Cargando…

“Using Crowd-Sourced Data to Explore Police-Related-Deaths in the United States (2000–2017): The Case of Fatal Encounters”

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the Fatal Encounters (FE) database as an open-source surveillance system for tracking police-related deaths (PRDs). METHODS: We compared the coverage of FE data to several known government sources of police-related deaths and police homicide data. We also replicated incident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finch, Brian Karl, Beck, Audrey, Burghart, D. Brian, Johnson, Richard, Klinger, David, Thomas, Kyla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10109543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073367
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ohd.30
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the Fatal Encounters (FE) database as an open-source surveillance system for tracking police-related deaths (PRDs). METHODS: We compared the coverage of FE data to several known government sources of police-related deaths and police homicide data. We also replicated incident selection from a recent review of the National Violent Death Reporting System. RESULTS: FE collected data on n = 23,578 PRDs from 2000–2017. A pilot study and ongoing data integration suggest greater coverage than extant data sets. Advantages of the FE data include circumstance of death specificity, incident geo-locations, identification of involved police-agencies, and near immediate availability of data. Disadvantages include a high rate of missingness for decedent race/ethnicity, potentially higher rates of missing incidents in older data, and the exclusion of more comprehensive police use-of-force and nonlethal use-of-force data—a critique applicable to all extant data sets. CONCLUSIONS: FE is the largest collection of PRDs in the United States and remains as the most likely source for historical trend comparisons and police-department level analyses of the causes of PRDs.