Cargando…

P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity

Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, B, Chiang, A, Naik, G, Osman, A, Bull, C, Donegan, M, Pinczel, A, Rawson, G, Pitcher, G, Brown, E, Kwan, B, Mukherjee, S, Adams, R, Eckert, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108956/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192
_version_ 1785026952019574784
author Tong, B
Chiang, A
Naik, G
Osman, A
Bull, C
Donegan, M
Pinczel, A
Rawson, G
Pitcher, G
Brown, E
Kwan, B
Mukherjee, S
Adams, R
Eckert, D
author_facet Tong, B
Chiang, A
Naik, G
Osman, A
Bull, C
Donegan, M
Pinczel, A
Rawson, G
Pitcher, G
Brown, E
Kwan, B
Mukherjee, S
Adams, R
Eckert, D
author_sort Tong, B
collection PubMed
description Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype predictors differ between obese and non-obese people with OSA is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare OSA endotypes between responders and non-responders to MAS therapy in obese and non-obese individuals. 90 people with OSA (AHI>10events/h) were studied. OSA was confirmed via in-laboratory polysomnography. A detailed physiology night was subsequently performed prior to MAS therapy. OSA endotypes were estimated from the detailed physiology polysomnography using a custom-designed, validated, semiautomated script. OSA endotypes were compared between responders (residual AHI<10events/h) and non-responders to MAS therapy. Further comparisons were made between obese and non-obese groups. Responders to MAS therapy had a less collapsible upper airway; Vpassive: 93[88,96]vs.85[62,94]%Veupnea,p=0.003); Vactive: 103[95,112]vs.98[16,104] %Veupnea,p=0.008), better pharyngeal muscle compensation Vcomp: 9.8[4.3,19.6]vs.3.3[-19.1,18.6]%Veupnea,p=0.02), lower arousal threshold (114[109,144]vs. 142 [117, 177]%Veupnea,p=0.006) and tended to also have lower loop gain (0.48 ±0.1vs. 0.42±0.1,p=0.05). . These findings were similar in obese versus non-obese individuals although loop gain was significantly lower in responders versus non-responders in the non-obese (p=0.01) but not the obese group (0.97). MAS therapy was most beneficial in people with a less collapsible upper airway, good pharyngeal muscle compensation, lower arousal threshold and loop gain at baseline. Prospective assessment of OSA endotypic traits may therefore help guide treatment decisions and improve MAS therapy outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10108956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101089562023-05-15 P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity Tong, B Chiang, A Naik, G Osman, A Bull, C Donegan, M Pinczel, A Rawson, G Pitcher, G Brown, E Kwan, B Mukherjee, S Adams, R Eckert, D Sleep Adv Poster Presentations Mandibular advancement therapy (MAS) is a recognised second-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, MAS treatment outcomes vary and are difficult to predict. Recent studies have investigated the role of OSA endotypes to predict MAS therapy outcomes. However, whether OSA endotype predictors differ between obese and non-obese people with OSA is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare OSA endotypes between responders and non-responders to MAS therapy in obese and non-obese individuals. 90 people with OSA (AHI>10events/h) were studied. OSA was confirmed via in-laboratory polysomnography. A detailed physiology night was subsequently performed prior to MAS therapy. OSA endotypes were estimated from the detailed physiology polysomnography using a custom-designed, validated, semiautomated script. OSA endotypes were compared between responders (residual AHI<10events/h) and non-responders to MAS therapy. Further comparisons were made between obese and non-obese groups. Responders to MAS therapy had a less collapsible upper airway; Vpassive: 93[88,96]vs.85[62,94]%Veupnea,p=0.003); Vactive: 103[95,112]vs.98[16,104] %Veupnea,p=0.008), better pharyngeal muscle compensation Vcomp: 9.8[4.3,19.6]vs.3.3[-19.1,18.6]%Veupnea,p=0.02), lower arousal threshold (114[109,144]vs. 142 [117, 177]%Veupnea,p=0.006) and tended to also have lower loop gain (0.48 ±0.1vs. 0.42±0.1,p=0.05). . These findings were similar in obese versus non-obese individuals although loop gain was significantly lower in responders versus non-responders in the non-obese (p=0.01) but not the obese group (0.97). MAS therapy was most beneficial in people with a less collapsible upper airway, good pharyngeal muscle compensation, lower arousal threshold and loop gain at baseline. Prospective assessment of OSA endotypic traits may therefore help guide treatment decisions and improve MAS therapy outcomes. Oxford University Press 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10108956/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Presentations
Tong, B
Chiang, A
Naik, G
Osman, A
Bull, C
Donegan, M
Pinczel, A
Rawson, G
Pitcher, G
Brown, E
Kwan, B
Mukherjee, S
Adams, R
Eckert, D
P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title_full P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title_fullStr P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title_full_unstemmed P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title_short P124 Differences in OSA pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
title_sort p124 differences in osa pathophysiological traits between mandibular advancement therapy responders versus non-responses and the influence of obesity
topic Poster Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108956/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.192
work_keys_str_mv AT tongb p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT chianga p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT naikg p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT osmana p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT bullc p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT doneganm p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT pinczela p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT rawsong p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT pitcherg p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT browne p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT kwanb p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT mukherjees p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT adamsr p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity
AT eckertd p124differencesinosapathophysiologicaltraitsbetweenmandibularadvancementtherapyrespondersversusnonresponsesandtheinfluenceofobesity