Cargando…

Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction

INTRODUCTION: Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is currently unreliable. Lower baseline AHI has been associated with better MAS response but is a poor predictor on its own. Imaging markers may enhance prediction. We investigate how th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jugé, L, Knapman, F, Humburg, P, Burke, P, Lowth, A, Brown, E, Butler, J, Eckert, D, Ngiam, J, Sutherland, K, Cistulli, P, Bilston, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10109162/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.025
_version_ 1785027001201983488
author Jugé, L
Knapman, F
Humburg, P
Burke, P
Lowth, A
Brown, E
Butler, J
Eckert, D
Ngiam, J
Sutherland, K
Cistulli, P
Bilston, L
author_facet Jugé, L
Knapman, F
Humburg, P
Burke, P
Lowth, A
Brown, E
Butler, J
Eckert, D
Ngiam, J
Sutherland, K
Cistulli, P
Bilston, L
author_sort Jugé, L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is currently unreliable. Lower baseline AHI has been associated with better MAS response but is a poor predictor on its own. Imaging markers may enhance prediction. We investigate how the upper airway enlarges via posterior tongue advancement, using tagged MRI during mandibular advancement, as a potential predictor of MAS treatment response. METHODS: 101 untreated OSA participants (AHI 10–102 events/hr) underwent an MRI scan wearing a MAS. Mid-sagittal tagged MRI images were collected to quantify tongue movement during passive jaw advancement. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of the maximum protrusion. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: 71 participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI<5 or AHI≤10 events/hr with >50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (>50% AHI reduction but AHI>10 events/hr), and 27 non-responders (AHI reduction<50% and AHI≥10 events/hr). Responders had the greatest naso- and oropharyngeal tongue advancement (0.40±0.08 and 0.47±0.13mm, respectively) and oropharynx enlargement (6.41±2.12%) per millimetre of mandibular advancement. The inclusion of these imaging markers along with baseline AHI in a multivariate model classified more patients in the right MAS response group (69.2%) than a model based only on baseline AHI (50.0%) when the mandible was advanced by at least 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improves MAS treatment response categorisation to a satisfactory level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10109162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101091622023-05-15 Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction Jugé, L Knapman, F Humburg, P Burke, P Lowth, A Brown, E Butler, J Eckert, D Ngiam, J Sutherland, K Cistulli, P Bilston, L Sleep Adv Oral Presentations INTRODUCTION: Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is currently unreliable. Lower baseline AHI has been associated with better MAS response but is a poor predictor on its own. Imaging markers may enhance prediction. We investigate how the upper airway enlarges via posterior tongue advancement, using tagged MRI during mandibular advancement, as a potential predictor of MAS treatment response. METHODS: 101 untreated OSA participants (AHI 10–102 events/hr) underwent an MRI scan wearing a MAS. Mid-sagittal tagged MRI images were collected to quantify tongue movement during passive jaw advancement. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of the maximum protrusion. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: 71 participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI<5 or AHI≤10 events/hr with >50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (>50% AHI reduction but AHI>10 events/hr), and 27 non-responders (AHI reduction<50% and AHI≥10 events/hr). Responders had the greatest naso- and oropharyngeal tongue advancement (0.40±0.08 and 0.47±0.13mm, respectively) and oropharynx enlargement (6.41±2.12%) per millimetre of mandibular advancement. The inclusion of these imaging markers along with baseline AHI in a multivariate model classified more patients in the right MAS response group (69.2%) than a model based only on baseline AHI (50.0%) when the mandible was advanced by at least 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improves MAS treatment response categorisation to a satisfactory level. Oxford University Press 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10109162/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.025 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Oral Presentations
Jugé, L
Knapman, F
Humburg, P
Burke, P
Lowth, A
Brown, E
Butler, J
Eckert, D
Ngiam, J
Sutherland, K
Cistulli, P
Bilston, L
Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title_full Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title_fullStr Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title_full_unstemmed Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title_short Pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
title_sort pharyngeal enlargement via tongue advancement differs with mandibular advancement therapy response and improves treatment prediction
topic Oral Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10109162/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab014.025
work_keys_str_mv AT jugel pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT knapmanf pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT humburgp pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT burkep pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT lowtha pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT browne pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT butlerj pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT eckertd pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT ngiamj pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT sutherlandk pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT cistullip pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction
AT bilstonl pharyngealenlargementviatongueadvancementdifferswithmandibularadvancementtherapyresponseandimprovestreatmentprediction