Cargando…

Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model

BACKGROUND: Previous prediction models for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cannot be applied to patients receiving transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and colpocleisis or those with preoperative subject urinary incontinence. This study aimed to develop and validate a new machine learning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Linru, Huang, Guanghua, Sun, Zhijing, Zhu, Lan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082678
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3648
_version_ 1785027746736373760
author Fu, Linru
Huang, Guanghua
Sun, Zhijing
Zhu, Lan
author_facet Fu, Linru
Huang, Guanghua
Sun, Zhijing
Zhu, Lan
author_sort Fu, Linru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous prediction models for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cannot be applied to patients receiving transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and colpocleisis or those with preoperative subject urinary incontinence. This study aimed to develop and validate a new machine learning model and compare it to previous models. METHODS: Female patients who underwent prolapse surgeries for stage 2–4 anterior or apical prolapse between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Prolapse surgeries included native tissue repair, LeFort/colpocleisis, sacrocolpopexy, and TVM surgery. The existing models to predict postoperative SUI were externally validated. Subsequently, the dataset was randomly divided into 2 sets in a 4:1 ratio. The larger group was used to construct and internally validate models of logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which were then externally validated. The discrimination of the prediction models was evaluated using the area under the curve, while the calibration of the models was measured using the Spiegelhalter z test, mean absolute error (MSE), and calibration curves. RESULTS: Overall, 555 patients were enrolled, and 116 experienced SUI 1 year postoperatively. Previous logistic models had poor performance, with areas under the curve of 0.544 and 0.586. In the model construction, the areas under the curve were 0.595, 0.842, and 0.714 for the logistic, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. However, only the XGBoost model exhibited good discrimination and calibration for both internal and external validations. Body mass index (BMI), C point of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification stage, age, Aa point of POP quantification stage, and TVM surgery were the 5 most important predictors of postoperative SUI in the XGBoost model. CONCLUSIONS: Previous models had poor discrimination and calibration among a Chinese population. Hence, we developed and validated an XGBoost model, which performed well irrespective of the preoperative subjective urinary incontinence (preUI) and surgical methods. Further validation is still required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10113075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101130752023-04-19 Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model Fu, Linru Huang, Guanghua Sun, Zhijing Zhu, Lan Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous prediction models for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cannot be applied to patients receiving transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and colpocleisis or those with preoperative subject urinary incontinence. This study aimed to develop and validate a new machine learning model and compare it to previous models. METHODS: Female patients who underwent prolapse surgeries for stage 2–4 anterior or apical prolapse between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Prolapse surgeries included native tissue repair, LeFort/colpocleisis, sacrocolpopexy, and TVM surgery. The existing models to predict postoperative SUI were externally validated. Subsequently, the dataset was randomly divided into 2 sets in a 4:1 ratio. The larger group was used to construct and internally validate models of logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which were then externally validated. The discrimination of the prediction models was evaluated using the area under the curve, while the calibration of the models was measured using the Spiegelhalter z test, mean absolute error (MSE), and calibration curves. RESULTS: Overall, 555 patients were enrolled, and 116 experienced SUI 1 year postoperatively. Previous logistic models had poor performance, with areas under the curve of 0.544 and 0.586. In the model construction, the areas under the curve were 0.595, 0.842, and 0.714 for the logistic, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. However, only the XGBoost model exhibited good discrimination and calibration for both internal and external validations. Body mass index (BMI), C point of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification stage, age, Aa point of POP quantification stage, and TVM surgery were the 5 most important predictors of postoperative SUI in the XGBoost model. CONCLUSIONS: Previous models had poor discrimination and calibration among a Chinese population. Hence, we developed and validated an XGBoost model, which performed well irrespective of the preoperative subjective urinary incontinence (preUI) and surgical methods. Further validation is still required. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-01 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10113075/ /pubmed/37082678 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3648 Text en 2023 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Fu, Linru
Huang, Guanghua
Sun, Zhijing
Zhu, Lan
Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title_full Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title_fullStr Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title_short Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
title_sort predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082678
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3648
work_keys_str_mv AT fulinru predictingtheoccurrenceofstressurinaryincontinenceafterprolapsesurgeryamachinelearningbasedmodel
AT huangguanghua predictingtheoccurrenceofstressurinaryincontinenceafterprolapsesurgeryamachinelearningbasedmodel
AT sunzhijing predictingtheoccurrenceofstressurinaryincontinenceafterprolapsesurgeryamachinelearningbasedmodel
AT zhulan predictingtheoccurrenceofstressurinaryincontinenceafterprolapsesurgeryamachinelearningbasedmodel