Cargando…

How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is currently diagnosed in hospital settings. An easy and practical diagnosis of COVID-19 is needed in primary care. For this purpose, the usability of complete blood count in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was investigated. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayraktar, Mustafa, Tekin, Erdal, Kocak, Mehmet Nuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069493
_version_ 1785027407787327488
author Bayraktar, Mustafa
Tekin, Erdal
Kocak, Mehmet Nuri
author_facet Bayraktar, Mustafa
Tekin, Erdal
Kocak, Mehmet Nuri
author_sort Bayraktar, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is currently diagnosed in hospital settings. An easy and practical diagnosis of COVID-19 is needed in primary care. For this purpose, the usability of complete blood count in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was investigated. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single-centre study in a tertiary university hospital in Erzurum, Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: Between March 2020 and February 2021, patients aged 18–70 years who applied to the hospital and underwent both complete blood count and reverse-transcription-PCR tests for COVID-19 were included and compared. Conditions affecting the test parameters (oncological–haematological conditions, chronic diseases, drug usage) were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURE: The complete blood count and COVID-19 results of eligible patients identified using diagnostic codes [U07.3 (COVID–19) or Z03.8 (observation for other suspected diseases and conditions)] were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 978 patients included, 39.4% (n=385) were positive for COVID-19 and 60.6% (n=593) were negative. The mean age was 41.5±14.5 years, and 53.9% (n=527) were male. COVID-19-positive patients were found to have significantly lower leucocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, basophil, platelet and immature granulocyte (IG) values (p<0.001). Neutrophil/lymphocyte, neutrophil/monocyte and IG/lymphocyte ratios were also found to be significantly decreased (p<0.001). With logistic regression analysis, low lymphocyte count (OR 0.695; 95% CI 0.597 to 0.809) and low red cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (OR 0.887; 95% CI 0.818 to 0.962) were significantly associated with COVID-19 positivity. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cut-off values of lymphocyte and RDW-CV were 0.745 and 12.35, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although our study was designed retrospectively and reflects regional data, it is important to determine that low lymphocyte count and RDW-CV can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101111842023-04-18 How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey Bayraktar, Mustafa Tekin, Erdal Kocak, Mehmet Nuri BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is currently diagnosed in hospital settings. An easy and practical diagnosis of COVID-19 is needed in primary care. For this purpose, the usability of complete blood count in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was investigated. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single-centre study in a tertiary university hospital in Erzurum, Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: Between March 2020 and February 2021, patients aged 18–70 years who applied to the hospital and underwent both complete blood count and reverse-transcription-PCR tests for COVID-19 were included and compared. Conditions affecting the test parameters (oncological–haematological conditions, chronic diseases, drug usage) were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURE: The complete blood count and COVID-19 results of eligible patients identified using diagnostic codes [U07.3 (COVID–19) or Z03.8 (observation for other suspected diseases and conditions)] were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 978 patients included, 39.4% (n=385) were positive for COVID-19 and 60.6% (n=593) were negative. The mean age was 41.5±14.5 years, and 53.9% (n=527) were male. COVID-19-positive patients were found to have significantly lower leucocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, basophil, platelet and immature granulocyte (IG) values (p<0.001). Neutrophil/lymphocyte, neutrophil/monocyte and IG/lymphocyte ratios were also found to be significantly decreased (p<0.001). With logistic regression analysis, low lymphocyte count (OR 0.695; 95% CI 0.597 to 0.809) and low red cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (OR 0.887; 95% CI 0.818 to 0.962) were significantly associated with COVID-19 positivity. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cut-off values of lymphocyte and RDW-CV were 0.745 and 12.35, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although our study was designed retrospectively and reflects regional data, it is important to determine that low lymphocyte count and RDW-CV can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10111184/ /pubmed/37068894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069493 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Bayraktar, Mustafa
Tekin, Erdal
Kocak, Mehmet Nuri
How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title_full How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title_fullStr How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title_short How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
title_sort how to diagnose covid-19 in family practice? usability of complete blood count as a covid-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in turkey
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069493
work_keys_str_mv AT bayraktarmustafa howtodiagnosecovid19infamilypracticeusabilityofcompletebloodcountasacovid19diagnostictoolacrosssectionalstudyinturkey
AT tekinerdal howtodiagnosecovid19infamilypracticeusabilityofcompletebloodcountasacovid19diagnostictoolacrosssectionalstudyinturkey
AT kocakmehmetnuri howtodiagnosecovid19infamilypracticeusabilityofcompletebloodcountasacovid19diagnostictoolacrosssectionalstudyinturkey