Cargando…
P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108956/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192 |
_version_ | 1785026952019574784 |
---|---|
author | Tong, B Chiang, A Naik, G Osman, A Bull, C Donegan, M Pinczel, A Rawson, G Pitcher, G Brown, E Kwan, B Mukherjee, S Adams, R Eckert, D |
author_facet | Tong, B Chiang, A Naik, G Osman, A Bull, C Donegan, M Pinczel, A Rawson, G Pitcher, G Brown, E Kwan, B Mukherjee, S Adams, R Eckert, D |
author_sort | Tong, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype predictors differ between obese and non-obese people with OSA is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare OSA endotypes between responders and non-responders to MAS therapy in obese and non-obese individuals. 90 people with OSA (AHI>10events/h) were studied. OSA was confirmed via in-laboratory polysomnography. A detailed physiology night was subsequently performed prior to MAS therapy. OSA endotypes were estimated from the detailed physiology polysomnography using a custom-designed, validated, semiautomated script. OSA endotypes were compared between responders (residual AHI<10events/h) and non-responders to MAS therapy. Further comparisons were made between obese and non-obese groups. Responders to MAS therapy had a less collapsible upper airway; Vpassive: 93[88,96]vs.85[62,94]%Veupnea,p=0.003); Vactive: 103[95,112]vs.98[16,104] %Veupnea,p=0.008), better pharyngeal muscle compensation Vcomp: 9.8[4.3,19.6]vs.3.3[-19.1,18.6]%Veupnea,p=0.02), lower arousal threshold (114[109,144]vs. 142 [117, 177]%Veupnea,p=0.006) and tended to also have lower loop gain (0.48 ±0.1vs. 0.42±0.1,p=0.05). . These findings were similar in obese versus non-obese individuals although loop gain was significantly lower in responders versus non-responders in the non-obese (p=0.01) but not the obese group (0.97). MAS therapy was most beneficial in people with a less collapsible upper airway, good pharyngeal muscle compensation, lower arousal threshold and loop gain at baseline. Prospective assessment of OSA endotypic traits may therefore help guide treatment decisions and improve MAS therapy outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10108956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101089562023-05-15 P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity Tong, B Chiang, A Naik, G Osman, A Bull, C Donegan, M Pinczel, A Rawson, G Pitcher, G Brown, E Kwan, B Mukherjee, S Adams, R Eckert, D Sleep Adv Poster Presentations Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype predictors differ between obese and non-obese people with OSA is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare OSA endotypes between responders and non-responders to MAS therapy in obese and non-obese individuals. 90 people with OSA (AHI>10events/h) were studied. OSA was confirmed via in-laboratory polysomnography. A detailed physiology night was subsequently performed prior to MAS therapy. OSA endotypes were estimated from the detailed physiology polysomnography using a custom-designed, validated, semiautomated script. OSA endotypes were compared between responders (residual AHI<10events/h) and non-responders to MAS therapy. Further comparisons were made between obese and non-obese groups. Responders to MAS therapy had a less collapsible upper airway; Vpassive: 93[88,96]vs.85[62,94]%Veupnea,p=0.003); Vactive: 103[95,112]vs.98[16,104] %Veupnea,p=0.008), better pharyngeal muscle compensation Vcomp: 9.8[4.3,19.6]vs.3.3[-19.1,18.6]%Veupnea,p=0.02), lower arousal threshold (114[109,144]vs. 142 [117, 177]%Veupnea,p=0.006) and tended to also have lower loop gain (0.48 ±0.1vs. 0.42±0.1,p=0.05). . These findings were similar in obese versus non-obese individuals although loop gain was significantly lower in responders versus non-responders in the non-obese (p=0.01) but not the obese group (0.97). MAS therapy was most beneficial in people with a less collapsible upper airway, good pharyngeal muscle compensation, lower arousal threshold and loop gain at baseline. Prospective assessment of OSA endotypic traits may therefore help guide treatment decisions and improve MAS therapy outcomes. Oxford University Press 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10108956/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentations Tong, B Chiang, A Naik, G Osman, A Bull, C Donegan, M Pinczel, A Rawson, G Pitcher, G Brown, E Kwan, B Mukherjee, S Adams, R Eckert, D P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title | P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title_full | P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title_fullStr | P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title_short | P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
title_sort | p124 differences in osa pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity |
topic | Poster Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108956/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tongb p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT chianga p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT naikg p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT osmana p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT bullc p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT doneganm p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT pinczela p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT rawsong p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT pitcherg p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT browne p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT kwanb p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT mukherjees p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT adamsr p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity AT eckertd p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity |