Cargando…

How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medvescek, Eli D., Raiciulescu, Sorana, Thagard, Andrew S., Shvartsman, Katerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492
_version_ 1785027391503990784
author Medvescek, Eli D.
Raiciulescu, Sorana
Thagard, Andrew S.
Shvartsman, Katerina
author_facet Medvescek, Eli D.
Raiciulescu, Sorana
Thagard, Andrew S.
Shvartsman, Katerina
author_sort Medvescek, Eli D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019–2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101110912023-04-19 How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study Medvescek, Eli D. Raiciulescu, Sorana Thagard, Andrew S. Shvartsman, Katerina J Prev Med Public Health Brief Report OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019–2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions. Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2023-03 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10111091/ /pubmed/37055361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Medvescek, Eli D.
Raiciulescu, Sorana
Thagard, Andrew S.
Shvartsman, Katerina
How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort how well do u.s. primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinicians screen for pregnancy complications at well woman visits? a retrospective cohort study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.492
work_keys_str_mv AT medvescekelid howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT raiciulescusorana howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT thagardandrews howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shvartsmankaterina howwelldousprimarycareandobstetricsandgynecologycliniciansscreenforpregnancycomplicationsatwellwomanvisitsaretrospectivecohortstudy