Cargando…

Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection

DNA metabarcoding of pollen is a useful tool for studying bee foraging ecology. However, several questions about this method remain unresolved, including the extent to which sequence read data is quantitative, which type of sequence count removal threshold to use and how that choice affects our abil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arstingstall, Katherine A., DeBano, Sandra J., Li, Xiaoping, Wooster, David E., Rowland, Mary M., Burrows, Skyler, Frost, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282715
_version_ 1785027699751780352
author Arstingstall, Katherine A.
DeBano, Sandra J.
Li, Xiaoping
Wooster, David E.
Rowland, Mary M.
Burrows, Skyler
Frost, Kenneth
author_facet Arstingstall, Katherine A.
DeBano, Sandra J.
Li, Xiaoping
Wooster, David E.
Rowland, Mary M.
Burrows, Skyler
Frost, Kenneth
author_sort Arstingstall, Katherine A.
collection PubMed
description DNA metabarcoding of pollen is a useful tool for studying bee foraging ecology. However, several questions about this method remain unresolved, including the extent to which sequence read data is quantitative, which type of sequence count removal threshold to use and how that choice affects our ability to detect rare flower visits, and how sequence artefacts may confound conclusions about bee foraging behavior. To address these questions, we isolated pollen from five plant species and created treatments comprised of pollen from each species alone and combinations of pollen from multiple species that varied in richness and evenness. We used ITS2 and rbcL metabarcoding to identify plant species in the samples, compared the proportion of pollen by mass to the proportion of sequencing reads for each plant species in each treatment, and analyzed the sequencing data using both liberal and conservative thresholds. We collected pollen from foraging bees, analyzed metabarcoding data from those samples using each threshold, and compared the differences in the pollinator networks constructed from the data. Regardless of the threshold used, the relationship between the proportion of pollen by mass and sequencing reads was inconsistent, suggesting that the number of sequence reads is a poor proxy for pollen abundance in mixed-species samples. Using a liberal threshold resulted in greater detection of original plant species in mixtures but also detected additional species in mixtures and single-species samples. The conservative threshold reduced the number of additional plant species detected, but several species in mixtures were not detected above the threshold, resulting in false negatives. Pollinator networks produced using the two thresholds differed and illustrated tradeoffs between detection of rare species and estimation of network complexity. Threshold selection can have a major effect on conclusions drawn from studies using metabarcoding of bee pollen to study plant-pollinator interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10112814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101128142023-04-19 Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection Arstingstall, Katherine A. DeBano, Sandra J. Li, Xiaoping Wooster, David E. Rowland, Mary M. Burrows, Skyler Frost, Kenneth PLoS One Research Article DNA metabarcoding of pollen is a useful tool for studying bee foraging ecology. However, several questions about this method remain unresolved, including the extent to which sequence read data is quantitative, which type of sequence count removal threshold to use and how that choice affects our ability to detect rare flower visits, and how sequence artefacts may confound conclusions about bee foraging behavior. To address these questions, we isolated pollen from five plant species and created treatments comprised of pollen from each species alone and combinations of pollen from multiple species that varied in richness and evenness. We used ITS2 and rbcL metabarcoding to identify plant species in the samples, compared the proportion of pollen by mass to the proportion of sequencing reads for each plant species in each treatment, and analyzed the sequencing data using both liberal and conservative thresholds. We collected pollen from foraging bees, analyzed metabarcoding data from those samples using each threshold, and compared the differences in the pollinator networks constructed from the data. Regardless of the threshold used, the relationship between the proportion of pollen by mass and sequencing reads was inconsistent, suggesting that the number of sequence reads is a poor proxy for pollen abundance in mixed-species samples. Using a liberal threshold resulted in greater detection of original plant species in mixtures but also detected additional species in mixtures and single-species samples. The conservative threshold reduced the number of additional plant species detected, but several species in mixtures were not detected above the threshold, resulting in false negatives. Pollinator networks produced using the two thresholds differed and illustrated tradeoffs between detection of rare species and estimation of network complexity. Threshold selection can have a major effect on conclusions drawn from studies using metabarcoding of bee pollen to study plant-pollinator interactions. Public Library of Science 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10112814/ /pubmed/37071613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282715 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arstingstall, Katherine A.
DeBano, Sandra J.
Li, Xiaoping
Wooster, David E.
Rowland, Mary M.
Burrows, Skyler
Frost, Kenneth
Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title_full Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title_fullStr Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title_short Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
title_sort investigating the use of pollen dna metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282715
work_keys_str_mv AT arstingstallkatherinea investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT debanosandraj investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT lixiaoping investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT woosterdavide investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT rowlandmarym investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT burrowsskyler investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection
AT frostkenneth investigatingtheuseofpollendnametabarcodingtoquantifybeeforagingandeffectsofthresholdselection