Cargando…

PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPINAL SURGERY VERSUS PHYSICAL CAPACITY

OBJECTIVES: Assess whether the spine surgical approach for degenerative diseases can influence the physical capacity of patients and its correlation with cardiorespiratory function. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 9 patients of both genders, aged between eighteen and sixty, scheduled f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Vam Charly Pereira Araújo, Felix, Hector Figueiredo, Navarro, Fernanda Andrea Minutti, Salles, Ana Fatima, de Oliveira, Carolinne Nascimento, Rodrigues, Luiz Claudio Lacerda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e259011
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Assess whether the spine surgical approach for degenerative diseases can influence the physical capacity of patients and its correlation with cardiorespiratory function. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 9 patients of both genders, aged between eighteen and sixty, scheduled for spinal surgery for degenerative disease in the lumbar segment. Patients underwent treadmill stress test two times, fifteen days before and sixty days after the surgery. A cardiologist performed the test according to the Bruce protocol with a progressive increase in incline and speed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between pre- and postoperative assessments for the parameters evaluated in the treadmill stress test. Forty-four percent of patients needed to interrupt the test postoperatively due to dyspnea (p=0.023). CONCLUSION: The improvement obtained with spinal surgery does not have statistically significant relevance in tiredness, pain, and fatigue in the lower limbs and low back pain. Some patients could not complete the examination after surgery due to poor physical conditioning, and it was necessary to interrupt the examination due to dyspnea. Level of Evidence II; Lesser quality RCT (eg, < 80% followup, no blinding, or improper randomization).