Cargando…
Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory
This study investigates stock recommendations from the three largest finance subreddits on Reddit: wallstreetbets, investing and stocks. A simple strategy that buys recommended stocks weighted by the number of posts per day yields a portfolio with higher average returns at the expense of higher risk...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00084-y |
_version_ | 1785027426131116032 |
---|---|
author | Reichenbach, Felix Walther, Martin |
author_facet | Reichenbach, Felix Walther, Martin |
author_sort | Reichenbach, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigates stock recommendations from the three largest finance subreddits on Reddit: wallstreetbets, investing and stocks. A simple strategy that buys recommended stocks weighted by the number of posts per day yields a portfolio with higher average returns at the expense of higher risks than the market for all holding periods, i.e., unfavorable Sharpe ratios. Furthermore, the strategy leads to positive (insignificant) short-term and negative (significant) long-term alphas when considering common risk factors. This is consistent with the idea of “meme stocks”, meaning that the recommended stocks are artificially inflated in the short term when they are recommended, and that the posts contain no information about long-term success. However, it is likely that Reddit users, especially on the subreddit wallstreetbets, have preferences for bets which are not captured by the mean–variance framework. Therefore, we draw on cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We find that the CPT-valuations of the Reddit portfolio exceed those of the market, which may explain the persistent attractiveness for investors to follow social media stock recommendations despite the unfavorable risk-return ratio. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10111308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101113082023-04-20 Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory Reichenbach, Felix Walther, Martin Digit Finance Original Article This study investigates stock recommendations from the three largest finance subreddits on Reddit: wallstreetbets, investing and stocks. A simple strategy that buys recommended stocks weighted by the number of posts per day yields a portfolio with higher average returns at the expense of higher risks than the market for all holding periods, i.e., unfavorable Sharpe ratios. Furthermore, the strategy leads to positive (insignificant) short-term and negative (significant) long-term alphas when considering common risk factors. This is consistent with the idea of “meme stocks”, meaning that the recommended stocks are artificially inflated in the short term when they are recommended, and that the posts contain no information about long-term success. However, it is likely that Reddit users, especially on the subreddit wallstreetbets, have preferences for bets which are not captured by the mean–variance framework. Therefore, we draw on cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We find that the CPT-valuations of the Reddit portfolio exceed those of the market, which may explain the persistent attractiveness for investors to follow social media stock recommendations despite the unfavorable risk-return ratio. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10111308/ /pubmed/37362066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00084-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Reichenbach, Felix Walther, Martin Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title | Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title_full | Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title_fullStr | Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title_short | Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
title_sort | financial recommendations on reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00084-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reichenbachfelix financialrecommendationsonredditstockreturnsandcumulativeprospecttheory AT walthermartin financialrecommendationsonredditstockreturnsandcumulativeprospecttheory |