Cargando…
Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Over 50% of annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be averted through access to high-quality emergency care. OBJECTIVES: We performed a scoping review of the literature that described at least one measure of emergency care access in LMICs in order to unders...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067884 |
_version_ | 1785027538726158336 |
---|---|
author | Hirner, Sarah Dhakal, Jyotshila Broccoli, Morgan Carol Ross, Madeline Calvello Hynes, Emilie J Bills, Corey B |
author_facet | Hirner, Sarah Dhakal, Jyotshila Broccoli, Morgan Carol Ross, Madeline Calvello Hynes, Emilie J Bills, Corey B |
author_sort | Hirner, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over 50% of annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be averted through access to high-quality emergency care. OBJECTIVES: We performed a scoping review of the literature that described at least one measure of emergency care access in LMICs in order to understand relevant barriers to emergency care systems. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language studies published between 1 January 1990 and 30 December 2020, with one or more discrete measure(s) of access to emergency health services in LMICs described. SOURCE OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the grey literature. CHARTING METHODS: A structured data extraction tool was used to identify and classify the number of ‘unique’ measures, and the number of times each unique measure was studied in the literature (‘total’ measures). Measures of access were categorised by access type, defined by Thomas and Penchansky, with further categorisation according to the ‘Three Delay’ model of seeking, reaching and receiving care, and the WHO’s Emergency Care Systems Framework (ECSF). RESULTS: A total of 3103 articles were screened. 75 met full study inclusion. Articles were uniformly descriptive (n=75, 100%). 137 discrete measures of access were reported. Unique measures of accommodation (n=42, 30.7%) and availability (n=40, 29.2%) were most common. Measures of seeking, reaching and receiving care were 22 (16.0%), 46 (33.6%) and 69 (50.4%), respectively. According to the ECSF slightly more measures focused on prehospital care—inclusive of care at the scene and through transport to a facility (n=76, 55.4%) as compared with facility-based care (n=57, 41.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Numerous measures of emergency care access are described in the literature, but many measures are overaddressed. Development of a core set of access measures with associated minimum standards are necessary to aid in ensuring universal access to high-quality emergency care in all settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10111883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101118832023-04-19 Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review Hirner, Sarah Dhakal, Jyotshila Broccoli, Morgan Carol Ross, Madeline Calvello Hynes, Emilie J Bills, Corey B BMJ Open Emergency Medicine BACKGROUND: Over 50% of annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be averted through access to high-quality emergency care. OBJECTIVES: We performed a scoping review of the literature that described at least one measure of emergency care access in LMICs in order to understand relevant barriers to emergency care systems. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language studies published between 1 January 1990 and 30 December 2020, with one or more discrete measure(s) of access to emergency health services in LMICs described. SOURCE OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the grey literature. CHARTING METHODS: A structured data extraction tool was used to identify and classify the number of ‘unique’ measures, and the number of times each unique measure was studied in the literature (‘total’ measures). Measures of access were categorised by access type, defined by Thomas and Penchansky, with further categorisation according to the ‘Three Delay’ model of seeking, reaching and receiving care, and the WHO’s Emergency Care Systems Framework (ECSF). RESULTS: A total of 3103 articles were screened. 75 met full study inclusion. Articles were uniformly descriptive (n=75, 100%). 137 discrete measures of access were reported. Unique measures of accommodation (n=42, 30.7%) and availability (n=40, 29.2%) were most common. Measures of seeking, reaching and receiving care were 22 (16.0%), 46 (33.6%) and 69 (50.4%), respectively. According to the ECSF slightly more measures focused on prehospital care—inclusive of care at the scene and through transport to a facility (n=76, 55.4%) as compared with facility-based care (n=57, 41.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Numerous measures of emergency care access are described in the literature, but many measures are overaddressed. Development of a core set of access measures with associated minimum standards are necessary to aid in ensuring universal access to high-quality emergency care in all settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10111883/ /pubmed/37068910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067884 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Hirner, Sarah Dhakal, Jyotshila Broccoli, Morgan Carol Ross, Madeline Calvello Hynes, Emilie J Bills, Corey B Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title | Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_full | Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_short | Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
title_sort | defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirnersarah definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT dhakaljyotshila definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT broccolimorgancarol definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT rossmadeline definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT calvellohynesemiliej definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview AT billscoreyb definingmeasuresofemergencycareaccessinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreview |