Cargando…

Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of the surrounding environment of the target tissue, lesion size, and rectangular sampling box size on shear wave speed (SWS). METHODS: The tendon SWS was acquired ex‐vivo. Then the tendons were dissected and buried in the couplant (gel) and evaluated by two‐dime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiuming, Zhu, Jiaan, Liu, Yiqun, Li, Wenxue, Chen, Si, Zhang, Huabin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13924
_version_ 1785027900366389248
author Wang, Xiuming
Zhu, Jiaan
Liu, Yiqun
Li, Wenxue
Chen, Si
Zhang, Huabin
author_facet Wang, Xiuming
Zhu, Jiaan
Liu, Yiqun
Li, Wenxue
Chen, Si
Zhang, Huabin
author_sort Wang, Xiuming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of the surrounding environment of the target tissue, lesion size, and rectangular sampling box size on shear wave speed (SWS). METHODS: The tendon SWS was acquired ex‐vivo. Then the tendons were dissected and buried in the couplant (gel) and evaluated by two‐dimensional shear wave elastography (2D‐SWE). Finally, the tendons were placed in the isolated muscles to simulate the intramuscular lesions, and their elasticity was tested under two rectangular sampling box conditions. The isolated complete liver SWS was acquired. Similarly, the large and small pieces of livers were cut out, placed in the muscles, and assessed by SWE under two rectangular sampling box conditions. The SWS acquired under different conditions was compared. Variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate repeatability. RESULTS: The SWS of the tendons ex‐vivo, buried in the couplant and placed in the isolated muscles showed significant differences (p < 0.001). The ex‐vivo condition produced the highest SWS and CV values. There were significant differences in SWS of livers with different sizes placed in muscles (p < 0.001). The highest SWS value was associated with small pieces of livers. No significant difference was found in SWS acquired under different rectangular box sizes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the present study conditions, the surrounding environment of the target tissue makes a big difference to lesion SWS values. The lesion size will affect the assessment of its inherent elasticity. The size of the sampling frame has no significant effect on the tissue SWS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10113705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101137052023-04-20 Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study Wang, Xiuming Zhu, Jiaan Liu, Yiqun Li, Wenxue Chen, Si Zhang, Huabin J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of the surrounding environment of the target tissue, lesion size, and rectangular sampling box size on shear wave speed (SWS). METHODS: The tendon SWS was acquired ex‐vivo. Then the tendons were dissected and buried in the couplant (gel) and evaluated by two‐dimensional shear wave elastography (2D‐SWE). Finally, the tendons were placed in the isolated muscles to simulate the intramuscular lesions, and their elasticity was tested under two rectangular sampling box conditions. The isolated complete liver SWS was acquired. Similarly, the large and small pieces of livers were cut out, placed in the muscles, and assessed by SWE under two rectangular sampling box conditions. The SWS acquired under different conditions was compared. Variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate repeatability. RESULTS: The SWS of the tendons ex‐vivo, buried in the couplant and placed in the isolated muscles showed significant differences (p < 0.001). The ex‐vivo condition produced the highest SWS and CV values. There were significant differences in SWS of livers with different sizes placed in muscles (p < 0.001). The highest SWS value was associated with small pieces of livers. No significant difference was found in SWS acquired under different rectangular box sizes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the present study conditions, the surrounding environment of the target tissue makes a big difference to lesion SWS values. The lesion size will affect the assessment of its inherent elasticity. The size of the sampling frame has no significant effect on the tissue SWS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10113705/ /pubmed/36729737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13924 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Wang, Xiuming
Zhu, Jiaan
Liu, Yiqun
Li, Wenxue
Chen, Si
Zhang, Huabin
Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title_full Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title_fullStr Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title_short Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: An animal ex‐vivo study
title_sort assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography: an animal ex‐vivo study
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13924
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiuming assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy
AT zhujiaan assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy
AT liuyiqun assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy
AT liwenxue assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy
AT chensi assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy
AT zhanghuabin assessmentofultrasoundshearwaveelastographyananimalexvivostudy