Cargando…

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dursun, Muhsin, Altun, Guray, Ozsahin, Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916
_version_ 1785027609588924416
author Dursun, Muhsin
Altun, Guray
Ozsahin, Murat
author_facet Dursun, Muhsin
Altun, Guray
Ozsahin, Murat
author_sort Dursun, Muhsin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction. RESULTS: CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC(1)), early postoperative (CC(2)), and late postoperative (CC(3)). The distance variance between CC(2) and CC(3) was referred as ΔCC (CC(3) - CC(2)). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10112356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101123562023-04-19 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON Dursun, Muhsin Altun, Guray Ozsahin, Murat Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction. RESULTS: CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC(1)), early postoperative (CC(2)), and late postoperative (CC(3)). The distance variance between CC(2) and CC(3) was referred as ΔCC (CC(3) - CC(2)). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series. ATHA EDITORA 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10112356/ /pubmed/37082163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dursun, Muhsin
Altun, Guray
Ozsahin, Murat
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title_full SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title_fullStr SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title_full_unstemmed SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title_short SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
title_sort surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: hook plate versus suture button
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916
work_keys_str_mv AT dursunmuhsin surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton
AT altunguray surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton
AT ozsahinmurat surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton