Cargando…
Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture
PURPOSE: After acute hospital admission, patients with a hip fracture are frequently discharged to skilled nursing homes providing geriatric rehabilitation (GR). There are few evidence-based studies regarding specific treatment times and assessments during GR. This study aims to provide a descriptio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00755-4 |
_version_ | 1785027819267424256 |
---|---|
author | Mattiazzo, G. F. Drewes, Y. M. van Eijk, M. Achterberg, W. P. |
author_facet | Mattiazzo, G. F. Drewes, Y. M. van Eijk, M. Achterberg, W. P. |
author_sort | Mattiazzo, G. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: After acute hospital admission, patients with a hip fracture are frequently discharged to skilled nursing homes providing geriatric rehabilitation (GR). There are few evidence-based studies regarding specific treatment times and assessments during GR. This study aims to provide a description of care for hip fracture patients during GR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Descriptive study analyzing the care pathways from GR facilities, regarding healthcare professionals involved, allocated treatment time per profession, total length of rehabilitation stay, and assessment instruments. Based on the reimbursement algorithm (diagnostic treatment combination = DBCs), of 25 patients, the registered actual treatment time per profession was calculated. RESULTS: The care pathways pivoted on three groups of health care professionals: medical team (MT), physiotherapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT). There was some discrepancy between the allocated time in the care pathways and the calculated mean actual treatment time from the DBCs. First week: MT 120–180 min, DBC 120 (SD: 59) minutes; PT 120–230 min, DBC 129 (SD: 58) minutes; and OT 65–165 min, DBC 93 (SD: 61) minutes. From week two onwards, MT 15–36 min, DBC 49 (SD: 29) minutes; PT 74–179 min, DBC 125 (SD: 50) minutes; and OT 25–60 min, DBC 47 (SD: 44) minutes. Dieticians, psychologists, and social workers were sporadically mentioned. There was heterogeneity in the assessment and screening tools. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to define current standard care in GR after hip fracture in the Netherlands due to the diversity in care pathways and large practice variation. This is a problem in conducting randomized effectiveness research with care provided as control. TRIAL REGISTER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: NL7491 04-02-2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10113343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101133432023-04-20 Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture Mattiazzo, G. F. Drewes, Y. M. van Eijk, M. Achterberg, W. P. Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: After acute hospital admission, patients with a hip fracture are frequently discharged to skilled nursing homes providing geriatric rehabilitation (GR). There are few evidence-based studies regarding specific treatment times and assessments during GR. This study aims to provide a description of care for hip fracture patients during GR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Descriptive study analyzing the care pathways from GR facilities, regarding healthcare professionals involved, allocated treatment time per profession, total length of rehabilitation stay, and assessment instruments. Based on the reimbursement algorithm (diagnostic treatment combination = DBCs), of 25 patients, the registered actual treatment time per profession was calculated. RESULTS: The care pathways pivoted on three groups of health care professionals: medical team (MT), physiotherapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT). There was some discrepancy between the allocated time in the care pathways and the calculated mean actual treatment time from the DBCs. First week: MT 120–180 min, DBC 120 (SD: 59) minutes; PT 120–230 min, DBC 129 (SD: 58) minutes; and OT 65–165 min, DBC 93 (SD: 61) minutes. From week two onwards, MT 15–36 min, DBC 49 (SD: 29) minutes; PT 74–179 min, DBC 125 (SD: 50) minutes; and OT 25–60 min, DBC 47 (SD: 44) minutes. Dieticians, psychologists, and social workers were sporadically mentioned. There was heterogeneity in the assessment and screening tools. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to define current standard care in GR after hip fracture in the Netherlands due to the diversity in care pathways and large practice variation. This is a problem in conducting randomized effectiveness research with care provided as control. TRIAL REGISTER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: NL7491 04-02-2019. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10113343/ /pubmed/36788193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00755-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Mattiazzo, G. F. Drewes, Y. M. van Eijk, M. Achterberg, W. P. Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title | Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title_full | Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title_fullStr | Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title_full_unstemmed | Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title_short | Geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
title_sort | geriatric rehabilitation care after hip fracture |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00755-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mattiazzogf geriatricrehabilitationcareafterhipfracture AT drewesym geriatricrehabilitationcareafterhipfracture AT vaneijkm geriatricrehabilitationcareafterhipfracture AT achterbergwp geriatricrehabilitationcareafterhipfracture |