Cargando…

Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II

BACKGROUND: Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants require dose adjustment based on kidney function.The most common estimate of kidney function employed in clinical practice is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); however, product monographs recommend the use of the Cockcroft‐Gault estimated creat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Ren Jie Robert, Holmes, DaJuanicia N., Andrade, Jason G., Levin, Adeera, Piccini, Jonathan P., Fordyce, Christopher B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36892077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026605
_version_ 1785027474362466304
author Yao, Ren Jie Robert
Holmes, DaJuanicia N.
Andrade, Jason G.
Levin, Adeera
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
author_facet Yao, Ren Jie Robert
Holmes, DaJuanicia N.
Andrade, Jason G.
Levin, Adeera
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
author_sort Yao, Ren Jie Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants require dose adjustment based on kidney function.The most common estimate of kidney function employed in clinical practice is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); however, product monographs recommend the use of the Cockcroft‐Gault estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) for dose adjustment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors included patients enrolled in the ORBIT‐AF II (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation AF II) trial. Dosing was considered inappropriate when use of eGFR resulted in a lower (undertreatment) or higher (overtreatment) dose than that recommended by the eCrCl. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke or systemic embolism, new‐onset heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Among 8727 in the overall cohort, agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was observed in 93.5% to 93.8% of patients. Among 2184 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was 79.9% to 80.7%. Dosing misclassification was more frequent in the CKD population (41.9% of rivaroxaban users, 5.7% of dabigatran users, and 4.6% apixaban users). At 1 year, undertreated patients in the CKD group had significantly greater major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.08–7.92]) compared with the group with appropriate nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of misclassification of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing was high when using eGFR, particularly among patients with CKD. Among patients with CKD, potential undertreatment due to inappropriate and off‐label renal formulae may result in worse clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of using eCrCl, and not eGFR, for dose adjustment in all patients with AF receiving nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101115272023-04-19 Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II Yao, Ren Jie Robert Holmes, DaJuanicia N. Andrade, Jason G. Levin, Adeera Piccini, Jonathan P. Fordyce, Christopher B. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants require dose adjustment based on kidney function.The most common estimate of kidney function employed in clinical practice is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); however, product monographs recommend the use of the Cockcroft‐Gault estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) for dose adjustment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors included patients enrolled in the ORBIT‐AF II (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation AF II) trial. Dosing was considered inappropriate when use of eGFR resulted in a lower (undertreatment) or higher (overtreatment) dose than that recommended by the eCrCl. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke or systemic embolism, new‐onset heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Among 8727 in the overall cohort, agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was observed in 93.5% to 93.8% of patients. Among 2184 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was 79.9% to 80.7%. Dosing misclassification was more frequent in the CKD population (41.9% of rivaroxaban users, 5.7% of dabigatran users, and 4.6% apixaban users). At 1 year, undertreated patients in the CKD group had significantly greater major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.08–7.92]) compared with the group with appropriate nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of misclassification of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing was high when using eGFR, particularly among patients with CKD. Among patients with CKD, potential undertreatment due to inappropriate and off‐label renal formulae may result in worse clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of using eCrCl, and not eGFR, for dose adjustment in all patients with AF receiving nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10111527/ /pubmed/36892077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026605 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yao, Ren Jie Robert
Holmes, DaJuanicia N.
Andrade, Jason G.
Levin, Adeera
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title_full Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title_fullStr Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title_short Variability in Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Dose Eligibility and Adjustment According to Renal Formulae and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From ORBIT‐AF II
title_sort variability in nonvitamin k oral anticoagulant dose eligibility and adjustment according to renal formulae and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without chronic kidney disease: insights from orbit‐af ii
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36892077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026605
work_keys_str_mv AT yaorenjierobert variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii
AT holmesdajuanician variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii
AT andradejasong variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii
AT levinadeera variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii
AT piccinijonathanp variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii
AT fordycechristopherb variabilityinnonvitaminkoralanticoagulantdoseeligibilityandadjustmentaccordingtorenalformulaeandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithandwithoutchronickidneydiseaseinsightsfromorbitafii