Cargando…

Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leu, Justin, Akerman, Meredith, Mendez, Christopher, Lischalk, Jonathan W., Carpenter, Todd, Ebling, David, Haas, Jonathan A., Witten, Matthew, Barbaro, Marissa, Duic, Paul, Tessler, Lee, Repka, Michael C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777
_version_ 1785027892114096128
author Leu, Justin
Akerman, Meredith
Mendez, Christopher
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Carpenter, Todd
Ebling, David
Haas, Jonathan A.
Witten, Matthew
Barbaro, Marissa
Duic, Paul
Tessler, Lee
Repka, Michael C.
author_facet Leu, Justin
Akerman, Meredith
Mendez, Christopher
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Carpenter, Todd
Ebling, David
Haas, Jonathan A.
Witten, Matthew
Barbaro, Marissa
Duic, Paul
Tessler, Lee
Repka, Michael C.
author_sort Leu, Justin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear. METHODS: This single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure. RESULTS: A total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure. DISCUSSION: An optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10113671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101136712023-04-20 Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure Leu, Justin Akerman, Meredith Mendez, Christopher Lischalk, Jonathan W. Carpenter, Todd Ebling, David Haas, Jonathan A. Witten, Matthew Barbaro, Marissa Duic, Paul Tessler, Lee Repka, Michael C. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear. METHODS: This single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure. RESULTS: A total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure. DISCUSSION: An optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10113671/ /pubmed/37091181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777 Text en Copyright © 2023 Leu, Akerman, Mendez, Lischalk, Carpenter, Ebling, Haas, Witten, Barbaro, Duic, Tessler and Repka https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Leu, Justin
Akerman, Meredith
Mendez, Christopher
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Carpenter, Todd
Ebling, David
Haas, Jonathan A.
Witten, Matthew
Barbaro, Marissa
Duic, Paul
Tessler, Lee
Repka, Michael C.
Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title_full Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title_fullStr Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title_full_unstemmed Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title_short Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
title_sort time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777
work_keys_str_mv AT leujustin timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT akermanmeredith timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT mendezchristopher timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT lischalkjonathanw timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT carpentertodd timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT eblingdavid timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT haasjonathana timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT wittenmatthew timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT barbaromarissa timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT duicpaul timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT tesslerlee timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure
AT repkamichaelc timeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentofbrainmetastaseswithstereotacticradiosurgeryisnotassociatedwithradionecrosisorlocalfailure