Cargando…

Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom

PURPOSE: To study the dosimetry impact of deformable image registration (DIR) using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RPLD) and custom developed phantom with various inserts. METHODS: The phantom was developed to facilitate simultaneous evaluation of geometric and dosimetric accuracy of DIR. Fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn, Kadoya, Noriyuki, Tanaka, Shohei, Sato, Kiyokazu, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Jingu, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13890
_version_ 1785027895887921152
author Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Tanaka, Shohei
Sato, Kiyokazu
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Jingu, Keiichi
author_facet Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Tanaka, Shohei
Sato, Kiyokazu
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Jingu, Keiichi
author_sort Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the dosimetry impact of deformable image registration (DIR) using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RPLD) and custom developed phantom with various inserts. METHODS: The phantom was developed to facilitate simultaneous evaluation of geometric and dosimetric accuracy of DIR. Four computed tomography (CT) images of the phantom were acquired with four different configurations. Four volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were computed for different phantom. Two different patterns were applied to combination of four phantom configurations. RPLD dose measurement was combined between corresponding two phantom configurations. DIR‐based dose accumulation was calculated between corresponding two CT images with two commercial DIR software and various DIR parameter settings, and an open source software. Accumulated dose calculated using DIR was then compared with measured dose using RPLD. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of dose difference was 2.71 ± 0.23% (range, 2.22%–3.01%) for tumor‐proxy and 3.74 ± 0.79% (range, 1.56%–4.83%) for rectum‐proxy. The mean ± SD of target registration error (TRE) was 1.66 ± 1.36 mm (range, 0.03–4.43 mm) for tumor‐proxy and 6.87 ± 5.49 mm (range, 0.54–17.47 mm) for rectum‐proxy. These results suggested that DIR accuracy had wide range among DIR parameter setting. CONCLUSIONS: The dose difference observed in our study was 3% for tumor‐proxy and within 5% for rectum‐proxy. The custom developed physical phantom with inserts showed potential for accurate evaluation of DIR‐based dose accumulation. The prospect of simultaneous evaluation of geometric and dosimetric DIR accuracy in a single phantom may be useful for validation of DIR for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10113686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101136862023-04-20 Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn Kadoya, Noriyuki Tanaka, Shohei Sato, Kiyokazu Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Jingu, Keiichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To study the dosimetry impact of deformable image registration (DIR) using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RPLD) and custom developed phantom with various inserts. METHODS: The phantom was developed to facilitate simultaneous evaluation of geometric and dosimetric accuracy of DIR. Four computed tomography (CT) images of the phantom were acquired with four different configurations. Four volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were computed for different phantom. Two different patterns were applied to combination of four phantom configurations. RPLD dose measurement was combined between corresponding two phantom configurations. DIR‐based dose accumulation was calculated between corresponding two CT images with two commercial DIR software and various DIR parameter settings, and an open source software. Accumulated dose calculated using DIR was then compared with measured dose using RPLD. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of dose difference was 2.71 ± 0.23% (range, 2.22%–3.01%) for tumor‐proxy and 3.74 ± 0.79% (range, 1.56%–4.83%) for rectum‐proxy. The mean ± SD of target registration error (TRE) was 1.66 ± 1.36 mm (range, 0.03–4.43 mm) for tumor‐proxy and 6.87 ± 5.49 mm (range, 0.54–17.47 mm) for rectum‐proxy. These results suggested that DIR accuracy had wide range among DIR parameter setting. CONCLUSIONS: The dose difference observed in our study was 3% for tumor‐proxy and within 5% for rectum‐proxy. The custom developed physical phantom with inserts showed potential for accurate evaluation of DIR‐based dose accumulation. The prospect of simultaneous evaluation of geometric and dosimetric DIR accuracy in a single phantom may be useful for validation of DIR for clinical use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10113686/ /pubmed/36609786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13890 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Sakulsingharoj, Siwaporn
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Tanaka, Shohei
Sato, Kiyokazu
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Jingu, Keiichi
Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title_full Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title_fullStr Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title_short Dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
title_sort dosimetric impact of deformable image registration using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters with a physical geometric phantom
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13890
work_keys_str_mv AT sakulsingharojsiwaporn dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom
AT kadoyanoriyuki dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom
AT tanakashohei dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom
AT satokiyokazu dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom
AT nakamuramitsuhiro dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom
AT jingukeiichi dosimetricimpactofdeformableimageregistrationusingradiophotoluminescentglassdosimeterswithaphysicalgeometricphantom