Cargando…
P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements
INTRODUCTION: Research and guidance materials addressing on-call work typically focus on a narrow set of industries (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, modern working arrangements are changing. The casualisation of many industries, combined with the rise in online and app-based working...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10109138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.183 |
_version_ | 1785026995396018176 |
---|---|
author | Sprajcer, M Appleton, S Adams, R Gill, T Ferguson, S Vincent, G Paterson, J Reynolds, A |
author_facet | Sprajcer, M Appleton, S Adams, R Gill, T Ferguson, S Vincent, G Paterson, J Reynolds, A |
author_sort | Sprajcer, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Research and guidance materials addressing on-call work typically focus on a narrow set of industries (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, modern working arrangements are changing. The casualisation of many industries, combined with the rise in online and app-based working arrangements, means that many workers who can be called to work are not included in current on-call literature. We therefore present a proposed taxonomy for classifying a broader range of on-call workers, based on the work and sociodemographic characteristics of on-call workers in Australia. METHODS: Work arrangements and sociodemographic factors of 1057 Australian adults were assessed in a survey. Questions addressed on-call work undertaken in the previous three months, occupation, work hours, and any non-standard working conditions. RESULTS: At least one workday characterised as ‘on-call’ was reported by 45.5% of respondents, with a higher prevalence in younger individuals (63.1% of respondents aged 18–24 years reported working on-call). On-call work was reported in a range of industries, including management, community and personal service workers, sales workers, machinery operators, and drivers. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that previous reports of on-call work prevalence (typically based on traditional on-call industries such as emergency services) likely underestimate the proportion of individuals who consider themselves on-call workers. As a result, on-call work requires a novel classification system that is able to capture non-traditional on-call work and can differentiate between types of on-call working arrangements. A taxonomy including traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work is presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10109138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101091382023-05-15 P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements Sprajcer, M Appleton, S Adams, R Gill, T Ferguson, S Vincent, G Paterson, J Reynolds, A Sleep Adv Poster Presentations INTRODUCTION: Research and guidance materials addressing on-call work typically focus on a narrow set of industries (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, modern working arrangements are changing. The casualisation of many industries, combined with the rise in online and app-based working arrangements, means that many workers who can be called to work are not included in current on-call literature. We therefore present a proposed taxonomy for classifying a broader range of on-call workers, based on the work and sociodemographic characteristics of on-call workers in Australia. METHODS: Work arrangements and sociodemographic factors of 1057 Australian adults were assessed in a survey. Questions addressed on-call work undertaken in the previous three months, occupation, work hours, and any non-standard working conditions. RESULTS: At least one workday characterised as ‘on-call’ was reported by 45.5% of respondents, with a higher prevalence in younger individuals (63.1% of respondents aged 18–24 years reported working on-call). On-call work was reported in a range of industries, including management, community and personal service workers, sales workers, machinery operators, and drivers. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that previous reports of on-call work prevalence (typically based on traditional on-call industries such as emergency services) likely underestimate the proportion of individuals who consider themselves on-call workers. As a result, on-call work requires a novel classification system that is able to capture non-traditional on-call work and can differentiate between types of on-call working arrangements. A taxonomy including traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work is presented. Oxford University Press 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10109138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.183 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentations Sprajcer, M Appleton, S Adams, R Gill, T Ferguson, S Vincent, G Paterson, J Reynolds, A P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title | P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title_full | P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title_fullStr | P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title_full_unstemmed | P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title_short | P114 How should we classify on-call workers? A proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
title_sort | p114 how should we classify on-call workers? a proposed taxonomy for modern working arrangements |
topic | Poster Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10109138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sprajcerm p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT appletons p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT adamsr p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT gillt p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT fergusons p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT vincentg p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT patersonj p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements AT reynoldsa p114howshouldweclassifyoncallworkersaproposedtaxonomyformodernworkingarrangements |