Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To date, more than 761 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections have been recorded globally, and more than half of all children are estimated to be seropositive. Despite high SARS-CoV-2 infection incidences, the rate of severe COVID-19 in children is low. We aimed to assess the safety and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piechotta, Vanessa, Siemens, Waldemar, Thielemann, Iris, Toews, Markus, Koch, Judith, Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine, Kothari, Kavita, Grummich, Kathrin, Braun, Cordula, Kapp, Philipp, Labonté, Valérie, Wichmann, Ole, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Harder, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00078-0
_version_ 1785027707088666624
author Piechotta, Vanessa
Siemens, Waldemar
Thielemann, Iris
Toews, Markus
Koch, Judith
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Kothari, Kavita
Grummich, Kathrin
Braun, Cordula
Kapp, Philipp
Labonté, Valérie
Wichmann, Ole
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Harder, Thomas
author_facet Piechotta, Vanessa
Siemens, Waldemar
Thielemann, Iris
Toews, Markus
Koch, Judith
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Kothari, Kavita
Grummich, Kathrin
Braun, Cordula
Kapp, Philipp
Labonté, Valérie
Wichmann, Ole
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Harder, Thomas
author_sort Piechotta, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, more than 761 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections have been recorded globally, and more than half of all children are estimated to be seropositive. Despite high SARS-CoV-2 infection incidences, the rate of severe COVID-19 in children is low. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy or effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines approved in the EU for children aged 5–11 years. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included studies of any design identified through searching the COVID-19 L·OVE (living overview of evidence) platform up to Jan 23, 2023. We included studies with participants aged 5–11 years, with any COVID-19 vaccine approved by the European Medicines Agency—ie, mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), BNT162b2 Bivalent (against original strain and omicron [BA.4 or BA.5]), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), or mRNA-1273.214 (against original strain and omicron BA.1). Efficacy and effectiveness outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-confirmed or antigen-test confirmed), symptomatic COVID-19, hospital admission due to COVID-19, COVID-19-related mortality, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and long-term effects of COVID-19 (long COVID or post-COVID-19 condition as defined by study investigators or per WHO definition). Safety outcomes of interest were serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest (eg, myocarditis), solicited local and systemic events, and unsolicited adverse events. We assessed risk of bias and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022306822. FINDINGS: Of 5272 screened records, we included 51 (1·0%) studies (n=17 [33%] in quantitative synthesis). Vaccine effectiveness after two doses against omicron infections was 41·6% (95% CI 28·1–52·6; eight non-randomised studies of interventions [NRSIs]; CoE low), 36·2% (21·5–48·2; six NRSIs; CoE low) against symptomatic COVID-19, 75·3% (68·0–81·0; six NRSIs; CoE moderate) against COVID-19-related hospitalisations, and 78% (48–90, one NRSI; CoE very low) against MIS-C. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related mortality was not estimable. Crude event rates for deaths in unvaccinated children were less than one case per 100 000 children, and no events were reported for vaccinated children (four NRSIs; CoE low). No study on vaccine effectiveness against long-term effects was identified. Vaccine effectiveness after three doses was 55% (50–60; one NRSI; CoE moderate) against omicron infections, and 61% (55–67; one NRSI; CoE moderate) against symptomatic COVID-19. No study reported vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against hospitalisation following a third dose. Safety data suggested no increased risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·21–3·33]; two randomised controlled trials; CoE low), with approximately 0·23–1·2 events per 100 000 administered vaccines reported in real-life observations. Evidence on the risk of myocarditis was uncertain (RR 4·6 [0·1–156·1]; one NRSI; CoE low), with 0·13–1·04 observed events per 100 000 administered vaccines. The risk of solicited local reactions was 2·07 (1·80–2·39; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after one dose and 2·06 (1·70–2·49; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after two doses. The risk of solicited systemic reactions was 1·09 (1·04–1·16; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after one dose and 1·49 (1·34–1·65; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after two doses. The risk of unsolicited adverse events after two doses (RR 1·21 [1·07–1·38]; CoE moderate) was higher among mRNA-vaccinated compared with unvaccinated children. INTERPRETATION: In children aged 5–11 years, mRNA vaccines are moderately effective against infections with the omicron variant, but probably protect well against COVID-19 hospitalisations. Vaccines were reactogenic but probably safe. Findings of this systematic review can serve as a basis for public health policy and individual decision making on COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11 years. FUNDING: German Federal Joint Committee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10112865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101128652023-04-19 Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis Piechotta, Vanessa Siemens, Waldemar Thielemann, Iris Toews, Markus Koch, Judith Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Kothari, Kavita Grummich, Kathrin Braun, Cordula Kapp, Philipp Labonté, Valérie Wichmann, Ole Meerpohl, Joerg J Harder, Thomas Lancet Child Adolesc Health Articles BACKGROUND: To date, more than 761 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections have been recorded globally, and more than half of all children are estimated to be seropositive. Despite high SARS-CoV-2 infection incidences, the rate of severe COVID-19 in children is low. