Cargando…
Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery
Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33588-z |
_version_ | 1785027784671756288 |
---|---|
author | Yuh, Woon Tak Kim, Minjung Choi, Yunhee Han, Junghoon Kim, Junhoe Kim, Taeshin Chung, Chun Kee Lee, Chang-Hyun Park, Sung Bae Kim, Kyoung-Tae Rhee, John M. Park, Moon Soo Kim, Chi Heon |
author_facet | Yuh, Woon Tak Kim, Minjung Choi, Yunhee Han, Junghoon Kim, Junhoe Kim, Taeshin Chung, Chun Kee Lee, Chang-Hyun Park, Sung Bae Kim, Kyoung-Tae Rhee, John M. Park, Moon Soo Kim, Chi Heon |
author_sort | Yuh, Woon Tak |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise and regularly update overall surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the rate of additional surgery between anterior and posterior surgeries for degenerative cervical spinal disease using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) nationwide patient database. The NHIS-NSC is a population-based cohort with about a million participants. This retrospective cohort study included 741 adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent their first cervical spinal surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disease. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. An event was defined as the registration of any type of cervical spinal surgery during the follow-up period. Event-free survival analysis was used for outcome analysis, and the following factors were used as covariates for adjustment: location of disease, sex, age, type of insurance, disability, type of hospital, Charles comorbidity Index, and osteoporosis. Anterior cervical surgery was selected for 75.0% of the patients, and posterior cervical surgery for the remaining 25.0%. Cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, hard disc, or soft disc was the primary diagnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of them. Additional surgery was performed for 5.0% of the patients after anterior cervical surgery and 6.5% of the patients after posterior cervical surgery (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.40–1.74). The rates of additional surgery were not different between anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. The results would be helpful in evaluating current practice as a whole and adjusting the health insurance policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10113194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101131942023-04-20 Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery Yuh, Woon Tak Kim, Minjung Choi, Yunhee Han, Junghoon Kim, Junhoe Kim, Taeshin Chung, Chun Kee Lee, Chang-Hyun Park, Sung Bae Kim, Kyoung-Tae Rhee, John M. Park, Moon Soo Kim, Chi Heon Sci Rep Article Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise and regularly update overall surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the rate of additional surgery between anterior and posterior surgeries for degenerative cervical spinal disease using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) nationwide patient database. The NHIS-NSC is a population-based cohort with about a million participants. This retrospective cohort study included 741 adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent their first cervical spinal surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disease. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. An event was defined as the registration of any type of cervical spinal surgery during the follow-up period. Event-free survival analysis was used for outcome analysis, and the following factors were used as covariates for adjustment: location of disease, sex, age, type of insurance, disability, type of hospital, Charles comorbidity Index, and osteoporosis. Anterior cervical surgery was selected for 75.0% of the patients, and posterior cervical surgery for the remaining 25.0%. Cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, hard disc, or soft disc was the primary diagnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of them. Additional surgery was performed for 5.0% of the patients after anterior cervical surgery and 6.5% of the patients after posterior cervical surgery (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.40–1.74). The rates of additional surgery were not different between anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. The results would be helpful in evaluating current practice as a whole and adjusting the health insurance policy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10113194/ /pubmed/37072455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33588-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yuh, Woon Tak Kim, Minjung Choi, Yunhee Han, Junghoon Kim, Junhoe Kim, Taeshin Chung, Chun Kee Lee, Chang-Hyun Park, Sung Bae Kim, Kyoung-Tae Rhee, John M. Park, Moon Soo Kim, Chi Heon Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title | Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title_full | Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title_fullStr | Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title_short | Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
title_sort | nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33588-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhwoontak nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT kimminjung nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT choiyunhee nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT hanjunghoon nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT kimjunhoe nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT kimtaeshin nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT chungchunkee nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT leechanghyun nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT parksungbae nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT kimkyoungtae nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT rheejohnm nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT parkmoonsoo nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery AT kimchiheon nationwidesampledataanalysisofadditionalsurgeryrateafteranteriororposteriorcervicalspinalsurgery |