Cargando…
How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492 |
_version_ | 1785027391503990784 |
---|---|
author | Medvescek, Eli D. Raiciulescu, Sorana Thagard, Andrew S. Shvartsman, Katerina |
author_facet | Medvescek, Eli D. Raiciulescu, Sorana Thagard, Andrew S. Shvartsman, Katerina |
author_sort | Medvescek, Eli D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019–2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10111091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society for Preventive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101110912023-04-19 How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study Medvescek, Eli D. Raiciulescu, Sorana Thagard, Andrew S. Shvartsman, Katerina J Prev Med Public Health Brief Report OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019–2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions. Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2023-03 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10111091/ /pubmed/37055361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Medvescek, Eli D. Raiciulescu, Sorana Thagard, Andrew S. Shvartsman, Katerina How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | how well do u.s. primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinicians screen for pregnancy complications at well woman visits? a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT medvescekelid howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT raiciulescusorana howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT thagardandrews howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shvartsmankaterina howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy |