Cargando…
Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756 |
_version_ | 1785027459848077312 |
---|---|
author | Olshansky, Brian Bhatt, Deepak L. Miller, Michael Steg, Ph. Gabriel Brinton, Eliot A. Jacobson, Terry A. Ketchum, Steven B. Doyle, Ralph T. Juliano, Rebecca A. Jiao, Lixia Kowey, Peter R. Reiffel, James A. Tardif, Jean‐Claude Ballantyne, Christie M. Chung, Mina K. |
author_facet | Olshansky, Brian Bhatt, Deepak L. Miller, Michael Steg, Ph. Gabriel Brinton, Eliot A. Jacobson, Terry A. Ketchum, Steven B. Doyle, Ralph T. Juliano, Rebecca A. Jiao, Lixia Kowey, Peter R. Reiffel, James A. Tardif, Jean‐Claude Ballantyne, Christie M. Chung, Mina K. |
author_sort | Olshansky, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with increased atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) hospitalization (3.1% IPE versus 2.1% placebo; P=0.004). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed post hoc efficacy and safety analyses of patients with or without prior AF (before randomization) and with or without in‐study time‐varying AF hospitalization to assess relationships of IPE (versus placebo) and outcomes. In‐study AF hospitalization event rates were higher in patients with prior AF (12.5% versus 6.3%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.007) versus without prior AF (2.2% versus 1.6%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.09). Serious bleeding rates trended higher in patients with (7.3% versus 6.0%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.59) versus without prior AF (2.3% versus 1.7%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.08). With IPE, serious bleeding trended higher regardless of prior AF (interaction P value [P (int)]=0.61) or postrandomization AF hospitalization (P (int)=0.66). Patients with prior AF (n=751, 9.2%) versus without prior AF (n=7428, 90.8%) had similar relative risk reductions of the primary composite and key secondary composite end points with IPE versus placebo (P (int)=0.37 and P (int)=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In REDUCE‐IT, in‐study AF hospitalization rates were higher in patients with prior AF especially in those randomized to IPE. Although serious bleeding trended higher in those randomized to IPE versus placebo over the course of the study, serious bleeding was not different regardless of prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization. Patients with prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization had consistent relative risk reductions across primary, key secondary, and stroke end points with IPE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01492361; Unique Identifier: NCT01492361 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10111466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101114662023-04-19 Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT Olshansky, Brian Bhatt, Deepak L. Miller, Michael Steg, Ph. Gabriel Brinton, Eliot A. Jacobson, Terry A. Ketchum, Steven B. Doyle, Ralph T. Juliano, Rebecca A. Jiao, Lixia Kowey, Peter R. Reiffel, James A. Tardif, Jean‐Claude Ballantyne, Christie M. Chung, Mina K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), icosapent ethyl (IPE) versus placebo) reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, but was associated with increased atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) hospitalization (3.1% IPE versus 2.1% placebo; P=0.004). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed post hoc efficacy and safety analyses of patients with or without prior AF (before randomization) and with or without in‐study time‐varying AF hospitalization to assess relationships of IPE (versus placebo) and outcomes. In‐study AF hospitalization event rates were higher in patients with prior AF (12.5% versus 6.3%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.007) versus without prior AF (2.2% versus 1.6%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.09). Serious bleeding rates trended higher in patients with (7.3% versus 6.0%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.59) versus without prior AF (2.3% versus 1.7%, IPE versus placebo; P=0.08). With IPE, serious bleeding trended higher regardless of prior AF (interaction P value [P (int)]=0.61) or postrandomization AF hospitalization (P (int)=0.66). Patients with prior AF (n=751, 9.2%) versus without prior AF (n=7428, 90.8%) had similar relative risk reductions of the primary composite and key secondary composite end points with IPE versus placebo (P (int)=0.37 and P (int)=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In REDUCE‐IT, in‐study AF hospitalization rates were higher in patients with prior AF especially in those randomized to IPE. Although serious bleeding trended higher in those randomized to IPE versus placebo over the course of the study, serious bleeding was not different regardless of prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization. Patients with prior AF or in‐study AF hospitalization had consistent relative risk reductions across primary, key secondary, and stroke end points with IPE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01492361; Unique Identifier: NCT01492361 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10111466/ /pubmed/36802845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Olshansky, Brian Bhatt, Deepak L. Miller, Michael Steg, Ph. Gabriel Brinton, Eliot A. Jacobson, Terry A. Ketchum, Steven B. Doyle, Ralph T. Juliano, Rebecca A. Jiao, Lixia Kowey, Peter R. Reiffel, James A. Tardif, Jean‐Claude Ballantyne, Christie M. Chung, Mina K. Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT |
title | Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
|
title_full | Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
|
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
|
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
|
title_short | Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE‐IT
|
title_sort | cardiovascular benefits of icosapent ethyl in patients with and without atrial fibrillation in reduce‐it |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.026756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olshanskybrian cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT bhattdeepakl cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT millermichael cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT stegphgabriel cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT brintoneliota cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT jacobsonterrya cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT ketchumstevenb cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT doyleralpht cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT julianorebeccaa cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT jiaolixia cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT koweypeterr cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT reiffeljamesa cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT tardifjeanclaude cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT ballantynechristiem cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT chungminak cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit AT cardiovascularbenefitsoficosapentethylinpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationinreduceit |