Cargando…

Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction

Background and study aims  For distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have a larger inner diameter compared to plastic stents, which prolongs time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), although stent-related complications are still a problem. This study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harai, Shota, Hijioka, Susumu, Nagashio, Yoshikuni, Ohba, Akihiro, Maruki, Yuta, Yamashige, Daiki, Hisada, Yuya, Yoshinari, Motohiro, Kitamura, Hidetoshi, Maehara, Kosuke, Murashima, Yumi, Kawasaki, Yuki, Koga, Takehiko, Takeshita, Kotaro, Ueno, Hideki, Kondo, Shunsuke, Morizane, Chigusa, Fukasawa, Mitsuharu, Sone, Miyuki, Saito, Yutaka, Enomoto, Nobuyuki, Okusaka, Takuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10110359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-4316
_version_ 1785027246532067328
author Harai, Shota
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Yamashige, Daiki
Hisada, Yuya
Yoshinari, Motohiro
Kitamura, Hidetoshi
Maehara, Kosuke
Murashima, Yumi
Kawasaki, Yuki
Koga, Takehiko
Takeshita, Kotaro
Ueno, Hideki
Kondo, Shunsuke
Morizane, Chigusa
Fukasawa, Mitsuharu
Sone, Miyuki
Saito, Yutaka
Enomoto, Nobuyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
author_facet Harai, Shota
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Yamashige, Daiki
Hisada, Yuya
Yoshinari, Motohiro
Kitamura, Hidetoshi
Maehara, Kosuke
Murashima, Yumi
Kawasaki, Yuki
Koga, Takehiko
Takeshita, Kotaro
Ueno, Hideki
Kondo, Shunsuke
Morizane, Chigusa
Fukasawa, Mitsuharu
Sone, Miyuki
Saito, Yutaka
Enomoto, Nobuyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
author_sort Harai, Shota
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  For distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have a larger inner diameter compared to plastic stents, which prolongs time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), although stent-related complications are still a problem. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between using 10– and 6-mm-diameter fully-covered SEMS (FCSEMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Patients and methods  This single-center, retrospective study included patients with 10-mm or 6-mm-diameter FCSEMS to treat distal malignant biliary obstruction. Clinical success, stent-related adverse events (AEs), cumulative incidence of RBO, factors involved in stent-related AEs, and factors involved in RBO were evaluated. Results  There were 243 eligible cases between October 2017 and December 2021. The cumulative incidence of RBO did not differ significantly between the 10-mm and 6-mm groups. Stent-related AEs occurred in 31.6 % and 11.4 % of patients between the 10-mm and 6-mm groups, respectively ( P  < 0.01). Pancreatitis occurred in 10.5 % and 3.6 % ( P  = 0.04) and cholecystitis occurred in 11.8 % and 3.0 % of patients ( P  = 0.03) in the 10-mm and 6-mm groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the 6-mm stent was extracted as a factor linked to a reduced risk of AEs, but not as a risk factor of RBO. Conclusions  The 6-mm-diameter FCSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction is a well-balanced stent with a cumulative incidence of RBO compatible to that of the 10-mm-diameter FCSEMS and fewer stent-related AEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10110359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101103592023-04-18 Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction Harai, Shota Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yoshikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Yamashige, Daiki Hisada, Yuya Yoshinari, Motohiro Kitamura, Hidetoshi Maehara, Kosuke Murashima, Yumi Kawasaki, Yuki Koga, Takehiko Takeshita, Kotaro Ueno, Hideki Kondo, Shunsuke Morizane, Chigusa Fukasawa, Mitsuharu Sone, Miyuki Saito, Yutaka Enomoto, Nobuyuki Okusaka, Takuji Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  For distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have a larger inner diameter compared to plastic stents, which prolongs time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), although stent-related complications are still a problem. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between using 10– and 6-mm-diameter fully-covered SEMS (FCSEMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Patients and methods  This single-center, retrospective study included patients with 10-mm or 6-mm-diameter FCSEMS to treat distal malignant biliary obstruction. Clinical success, stent-related adverse events (AEs), cumulative incidence of RBO, factors involved in stent-related AEs, and factors involved in RBO were evaluated. Results  There were 243 eligible cases between October 2017 and December 2021. The cumulative incidence of RBO did not differ significantly between the 10-mm and 6-mm groups. Stent-related AEs occurred in 31.6 % and 11.4 % of patients between the 10-mm and 6-mm groups, respectively ( P  < 0.01). Pancreatitis occurred in 10.5 % and 3.6 % ( P  = 0.04) and cholecystitis occurred in 11.8 % and 3.0 % of patients ( P  = 0.03) in the 10-mm and 6-mm groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the 6-mm stent was extracted as a factor linked to a reduced risk of AEs, but not as a risk factor of RBO. Conclusions  The 6-mm-diameter FCSEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction is a well-balanced stent with a cumulative incidence of RBO compatible to that of the 10-mm-diameter FCSEMS and fewer stent-related AEs. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10110359/ /pubmed/37077662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-4316 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Harai, Shota
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Yamashige, Daiki
Hisada, Yuya
Yoshinari, Motohiro
Kitamura, Hidetoshi
Maehara, Kosuke
Murashima, Yumi
Kawasaki, Yuki
Koga, Takehiko
Takeshita, Kotaro
Ueno, Hideki
Kondo, Shunsuke
Morizane, Chigusa
Fukasawa, Mitsuharu
Sone, Miyuki
Saito, Yutaka
Enomoto, Nobuyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title_full Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title_short Comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
title_sort comparison of 6-mm and 10-mm-diameter, fully-covered, self-expandable metallic stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10110359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37077662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2039-4316
work_keys_str_mv AT haraishota comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT hijiokasusumu comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT nagashioyoshikuni comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT ohbaakihiro comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT marukiyuta comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT yamashigedaiki comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT hisadayuya comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT yoshinarimotohiro comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT kitamurahidetoshi comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT maeharakosuke comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT murashimayumi comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT kawasakiyuki comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT kogatakehiko comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT takeshitakotaro comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT uenohideki comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT kondoshunsuke comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT morizanechigusa comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT fukasawamitsuharu comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT sonemiyuki comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT saitoyutaka comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT enomotonobuyuki comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction
AT okusakatakuji comparisonof6mmand10mmdiameterfullycoveredselfexpandablemetallicstentsfordistalmalignantbiliaryobstruction