Cargando…

Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Millions of patients receive general anaesthesia for surgery annually. Crucial gaps in evidence exist regarding which technique, propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or inhaled volatile anaesthesia (INVA), yields superior patient experience, safety and outcomes. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tellor Pennington, Bethany R, Colquhoun, Douglas A, Neuman, Mark D, Politi, Mary C, Janda, Allison M, Spino, Cathie, Thelen-Perry, Steven, Wu, Zhenke, Kumar, Sathish S, Gregory, Stephen H, Avidan, Michael S, Kheterpal, Sachin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070096
_version_ 1785027547234304000
author Tellor Pennington, Bethany R
Colquhoun, Douglas A
Neuman, Mark D
Politi, Mary C
Janda, Allison M
Spino, Cathie
Thelen-Perry, Steven
Wu, Zhenke
Kumar, Sathish S
Gregory, Stephen H
Avidan, Michael S
Kheterpal, Sachin
author_facet Tellor Pennington, Bethany R
Colquhoun, Douglas A
Neuman, Mark D
Politi, Mary C
Janda, Allison M
Spino, Cathie
Thelen-Perry, Steven
Wu, Zhenke
Kumar, Sathish S
Gregory, Stephen H
Avidan, Michael S
Kheterpal, Sachin
author_sort Tellor Pennington, Bethany R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Millions of patients receive general anaesthesia for surgery annually. Crucial gaps in evidence exist regarding which technique, propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or inhaled volatile anaesthesia (INVA), yields superior patient experience, safety and outcomes. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a large comparative effectiveness trial assessing patient experiences and outcomes after receiving propofol TIVA or INVA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was cocreated by a diverse team, including patient partners with personal experience of TIVA or INVA. The design is a 300-patient, two-centre, randomised, feasibility pilot trial. Patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia with a tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway will be eligible. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to propofol TIVA or INVA, stratified by centre and procedural complexity. The feasibility endpoints include: (1) proportion of patients approached who agree to participate; (2) proportion of patients who receive their assigned randomised treatment; (3) completeness of outcomes data collection and (4) feasibility of data management procedures. Proportions and 95% CIs will be calculated to assess whether prespecified thresholds are met for the feasibility parameters. If the lower bounds of the 95% CI are above the thresholds of 10% for the proportion of patients agreeing to participate among those approached and 80% for compliance with treatment allocation for each randomised treatment group, this will suggest that our planned pragmatic 12 500-patient comparative effectiveness trial can likely be conducted successfully. Other feasibility outcomes and adverse events will be described. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics board at Washington University (IRB# 202205053), serving as the single Institutional Review Board for both participating sites. Recruitment began in September 2022. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, internet-based educational materials and mass media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05346588.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10111921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101119212023-04-19 Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial Tellor Pennington, Bethany R Colquhoun, Douglas A Neuman, Mark D Politi, Mary C Janda, Allison M Spino, Cathie Thelen-Perry, Steven Wu, Zhenke Kumar, Sathish S Gregory, Stephen H Avidan, Michael S Kheterpal, Sachin BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Millions of patients receive general anaesthesia for surgery annually. Crucial gaps in evidence exist regarding which technique, propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or inhaled volatile anaesthesia (INVA), yields superior patient experience, safety and outcomes. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a large comparative effectiveness trial assessing patient experiences and outcomes after receiving propofol TIVA or INVA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was cocreated by a diverse team, including patient partners with personal experience of TIVA or INVA. The design is a 300-patient, two-centre, randomised, feasibility pilot trial. Patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia with a tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway will be eligible. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to propofol TIVA or INVA, stratified by centre and procedural complexity. The feasibility endpoints include: (1) proportion of patients approached who agree to participate; (2) proportion of patients who receive their assigned randomised treatment; (3) completeness of outcomes data collection and (4) feasibility of data management procedures. Proportions and 95% CIs will be calculated to assess whether prespecified thresholds are met for the feasibility parameters. If the lower bounds of the 95% CI are above the thresholds of 10% for the proportion of patients agreeing to participate among those approached and 80% for compliance with treatment allocation for each randomised treatment group, this will suggest that our planned pragmatic 12 500-patient comparative effectiveness trial can likely be conducted successfully. Other feasibility outcomes and adverse events will be described. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics board at Washington University (IRB# 202205053), serving as the single Institutional Review Board for both participating sites. Recruitment began in September 2022. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, internet-based educational materials and mass media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05346588. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10111921/ /pubmed/37068889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070096 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Tellor Pennington, Bethany R
Colquhoun, Douglas A
Neuman, Mark D
Politi, Mary C
Janda, Allison M
Spino, Cathie
Thelen-Perry, Steven
Wu, Zhenke
Kumar, Sathish S
Gregory, Stephen H
Avidan, Michael S
Kheterpal, Sachin
Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_short Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_sort feasibility pilot trial for the trajectories of recovery after intravenous propofol versus inhaled volatile anesthesia (thrive) pragmatic randomised controlled trial
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070096
work_keys_str_mv AT tellorpenningtonbethanyr feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT colquhoundouglasa feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT neumanmarkd feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT politimaryc feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jandaallisonm feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT spinocathie feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thelenperrysteven feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wuzhenke feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kumarsathishs feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gregorystephenh feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT avidanmichaels feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kheterpalsachin feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT feasibilitypilottrialforthetrajectoriesofrecoveryafterintravenouspropofolversusinhaledvolatileanesthesiathrivepragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial