Cargando…

Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), including treatment costs, safety profile and effectiveness. METHODS: A literature review was performed of randomized-controlled trials, systematic reviews, Cochrane reports and Na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lata, Tahmina, Trautman, Jodie, Townend, Philip, Wilson, Robert B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goad008
_version_ 1785027725884391424
author Lata, Tahmina
Trautman, Jodie
Townend, Philip
Wilson, Robert B
author_facet Lata, Tahmina
Trautman, Jodie
Townend, Philip
Wilson, Robert B
author_sort Lata, Tahmina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), including treatment costs, safety profile and effectiveness. METHODS: A literature review was performed of randomized-controlled trials, systematic reviews, Cochrane reports and National/Societal guidelines of the medical, endoscopic and surgical management of GORD. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing patterns and expenditure were reviewed in different countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK and USA. RESULTS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are primarily indicated for control of GORD, Helicobacter pylori eradication (combined with antibiotics), preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal bleeding and treating peptic ulcer disease. There is widespread overprescribing of PPIs in Western and Eastern nations in terms of indication and duration, with substantial expense for national health providers. Despite a favourable short-term safety profile, there are observational associations of adverse effects with long-term PPIs. These include nutrient malabsorption, enteric infections and cardiovascular events. The prevalence of PPI use makes their long-term safety profile clinically relevant. Cost-benefit, symptom control and quality-of-life outcomes favour laparoscopic fundoplication rather than chronic PPI treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication in long-term management of PPI-responsive GORD is supported by SAGES, NICE and ACG, and PPI-refractory GORD by AGA and SAGES guidelines. The importance of establishing a definitive diagnosis prior to invasive management is emphasized, especially in PPI-refractory heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: We examined evidence-based guidelines for PPI prescribing and deprescribing in primary care and hospital settings and the need for PPI stewardship and education of health professionals. This narrative review presents the advantages and disadvantages of surgical, endoscopic and medical management of GORD, which may assist in shared decision making and treatment choice in individual patients. This paper was presented (GS020) at the 88th RACS Annual Scientific Conference, 6-10 May, 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10112961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101129612023-04-19 Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review Lata, Tahmina Trautman, Jodie Townend, Philip Wilson, Robert B Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Review Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), including treatment costs, safety profile and effectiveness. METHODS: A literature review was performed of randomized-controlled trials, systematic reviews, Cochrane reports and National/Societal guidelines of the medical, endoscopic and surgical management of GORD. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing patterns and expenditure were reviewed in different countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK and USA. RESULTS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are primarily indicated for control of GORD, Helicobacter pylori eradication (combined with antibiotics), preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal bleeding and treating peptic ulcer disease. There is widespread overprescribing of PPIs in Western and Eastern nations in terms of indication and duration, with substantial expense for national health providers. Despite a favourable short-term safety profile, there are observational associations of adverse effects with long-term PPIs. These include nutrient malabsorption, enteric infections and cardiovascular events. The prevalence of PPI use makes their long-term safety profile clinically relevant. Cost-benefit, symptom control and quality-of-life outcomes favour laparoscopic fundoplication rather than chronic PPI treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication in long-term management of PPI-responsive GORD is supported by SAGES, NICE and ACG, and PPI-refractory GORD by AGA and SAGES guidelines. The importance of establishing a definitive diagnosis prior to invasive management is emphasized, especially in PPI-refractory heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: We examined evidence-based guidelines for PPI prescribing and deprescribing in primary care and hospital settings and the need for PPI stewardship and education of health professionals. This narrative review presents the advantages and disadvantages of surgical, endoscopic and medical management of GORD, which may assist in shared decision making and treatment choice in individual patients. This paper was presented (GS020) at the 88th RACS Annual Scientific Conference, 6-10 May, 2019. Oxford University Press 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10112961/ /pubmed/37082451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goad008 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lata, Tahmina
Trautman, Jodie
Townend, Philip
Wilson, Robert B
Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title_full Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title_fullStr Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title_short Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
title_sort current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10112961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goad008
work_keys_str_mv AT latatahmina currentmanagementofgastrooesophagealrefluxdiseasetreatmentcostssafetyprofileandeffectivenessanarrativereview
AT trautmanjodie currentmanagementofgastrooesophagealrefluxdiseasetreatmentcostssafetyprofileandeffectivenessanarrativereview
AT townendphilip currentmanagementofgastrooesophagealrefluxdiseasetreatmentcostssafetyprofileandeffectivenessanarrativereview
AT wilsonrobertb currentmanagementofgastrooesophagealrefluxdiseasetreatmentcostssafetyprofileandeffectivenessanarrativereview