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werkhausen, Amelie, Gløersen, Øyvind, Nordez, Antoine, Paulsen, Gøran, Bojsen-Møller, Jens, Seynnes, Olivier R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077309
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15194
_version_ 1785026928769499136
author Werkhausen, Amelie
Gløersen, Øyvind
Nordez, Antoine
Paulsen, Gøran
Bojsen-Møller, Jens
Seynnes, Olivier R.
author_facet Werkhausen, Amelie
Gløersen, Øyvind
Nordez, Antoine
Paulsen, Gøran
Bojsen-Møller, Jens
Seynnes, Olivier R.
author_sort Werkhausen, Amelie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the clear theoretical link between sarcomere arrangement and force production, the relationship between muscle architecture and function remain ambiguous in vivo. METHODS: We used two frequently used ultrasound-based approaches to assess the relationships between vastus lateralis architecture parameters obtained in three common conditions of muscle lengths and contractile states, and the mechanical output of the muscle in twenty-one healthy subjects. The relationship between outcomes obtained in different conditions were also examined. Muscle architecture was analysed in panoramic ultrasound scans at rest with the knee fully extended and in regular scans at an angle close to maximum force (60°), at rest and under maximum contraction. Isokinetic and isometric strength tests were used to estimate muscle force production at various fascicle velocities. RESULTS: Measurements of fascicle length, pennation angle and thickness obtained under different experimental conditions correlated moderately with each other (r = 0.40−.74). Fascicle length measured at 60° at rest correlated with force during high-velocity knee extension (r = 0.46 at 400° s(−1)) and joint work during isokinetic knee extension (r = 0.44 at 200° s(−1) and r = 0.57 at 100° s(−1)). Muscle thickness was related to maximum force for all measurement methods (r = 0.44–0.73). However, we found no significant correlations between fascicle length or pennation angle and any measures of muscle force or work. Most correlations between architecture and force were stronger when architecture was measured at rest close to optimal length. CONCLUSION: These findings reflect methodological limitations of current approaches to measure fascicle length and pennation angle in vivo. They also highlight the limited value of static architecture measurements when reported in isolation or without direct experimental context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10108853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101088532023-04-18 Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations? Werkhausen, Amelie Gløersen, Øyvind Nordez, Antoine Paulsen, Gøran Bojsen-Møller, Jens Seynnes, Olivier R. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology BACKGROUND: Despite the clear theoretical link between sarcomere arrangement and force production, the relationship between muscle architecture and function remain ambiguous in vivo. METHODS: We used two frequently used ultrasound-based approaches to assess the relationships between vastus lateralis architecture parameters obtained in three common conditions of muscle lengths and contractile states, and the mechanical output of the muscle in twenty-one healthy subjects. The relationship between outcomes obtained in different conditions were also examined. Muscle architecture was analysed in panoramic ultrasound scans at rest with the knee fully extended and in regular scans at an angle close to maximum force (60°), at rest and under maximum contraction. Isokinetic and isometric strength tests were used to estimate muscle force production at various fascicle velocities. RESULTS: Measurements of fascicle length, pennation angle and thickness obtained under different experimental conditions correlated moderately with each other (r = 0.40−.74). Fascicle length measured at 60° at rest correlated with force during high-velocity knee extension (r = 0.46 at 400° s(−1)) and joint work during isokinetic knee extension (r = 0.44 at 200° s(−1) and r = 0.57 at 100° s(−1)). Muscle thickness was related to maximum force for all measurement methods (r = 0.44–0.73). However, we found no significant correlations between fascicle length or pennation angle and any measures of muscle force or work. Most correlations between architecture and force were stronger when architecture was measured at rest close to optimal length. CONCLUSION: These findings reflect methodological limitations of current approaches to measure fascicle length and pennation angle in vivo. They also highlight the limited value of static architecture measurements when reported in isolation or without direct experimental context. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10108853/ /pubmed/37077309 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15194 Text en ©2023 Werkhausen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Werkhausen, Amelie
Gløersen, Øyvind
Nordez, Antoine
Paulsen, Gøran
Bojsen-Møller, Jens
Seynnes, Olivier R.
Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title_full Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title_fullStr Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title_full_unstemmed Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title_short Linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
title_sort linking muscle architecture and function in vivo: conceptual or methodological limitations?
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077309
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15194
work_keys_str_mv AT werkhausenamelie linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations
AT gløersenøyvind linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations
AT nordezantoine linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations
AT paulsengøran linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations
AT bojsenmøllerjens linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations
AT seynnesolivierr linkingmusclearchitectureandfunctioninvivoconceptualormethodologicallimitations