Cargando…

Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that an awake prone position may be beneficial for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) in patients with COVID-19, but the results are not consistent, especially in terms of oxygenation outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Qing, Yang, Sheng, Zhang, Yu, Zhao, Wenjie, Hu, Man, Meng, Bo, Ni, Huanhuan, Min, Lingfeng, Yu, Jiangquan, Wang, Yongxiang, Zhang, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1120837
_version_ 1785027383272669184
author Peng, Qing
Yang, Sheng
Zhang, Yu
Zhao, Wenjie
Hu, Man
Meng, Bo
Ni, Huanhuan
Min, Lingfeng
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Yongxiang
Zhang, Liang
author_facet Peng, Qing
Yang, Sheng
Zhang, Yu
Zhao, Wenjie
Hu, Man
Meng, Bo
Ni, Huanhuan
Min, Lingfeng
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Yongxiang
Zhang, Liang
author_sort Peng, Qing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that an awake prone position may be beneficial for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) in patients with COVID-19, but the results are not consistent, especially in terms of oxygenation outcomes and intubation rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of the awake prone position on AHRF in patients with COVID-19 with all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: An extensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 December 2019 to 30 October 2022, with no language restrictions was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis are based on the PRISMA statement. We only included RCTs and used the Cochrane risk assessment tool for quality assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria, and 3,290 patients were included. A meta-analysis found that patients in the awake prone position group had more significant improvement in the SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio [mean difference (MD): 29.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39–48.13; P = 0.001] compared with the usual care. The prone position also reduced the need for intubation [odd ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.84; P < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%]. There was no significant difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The awake prone position was a promising intervention method, which is beneficial to improve the oxygenation of patients with ARDS or AHRF caused by COVID-19 and reduce the need for intubation. However, the awake prone position showed no obvious advantage in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of ICU admission, and adverse events. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022367885.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101110562023-04-19 Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Peng, Qing Yang, Sheng Zhang, Yu Zhao, Wenjie Hu, Man Meng, Bo Ni, Huanhuan Min, Lingfeng Yu, Jiangquan Wang, Yongxiang Zhang, Liang Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that an awake prone position may be beneficial for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) in patients with COVID-19, but the results are not consistent, especially in terms of oxygenation outcomes and intubation rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of the awake prone position on AHRF in patients with COVID-19 with all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: An extensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 December 2019 to 30 October 2022, with no language restrictions was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis are based on the PRISMA statement. We only included RCTs and used the Cochrane risk assessment tool for quality assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria, and 3,290 patients were included. A meta-analysis found that patients in the awake prone position group had more significant improvement in the SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio [mean difference (MD): 29.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39–48.13; P = 0.001] compared with the usual care. The prone position also reduced the need for intubation [odd ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.84; P < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%]. There was no significant difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The awake prone position was a promising intervention method, which is beneficial to improve the oxygenation of patients with ARDS or AHRF caused by COVID-19 and reduce the need for intubation. However, the awake prone position showed no obvious advantage in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of ICU admission, and adverse events. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022367885. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10111056/ /pubmed/37081841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1120837 Text en Copyright © 2023 Peng, Yang, Zhang, Zhao, Hu, Meng, Ni, Min, Yu, Wang and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Peng, Qing
Yang, Sheng
Zhang, Yu
Zhao, Wenjie
Hu, Man
Meng, Bo
Ni, Huanhuan
Min, Lingfeng
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Yongxiang
Zhang, Liang
Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1120837
work_keys_str_mv AT pengqing effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangsheng effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangyu effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhaowenjie effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT human effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mengbo effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nihuanhuan effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT minlingfeng effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yujiangquan effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangyongxiang effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangliang effectsofawakepronepositionvsusualcareonacutehypoxemicrespiratoryfailureinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials