Cargando…

Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program

PURPOSE: To assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT™) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenner, Alison T., Waters, Austin R., Wangen, Mary, Rohweder, Catherine, Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo, Marciniak, Macary Weck, Ferrari, Renée M., Wheeler, Stephanie B., Shah, Parth D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x
_version_ 1785145841990762496
author Brenner, Alison T.
Waters, Austin R.
Wangen, Mary
Rohweder, Catherine
Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo
Marciniak, Macary Weck
Ferrari, Renée M.
Wheeler, Stephanie B.
Shah, Parth D.
author_facet Brenner, Alison T.
Waters, Austin R.
Wangen, Mary
Rohweder, Catherine
Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo
Marciniak, Macary Weck
Ferrari, Renée M.
Wheeler, Stephanie B.
Shah, Parth D.
author_sort Brenner, Alison T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT™) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service quality rating). METHODS: We conducted a national online survey of non-institutionalized US adults through panels managed by Qualtrics, a survey research company. A total of 1,045 adults (response rate 62%) completed the survey between March and April 2021. Sampling quotas matched respondents to the 2010 US Census and oversampled rural residents. We assessed pharmacy use patterns by rurality and design preferences for learning about PharmFIT™; receiving a FIT kit from a pharmacy; and completing and returning the FIT kit. RESULTS: Pharmacy use patterns varied, with some notable differences across rurality. Rural respondents used local, independently owned pharmacies more than non-rural respondents (20.4%, 6.3%, p < 0.001) and rated pharmacy service quality higher than non-rural respondents. Non-rural respondents preferred digital communication to learn about PharmFIT™ (36% vs 47%; p < 0.001) as well as digital FIT counseling (41% vs 49%; p = 0.02) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns: respondents who pick up prescriptions in-person preferred to get their FIT (OR 7.7; 5.3–11.2) and return it in-person at the pharmacy (OR 1.7; 1.1–2.4). CONCLUSION: Pharmacies are highly accessible and could be useful for expanding access to CRC screening services. Local context and pharmacy use patterns should be considered in the design and implementation of PharmFIT™. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10113122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101131222023-12-02 Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program Brenner, Alison T. Waters, Austin R. Wangen, Mary Rohweder, Catherine Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo Marciniak, Macary Weck Ferrari, Renée M. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Shah, Parth D. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: To assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT™) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service quality rating). METHODS: We conducted a national online survey of non-institutionalized US adults through panels managed by Qualtrics, a survey research company. A total of 1,045 adults (response rate 62%) completed the survey between March and April 2021. Sampling quotas matched respondents to the 2010 US Census and oversampled rural residents. We assessed pharmacy use patterns by rurality and design preferences for learning about PharmFIT™; receiving a FIT kit from a pharmacy; and completing and returning the FIT kit. RESULTS: Pharmacy use patterns varied, with some notable differences across rurality. Rural respondents used local, independently owned pharmacies more than non-rural respondents (20.4%, 6.3%, p < 0.001) and rated pharmacy service quality higher than non-rural respondents. Non-rural respondents preferred digital communication to learn about PharmFIT™ (36% vs 47%; p < 0.001) as well as digital FIT counseling (41% vs 49%; p = 0.02) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns: respondents who pick up prescriptions in-person preferred to get their FIT (OR 7.7; 5.3–11.2) and return it in-person at the pharmacy (OR 1.7; 1.1–2.4). CONCLUSION: Pharmacies are highly accessible and could be useful for expanding access to CRC screening services. Local context and pharmacy use patterns should be considered in the design and implementation of PharmFIT™. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10113122/ /pubmed/37072526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Brenner, Alison T.
Waters, Austin R.
Wangen, Mary
Rohweder, Catherine
Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo
Marciniak, Macary Weck
Ferrari, Renée M.
Wheeler, Stephanie B.
Shah, Parth D.
Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_full Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_fullStr Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_short Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_sort patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brenneralisont patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT watersaustinr patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT wangenmary patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT rohwedercatherine patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT odebunmiolufeyisayo patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT marciniakmacaryweck patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT ferrarireneem patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT wheelerstephanieb patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT shahparthd patientpreferencesforthedesignofapharmacybasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram