Cargando…

A retrospective comparative cohort study of ultra-pulse CO(2) lattice laser and glucocorticoids in the treatment of vulvar epithelial nonneoplastic lesions

BACKGROUND: A comparison of topical glucocorticoids with CO(2) fractional laser treatment was conducted to investigate the differences in the efficacy of non-neoplastic vulvar epithelial lesion treatments in different pathological types and to provide a scientific basis for the management of these d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Dongmei, Li, Jijie, Zhang, Yueting, Meng, Jian, Chen, Yueyue, Niu, Xiaoyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082673
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-677
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: A comparison of topical glucocorticoids with CO(2) fractional laser treatment was conducted to investigate the differences in the efficacy of non-neoplastic vulvar epithelial lesion treatments in different pathological types and to provide a scientific basis for the management of these disorders. This paper was to study the difference of curative effect of different pathological types of non-tumor vulvar epithelial lesions and provide scientific basis for the treatment of these diseases. METHODS: From November 2016 to July 2018, 178 cases of vulvar lichen simplex chronicus (LSC) or lichen sclerosus were confirmed with vulvar biopsy at our institute. Finally, 160 patients were enrolled in this trial. The patients were divided into 2 groups: a group treated with topical hormone and a group treated with CO(2) lattice laser therapies. There were 80 cases in each group, including 40 with LSC and 40 with lichen sclerosus. Patients applied 1 gram of progesterone cream and betamethasone cream to the affected area in the morning and evening, respectively, once a day for 3 months. The efficacy was evaluated with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) subjective symptom improvement scale and clinical efficacy evaluation scale. The formula was applied to calculate the curative effect index. RESULTS: The PGI-C scores at 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment showed that the laser treatment group had remarkably superior outcomes to the glucocorticoid treatment group. The clinical efficacy score scale at 3- and 6-month treatments indicated a significantly greater curative effect in the laser than in the glucocorticoid treatment (P=0.006 and P=0.002 respectively). In the glucocorticoid group, the clinical effects of different pathological subtypes were significantly different following the 1- and 3-month treatments. The efficacy of treatment for LSC was better than that for lichen sclerosus. Following the 3- and 6-month treatments, the clinical effect for LSC was better than that of lichen sclerosus (3 months: 95% vs. 75%; 6 months: and 95% vs. 70%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrapulse CO(2) lattice laser was more effective than was glucocorticoid therapy in the treatment of vulvar epithelial non–tumor-like lesions.