Cargando…

Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT

BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olshansky, Brian, Bhatt, Deepak L., Miller, Michael, Steg, Ph. Gabriel, Brinton, Eliot A., Jacobson, Terry A., Ketchum, Steven B., Doyle, Ralph T., Juliano, Rebecca A., Jiao, Lixia, Kowey, Peter R., Reiffel, James A., Tardif, Jean‐Claude, Ballantyne, Christie M., Chung, Mina K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756
_version_ 1785027459848077312
author Olshansky, Brian
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Miller, Michael
Steg, Ph. Gabriel
Brinton, Eliot A.
Jacobson, Terry A.
Ketchum, Steven B.
Doyle, Ralph T.
Juliano, Rebecca A.
Jiao, Lixia
Kowey, Peter R.
Reiffel, James A.
Tardif, Jean‐Claude
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Chung, Mina K.
author_facet Olshansky, Brian
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Miller, Michael
Steg, Ph. Gabriel
Brinton, Eliot A.
Jacobson, Terry A.
Ketchum, Steven B.
Doyle, Ralph T.
Juliano, Rebecca A.
Jiao, Lixia
Kowey, Peter R.
Reiffel, James A.
Tardif, Jean‐Claude
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Chung, Mina K.
author_sort Olshansky, Brian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with increased atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) hospitalization (3.1% IPE versus 2.1% placebo; P=0.004). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed post hoc efficacy and safety analyses of patients with or without prior AF (before randomization) and with or without in‐study time‐varying AF hospitalization to assess relationships of IPE (versus placebo) and outcomes. In‐study AF hospitalization event rates were higher in patients with prior AF (12.5% versus 6.3%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.007) versus without prior AF (2.2% versus 1.6%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.09). Serious bleeding rates trended higher in patients with (7.3% versus 6.0%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.59) versus without prior AF (2.3% versus 1.7%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.08). With IPE, serious bleeding trended higher regardless of prior AF (interaction P value [P (int)]=0.61) or postrandomization AF hospitalization (P (int)=0.66). Patients with prior AF (n=751, 9.2%) versus without prior AF (n=7428, 90.8%) had similar relative risk reductions of the primary composite and key secondary composite end points with IPE versus placebo (P (int)=0.37 and P (int)=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In REDUCE‐IT, in‐study AF hospitalization rates were higher in patients with prior AF especially in those randomized to IPE. Although serious bleeding trended higher in those randomized to IPE versus placebo over the course of the study, serious bleeding was not different regardless of prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization. Patients with prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization had consistent relative risk reductions across primary, key secondary, and stroke end points with IPE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01492361; Unique Identifier: NCT01492361
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101114662023-04-19 Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT Olshansky, Brian Bhatt, Deepak L. Miller, Michael Steg, Ph. Gabriel Brinton, Eliot A. Jacobson, Terry A. Ketchum, Steven B. Doyle, Ralph T. Juliano, Rebecca A. Jiao, Lixia Kowey, Peter R. Reiffel, James A. Tardif, Jean‐Claude Ballantyne, Christie M. Chung, Mina K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with increased atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) hospitalization (3.1% IPE versus 2.1% placebo; P=0.004). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed post hoc efficacy and safety analyses of patients with or without prior AF (before randomization) and with or without in‐study time‐varying AF hospitalization to assess relationships of IPE (versus placebo) and outcomes. In‐study AF hospitalization event rates were higher in patients with prior AF (12.5% versus 6.3%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.007) versus without prior AF (2.2% versus 1.6%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.09). Serious bleeding rates trended higher in patients with (7.3% versus 6.0%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.59) versus without prior AF (2.3% versus 1.7%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.08). With IPE, serious bleeding trended higher regardless of prior AF (interaction P value [P (int)]=0.61) or postrandomization AF hospitalization (P (int)=0.66). Patients with prior AF (n=751, 9.2%) versus without prior AF (n=7428, 90.8%) had similar relative risk reductions of the primary composite and key secondary composite end points with IPE versus placebo (P (int)=0.37 and P (int)=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In REDUCE‐IT, in‐study AF hospitalization rates were higher in patients with prior AF especially in those randomized to IPE. Although serious bleeding trended higher in those randomized to IPE versus placebo over the course of the study, serious bleeding was not different regardless of prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization. Patients with prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization had consistent relative risk reductions across primary, key secondary, and stroke end points with IPE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01492361; Unique Identifier: NCT01492361 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10111466/ /pubmed/36802845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Olshansky, Brian
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Miller, Michael
Steg, Ph. Gabriel
Brinton, Eliot A.
Jacobson, Terry A.
Ketchum, Steven B.
Doyle, Ralph T.
Juliano, Rebecca A.
Jiao, Lixia
Kowey, Peter R.
Reiffel, James A.
Tardif, Jean‐Claude
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Chung, Mina K.
Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title_full Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title_fullStr Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title_short Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
title_sort cardiovascular benefits of icosapent ethyl in patients with and without atrial fibrillation in reduce‐it
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756
work_keys_str_mv AT olshanskybrian cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT bhattdeepakl cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT millermichael cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT stegphgabriel cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT brintoneliota cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT jacobsonterrya cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT ketchumstevenb cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT doyleralpht cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT julianorebeccaa cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT jiaolixia cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT koweypeterr cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT reiffeljamesa cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT tardifjeanclaude cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT ballantynechristiem cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT chungminak cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit
AT cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit