Cargando…

Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Data on the routine use of video-assisted laryngoscopy in peri-operative intubations are rather inconsistent and ambiguous, in part due to small populations and non-uniform outcome measures in past trials. Failed or prolonged intubation procedures are a reason for relevant morbidity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmid, Benedikt, Eckert, Dominik, Meixner, Andreas, Pistner, Paul, Malzahn, Uwe, Berberich, Monika, Happel, Oliver, Meybohm, Patrick, Kranke, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02083-3
_version_ 1785027505477910528
author Schmid, Benedikt
Eckert, Dominik
Meixner, Andreas
Pistner, Paul
Malzahn, Uwe
Berberich, Monika
Happel, Oliver
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
author_facet Schmid, Benedikt
Eckert, Dominik
Meixner, Andreas
Pistner, Paul
Malzahn, Uwe
Berberich, Monika
Happel, Oliver
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
author_sort Schmid, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data on the routine use of video-assisted laryngoscopy in peri-operative intubations are rather inconsistent and ambiguous, in part due to small populations and non-uniform outcome measures in past trials. Failed or prolonged intubation procedures are a reason for relevant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine whether video-assisted laryngoscopy (with both Macintosh-shaped and hyperangulated blades) is at least equal to the standard method of direct laryngoscopy with respect to the first-pass success rate. Furthermore, validated tools from the field of human factors will be applied to examine within-team communication and task load during this critical medical procedure. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, three-armed parallel group design, multi-centre trial, a total of more than 2500 adult patients scheduled for perioperative endotracheal intubation will be randomized. In equally large arms, video-assisted laryngoscopy with a Macintosh-shaped or a hyperangulated blade will be compared to the standard of care (direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade). In a pre-defined hierarchical analysis, we will test the primary outcome for non-inferiority first. If this goal should be met, the design and projected statistical power also allow for subsequent testing for superiority of one of the interventions. Various secondary outcomes will account for patient safety considerations as well as human factors interactions within the provider team and will allow for further exploratory data analysis and hypothesis generation. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial will provide a solid base of data in a field where reliable evidence is of major clinical importance. With thousands of endotracheal intubations performed every day in operating rooms around the world, every bit of performance improvement translates into increased patient safety and comfort and may eventually prevent significant burden of disease. Therefore, we feel confident that a large trial has the potential to considerably benefit patients and anaesthetists alike. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov NCT05228288. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1.1, November 15, 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101117202023-04-19 Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial Schmid, Benedikt Eckert, Dominik Meixner, Andreas Pistner, Paul Malzahn, Uwe Berberich, Monika Happel, Oliver Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter BMC Anesthesiol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Data on the routine use of video-assisted laryngoscopy in peri-operative intubations are rather inconsistent and ambiguous, in part due to small populations and non-uniform outcome measures in past trials. Failed or prolonged intubation procedures are a reason for relevant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine whether video-assisted laryngoscopy (with both Macintosh-shaped and hyperangulated blades) is at least equal to the standard method of direct laryngoscopy with respect to the first-pass success rate. Furthermore, validated tools from the field of human factors will be applied to examine within-team communication and task load during this critical medical procedure. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, three-armed parallel group design, multi-centre trial, a total of more than 2500 adult patients scheduled for perioperative endotracheal intubation will be randomized. In equally large arms, video-assisted laryngoscopy with a Macintosh-shaped or a hyperangulated blade will be compared to the standard of care (direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade). In a pre-defined hierarchical analysis, we will test the primary outcome for non-inferiority first. If this goal should be met, the design and projected statistical power also allow for subsequent testing for superiority of one of the interventions. Various secondary outcomes will account for patient safety considerations as well as human factors interactions within the provider team and will allow for further exploratory data analysis and hypothesis generation. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial will provide a solid base of data in a field where reliable evidence is of major clinical importance. With thousands of endotracheal intubations performed every day in operating rooms around the world, every bit of performance improvement translates into increased patient safety and comfort and may eventually prevent significant burden of disease. Therefore, we feel confident that a large trial has the potential to considerably benefit patients and anaesthetists alike. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov NCT05228288. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1.1, November 15, 2021. BioMed Central 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10111720/ /pubmed/37072702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02083-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schmid, Benedikt
Eckert, Dominik
Meixner, Andreas
Pistner, Paul
Malzahn, Uwe
Berberich, Monika
Happel, Oliver
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title_full Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title_fullStr Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title_full_unstemmed Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title_short Conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (COVALENT) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
title_sort conventional versus video-assisted laryngoscopy for perioperative endotracheal intubation (covalent) - a randomized, controlled multicenter trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02083-3
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidbenedikt conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT eckertdominik conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT meixnerandreas conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT pistnerpaul conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT malzahnuwe conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT berberichmonika conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT happeloliver conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT meybohmpatrick conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT krankepeter conventionalversusvideoassistedlaryngoscopyforperioperativeendotrachealintubationcovalentarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial