Cargando…

Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary

BACKGROUND: Implantable medical devices (IMDs) are medical instruments embedded inside the body. Well-informed and empowered patients living with IMDs are key players of improving IMD-related patient safety and health outcomes. However, little is known about IMD patients’ epidemiology, characteristi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hölgyesi, Áron, Tóth, Barbara, Kozlovszky, Miklós, Kuti, József, Weszl, Miklós, Balázs, György, Baji, Petra, Kovács, Levente, Gulácsi, László, Zrubka, Zsombor, Péntek, Márta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284577
_version_ 1785027695689596928
author Hölgyesi, Áron
Tóth, Barbara
Kozlovszky, Miklós
Kuti, József
Weszl, Miklós
Balázs, György
Baji, Petra
Kovács, Levente
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
Péntek, Márta
author_facet Hölgyesi, Áron
Tóth, Barbara
Kozlovszky, Miklós
Kuti, József
Weszl, Miklós
Balázs, György
Baji, Petra
Kovács, Levente
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
Péntek, Márta
author_sort Hölgyesi, Áron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implantable medical devices (IMDs) are medical instruments embedded inside the body. Well-informed and empowered patients living with IMDs are key players of improving IMD-related patient safety and health outcomes. However, little is known about IMD patients’ epidemiology, characteristics, and current awareness levels. Our primary aim was to investigate the point and lifetime prevalence of patients living with IMDs. Patients’ IMD-related knowledge and determinants of IMDs’ impact on their life were also explored. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted. Respondents’ IMD history, whether they received instructions for use and IMD’s overall impact on life were recorded by self-reports. Patients’ knowledge about living with IMDs was assessed on visual analogue scales (VAS, 0–10). Shared decision-making was analyzed by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons between IMD wearers were performed for statistical differences. Significant determinants of IMD’s overall impact on life were examined in linear regression analysis. RESULTS: In the total sample (N = 1400, mean age 58.1 ±11.1; female 53.7%), nearly one third of respondents were living with IMD (30.9%; 433/1400). Among them, the most frequent IMDs were tooth implants (30.9%) and intraocular lens (26.8%). Mean knowledge VAS scores were similar (range: 5.5 ±3.8–6.5 ±3.2) but differences by IMD types were observed. Patients who received instructions for use or reported better impact on life indicated higher self-reported knowledge. Regression confirmed that patients’ knowledge was significant predictor of IMD’s impact on life, but this effect was overwritten by the SDM-Q-9. CONCLUSIONS: This first comprehensive epidemiological study on IMDs provides basic data for public health strategy planning alongside the implementation of MDR. Improved self-perceived outcomes were associated with higher knowledge hence education of patients receiving IMD deserves consideration. We suggest to investigate further the role of shared decision-making on IMD’s overall impact on patients’ life in future prospective studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10112797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101127972023-04-19 Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary Hölgyesi, Áron Tóth, Barbara Kozlovszky, Miklós Kuti, József Weszl, Miklós Balázs, György Baji, Petra Kovács, Levente Gulácsi, László Zrubka, Zsombor Péntek, Márta PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Implantable medical devices (IMDs) are medical instruments embedded inside the body. Well-informed and empowered patients living with IMDs are key players of improving IMD-related patient safety and health outcomes. However, little is known about IMD patients’ epidemiology, characteristics, and current awareness levels. Our primary aim was to investigate the point and lifetime prevalence of patients living with IMDs. Patients’ IMD-related knowledge and determinants of IMDs’ impact on their life were also explored. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted. Respondents’ IMD history, whether they received instructions for use and IMD’s overall impact on life were recorded by self-reports. Patients’ knowledge about living with IMDs was assessed on visual analogue scales (VAS, 0–10). Shared decision-making was analyzed by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons between IMD wearers were performed for statistical differences. Significant determinants of IMD’s overall impact on life were examined in linear regression analysis. RESULTS: In the total sample (N = 1400, mean age 58.1 ±11.1; female 53.7%), nearly one third of respondents were living with IMD (30.9%; 433/1400). Among them, the most frequent IMDs were tooth implants (30.9%) and intraocular lens (26.8%). Mean knowledge VAS scores were similar (range: 5.5 ±3.8–6.5 ±3.2) but differences by IMD types were observed. Patients who received instructions for use or reported better impact on life indicated higher self-reported knowledge. Regression confirmed that patients’ knowledge was significant predictor of IMD’s impact on life, but this effect was overwritten by the SDM-Q-9. CONCLUSIONS: This first comprehensive epidemiological study on IMDs provides basic data for public health strategy planning alongside the implementation of MDR. Improved self-perceived outcomes were associated with higher knowledge hence education of patients receiving IMD deserves consideration. We suggest to investigate further the role of shared decision-making on IMD’s overall impact on patients’ life in future prospective studies. Public Library of Science 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10112797/ /pubmed/37071626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284577 Text en © 2023 Hölgyesi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hölgyesi, Áron
Tóth, Barbara
Kozlovszky, Miklós
Kuti, József
Weszl, Miklós
Balázs, György
Baji, Petra
Kovács, Levente
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
Péntek, Márta
Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title_full Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title_fullStr Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title_short Epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: Results of a cross-sectional survey in Hungary
title_sort epidemiology and patients’ self-reported knowledge of implantable medical devices: results of a cross-sectional survey in hungary
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284577
work_keys_str_mv AT holgyesiaron epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT tothbarbara epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT kozlovszkymiklos epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT kutijozsef epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT weszlmiklos epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT balazsgyorgy epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT bajipetra epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT kovacslevente epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT gulacsilaszlo epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT zrubkazsombor epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary
AT pentekmarta epidemiologyandpatientsselfreportedknowledgeofimplantablemedicaldevicesresultsofacrosssectionalsurveyinhungary