Cargando…
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916 |
_version_ | 1785027609588924416 |
---|---|
author | Dursun, Muhsin Altun, Guray Ozsahin, Murat |
author_facet | Dursun, Muhsin Altun, Guray Ozsahin, Murat |
author_sort | Dursun, Muhsin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction. RESULTS: CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC(1)), early postoperative (CC(2)), and late postoperative (CC(3)). The distance variance between CC(2) and CC(3) was referred as ΔCC (CC(3) - CC(2)). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10112356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101123562023-04-19 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON Dursun, Muhsin Altun, Guray Ozsahin, Murat Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction. RESULTS: CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC(1)), early postoperative (CC(2)), and late postoperative (CC(3)). The distance variance between CC(2) and CC(3) was referred as ΔCC (CC(3) - CC(2)). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series. ATHA EDITORA 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10112356/ /pubmed/37082163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dursun, Muhsin Altun, Guray Ozsahin, Murat SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title | SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title_full | SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title_fullStr | SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title_full_unstemmed | SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title_short | SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON |
title_sort | surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: hook plate versus suture button |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dursunmuhsin surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton AT altunguray surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton AT ozsahinmurat surgicaltreatmentofacromioclaviculardislocationhookplateversussuturebutton |