Cargando…

Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one patients 65 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiee, Madeline S., Golz, Andrew G., Kim, Andrew, Cohen, Joseph B., Summers, Hobie D., Alexander, Anup J., Lack, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37082231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as “high-risk” if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees. RESULTS: Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [−18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as “low-risk” in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 − 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 − 3, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV diagnostic study.