Cargando…
Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study
Deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abd...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13888 |
_version_ | 1785027900604416000 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu Kunieda, Etsuo Futakami, Natsumi Akiba, Takeshi Nagao, Ryuta Fukuzawa, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Tomomi Kuroki, Toshihisa Mikami, Tatsuya Nakano, Yoji Okumura, Yasuhiro Souda, Kenji Mutu, Eride Sugawara, Akitomo |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu Kunieda, Etsuo Futakami, Natsumi Akiba, Takeshi Nagao, Ryuta Fukuzawa, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Tomomi Kuroki, Toshihisa Mikami, Tatsuya Nakano, Yoji Okumura, Yasuhiro Souda, Kenji Mutu, Eride Sugawara, Akitomo |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A‐DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T‐DIBH). Free‐breathing, A‐DIBH, and T‐DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A‐DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T‐DIBH than in A‐DIBH. Moreover, A‐DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH. In conclusion, A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A‐DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10113706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101137062023-04-20 Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu Kunieda, Etsuo Futakami, Natsumi Akiba, Takeshi Nagao, Ryuta Fukuzawa, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Tomomi Kuroki, Toshihisa Mikami, Tatsuya Nakano, Yoji Okumura, Yasuhiro Souda, Kenji Mutu, Eride Sugawara, Akitomo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A‐DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T‐DIBH). Free‐breathing, A‐DIBH, and T‐DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A‐DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T‐DIBH than in A‐DIBH. Moreover, A‐DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH. In conclusion, A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A‐DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10113706/ /pubmed/36617188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13888 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu Kunieda, Etsuo Futakami, Natsumi Akiba, Takeshi Nagao, Ryuta Fukuzawa, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Tomomi Kuroki, Toshihisa Mikami, Tatsuya Nakano, Yoji Okumura, Yasuhiro Souda, Kenji Mutu, Eride Sugawara, Akitomo Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title | Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title_full | Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title_fullStr | Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title_short | Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study |
title_sort | dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: a comparative dosimetric study |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotoyoshitsugu doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT kuniedaetsuo doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT futakaminatsumi doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT akibatakeshi doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT nagaoryuta doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT fukuzawatsuyoshi doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT katsumatatomomi doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT kurokitoshihisa doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT mikamitatsuya doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT nakanoyoji doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT okumurayasuhiro doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT soudakenji doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT mutueride doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy AT sugawaraakitomo doseandorgandisplacementcomparisonswithbreastconservativeradiotherapyusingabdominalandthoracicdeepinspirationbreathholdsacomparativedosimetricstudy |