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy or effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines approved in the EU for children aged 5–11 years. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included studies of any design identified through searching the COVID-19 L·OVE (living overview of evidence) platform up to Jan 23, 2023. We included studies with participants aged 5–11 years, with any COVID-19 vaccine approved by the European Medicines Agency—ie, mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), BNT162b2 Bivalent (against original strain and omicron [BA.4 or BA.5]), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), or mRNA-1273.214 (against original strain and omicron BA.1). Efficacy and effectiveness outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-confirmed or antigen-test confirmed), symptomatic COVID-19, hospital admission due to COVID-19, COVID-19-related mortality, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and long-term effects of COVID-19 (long COVID or post-COVID-19 condition as defined by study investigators or per WHO definition). Safety outcomes of interest were serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest (eg, myocarditis), solicited local and systemic events, and unsolicited adverse events. We assessed risk of bias and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022306822. FINDINGS: Of 5272 screened records, we included 51 (1·0%) studies (n=17 [33%] in quantitative synthesis). Vaccine effectiveness after two doses against omicron infections was 41·6% (95% CI 28·1–52·6; eight non-randomised studies of interventions [NRSIs]; CoE low), 36·2% (21·5–48·2; six NRSIs; CoE low) against symptomatic COVID-19, 75·3% (68·0–81·0; six NRSIs; CoE moderate) against COVID-19-related hospitalisations, and 78% (48–90, one NRSI; CoE very low) against MIS-C. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related mortality was not estimable. Crude event rates for deaths in unvaccinated children were less than one case per 100 000 children, and no events were reported for vaccinated children (four NRSIs; CoE low). No study on vaccine effectiveness against long-term effects was identified. Vaccine effectiveness after three doses was 55% (50–60; one NRSI; CoE moderate) against omicron infections, and 61% (55–67; one NRSI; CoE moderate) against symptomatic COVID-19. No study reported vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against hospitalisation following a third dose. Safety data suggested no increased risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·21–3·33]; two randomised controlled trials; CoE low), with approximately 0·23–1·2 events per 100 000 administered vaccines reported in real-life observations. Evidence on the risk of myocarditis was uncertain (RR 4·6 [0·1–156·1]; one NRSI; CoE low), with 0·13–1·04 observed events per 100 000 administered vaccines. The risk of solicited local reactions was 2·07 (1·80–2·39; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after one dose and 2·06 (1·70–2·49; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after two doses. The risk of solicited systemic reactions was 1·09 (1·04–1·16; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after one dose and 1·49 (1·34–1·65; two RCTs; CoE moderate) after two doses. The risk of unsolicited adverse events after two doses (RR 1·21 [1·07–1·38]; CoE moderate) was higher among mRNA-vaccinated compared with unvaccinated children. INTERPRETATION: In children aged 5–11 years, mRNA vaccines are moderately effective against infections with the omicron variant, but probably protect well against COVID-19 hospitalisations. Vaccines were reactogenic but probably safe. Findings of this systematic review can serve as a basis for public health policy and individual decision making on COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11 years. FUNDING: German Federal Joint Committee. Elsevier Ltd. 2023-06 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10112865/ /pubmed/37084750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00078-0 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Articles
Piechotta, Vanessa
Siemens, Waldemar
Thielemann, Iris
Toews, Markus
Koch, Judith
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Kothari, Kavita
Grummich, Kathrin
Braun, Cordula
Kapp, Philipp
Labonté, Valérie
Wichmann, Ole
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Harder, Thomas
Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety and effectiveness of vaccines against covid-19 in children aged 5–11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00078-0
work_keys_str_mv AT piechottavanessa safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT siemenswaldemar safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thielemanniris safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT toewsmarkus safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kochjudith safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vygenbonnetsabine safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kotharikavita safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grummichkathrin safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brauncordula safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kappphilipp safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT labontevalerie safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wichmannole safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meerpohljoergj safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harderthomas safetyandeffectivenessofvaccinesagainstcovid19inchildrenaged511yearsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis